Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Roar ruling on 8.5v

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-2011 | 11:03 AM
  #1  
pakk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Elite
iTrader: (80)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,082
Default Roar ruling on 8.5v

How do you feel about the guy next to you charging is lipo to 4.25 per cell?
pakk is offline  
Old 07-17-2011 | 11:18 AM
  #2  
whitrzac's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (97)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,812
From: WI
Default

Originally Posted by pakk
How do you feel about the guy next to you charging is lipo to 4.25 per cell?
I sometimes charge to 4.3v a cell... NO issues...


I know what I'm doing, IDK if the person next to me does though...


'overcharging' your batt is not dangerous if you know what your doing and have 'good' batteries(new, not puffed, low IR, etc). Its not until you get joe schmo that wants to get every last race out of his $150 battery that is 4 years old, puffed, and about to blow on its own, that you start to have issues...


Pay attention to your batts and you won't have any issues...
whitrzac is offline  
Old 07-17-2011 | 11:49 AM
  #3  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 263
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

I charge to 4.2v per cell... but thats what ive always been told and thats what my "smart" charger is setup to do. i always balance charge as well.

sorry to sound like a noob, but what is the deal with this? why are they rated at 3.7v but charge up to ~4.2v per cell? EVERYONE i know or have seen at the track does this as well.
turbo4age is offline  
Old 07-17-2011 | 12:01 PM
  #4  
ohh EPiC FAiL's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 983
From: KCMO
Default

Originally Posted by turbo4age
I charge to 4.2v per cell... but thats what ive always been told and thats what my "smart" charger is setup to do. i always balance charge as well.

sorry to sound like a noob, but what is the deal with this? why are they rated at 3.7v but charge up to ~4.2v per cell? EVERYONE i know or have seen at the track does this as well.
3.7v is the nominal voltage per cell, which means it charges to 4.2v per cell but will drop to 3.7 rather quickly then they discharge much slower. that's the best i can explain it.

i really don't see the point of overcharging your batts by such a small amount when they'll drop to nominal fairly quickly anyway. seems like it's just a good way to blow your batteries with no real benefits.
ohh EPiC FAiL is offline  
Old 07-17-2011 | 12:17 PM
  #5  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 11,530
From: Houston, TX
Default

They're not really 'rated' at 3.7cv/cell, just referred to like that. This is called the 'nominal' voltage. Not much diff than a sub c or AA NiMh cell where they're referred to as 1.2v/cell when they charge to higher than that.



Supposedly, the 3.7v/cell is what a lipo cell drops to under load.....
Duster_360 is offline  
Old 07-17-2011 | 04:39 PM
  #6  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,465
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default

All he is doing by over-charging his cells is lowering the lifespan of his battery

Any decent load on the pack will take it down anyway

Cheers
crusey_aus is offline  
Old 07-17-2011 | 05:43 PM
  #7  
pakk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Elite
iTrader: (80)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,082
Default

This thread comes from Roar changing the max allowable voltage at roar events to 8.5v.

At events, racers are going to push every rule to their limits. So if the max allowable voltage is 8.5v, they are going to charge their packs to 8.5v.

How safe is this? How much damage are you doing to your cells?
pakk is offline  
Old 07-17-2011 | 06:08 PM
  #8  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,465
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default

8.4v vs 8.5v, hardly a noticeable difference

Early non balance lipo chargers used to charge to 4.3v / cell

Once they started to realize it reduced pack lifespan people started to lower it

You seriously think there would be any performance increase at all ?

Have you seen a high current discharge graph ?

Look at how long the voltage stays above 4v





Cheers

Last edited by crusey_aus; 07-17-2011 at 06:18 PM.
crusey_aus is offline  
Old 08-01-2011 | 03:45 PM
  #9  
FMW's Avatar
FMW
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 844
From: Laguna Niguel
Default

What ROAR is doing is plain silly and dangerous. Here's why:

1. Most chargers are set to cut off between 8.4 to 8.44 volts. I've seen some mis-calibrated chargers take them to 8.46.
2. By allowing the 8.5 limit at racing events, they are essentially saying it's OK to take your pack to 8.5, which can only be done if you by-pass the charge limit. In my personal case I have a Much More silent charger. It cuts off at 8.40-8.41. The only way I could get it to reach 8.5 is to re-peak the pack in HiMh mode. If you do this you will have to sit and monitor your charger until it hits that voltage. What if someone forgets to do that??? Your battery will continue to charge.

Just my opionion as a race organizer and director.
FMW is offline  
Old 08-01-2011 | 07:30 PM
  #10  
whitrzac's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (97)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,812
From: WI
Default

I can set my Icharger anywhere between 4.1-4.3v a cell... just because your charger can't doesn't mean that others cant...

EDIT: I've found that the difference between 4.1v and 4.3v a cell is about 500mah on a 5000mah battery...
whitrzac is offline  
Old 08-01-2011 | 07:33 PM
  #11  
ZiG-87's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 897
Default

If the guy next to me feels that he needs an extra 0.1 volts in his battery to win then I say fill your shorts buddy.
ZiG-87 is offline  
Old 08-01-2011 | 11:52 PM
  #12  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,465
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by whitrzac
I can set my Icharger anywhere between 4.1-4.3v a cell... just because your charger can't doesn't mean that others cant...

EDIT: I've found that the difference between 4.1v and 4.3v a cell is about 500mah on a 5000mah battery...

Any how many cycles will you lose by doing that ?

Cheers
crusey_aus is offline  
Old 08-02-2011 | 03:57 AM
  #13  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 309
Default

universal rule in rc and computing: no matter what you do, some weenie will seriously shorten the life of his kit to become a tiny fraction of 1 percent faster than you.
skree is offline  
Old 08-02-2011 | 08:36 AM
  #14  
racer1812's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,743
From: RIP 'Chopper', 4/18/13 miss you bud:(
Default

Originally Posted by FMW
What ROAR is doing is plain silly and dangerous. Here's why:

1. Most chargers are set to cut off between 8.4 to 8.44 volts. I've seen some mis-calibrated chargers take them to 8.46.
2. By allowing the 8.5 limit at racing events, they are essentially saying it's OK to take your pack to 8.5, which can only be done if you by-pass the charge limit. In my personal case I have a Much More silent charger. It cuts off at 8.40-8.41. The only way I could get it to reach 8.5 is to re-peak the pack in HiMh mode. If you do this you will have to sit and monitor your charger until it hits that voltage. What if someone forgets to do that??? Your battery will continue to charge.

Just my opionion as a race organizer and director.
My question; is the above the reason ROAR is making the rule change? 8.5v doesn't bother me really. That 1/10th of a volt isn't going to gain you anything anyway, it's gone in the first 1/2 lap of warm up.

BTW my charger will let me charge to 8.6v......IF I want too
racer1812 is offline  
Old 08-02-2011 | 11:55 AM
  #15  
HarryLeach's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,859
From: Hampton, VA, USA
Default

Apparently I missed this. Where did ROAR declare the upper limit to now be 8.5V?

I've had cheaper chargers that I found to be quite safe with my batteries, but showed a peaked battery above 8.4V during tech. This could be an effort to ease the burden of cost in upgrading to an adjustable peak LiPo charger [which I have upgraded to for the ability to adjust my peak to meet tech with less hassle].
HarryLeach is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.