Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Radio and Electronics
The age old connector question >

The age old connector question

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree10Likes

The age old connector question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2023 | 11:27 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 68
Default The age old connector question

So I’m getting back into RC with my kids and accumulating cars and batteries with various connectors. Want to consolidate. What does everyone recommend nowadays?

The biggest car so far is a Losi SCTE 3.0 running a Castle mamba x and 3200kv motor. Biggest batteries are LiHV 2s 8000mah 100c.

Been running 5mm bullets on the truck, but want something easier for the kids.

Would obviously rather have a connector with some headroom than one that is running at the top of the spec. Something that could handle bigger batteries and cars in the future.

XT60? XT90? Castle 6.5?

thanks!
Jrxpro is offline  
Old 02-06-2023 | 12:51 PM
  #2  
LowClassCC's Avatar
Tech Adept
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 249
From: Southern Indiana
Default

XT60
Jrxpro likes this.
LowClassCC is offline  
Old 02-06-2023 | 12:53 PM
  #3  
Tech Master
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,874
From: Idaho
Default

Xt60.
Jrxpro likes this.
Silverbullet555 is offline  
Old 02-06-2023 | 12:55 PM
  #4  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (292)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,368
From: Central Wisconsin USA
Default

XT60 sounds good. Long as the connectors can't be plugged in backwards is the thing to watch. (especially with young'uns)
Jrxpro likes this.
Andy Koback is offline  
Old 02-06-2023 | 02:05 PM
  #5  
fyrstormer's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 8,054
From: Virginia, Near DC, USA
Default

I prefer XT90s instead of XT60s. They have more overhead for high amperage operation, they're easier to grip, and they're less likely to melt if you keep the soldering iron on the terminal a bit too long.

That said, I only use XT90s for my two RCs that run on 4S, and everything else runs on my 2S batteries with inboard 5mm bullet sockets for the least clutter and best fitment clearance. I would run inboard bullets on my 4S RCs too, if my preferred 4S battery actually came with inboard bullets.
Jrxpro likes this.
fyrstormer is offline  
Old 02-06-2023 | 02:21 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 68
Default

Originally Posted by fyrstormer
I prefer XT90s instead of XT60s. They have more overhead for high amperage operation, they're easier to grip, and they're less likely to melt if you keep the soldering iron on the terminal a bit too long.

That said, I only use XT90s for my two RCs that run on 4S, and everything else runs on my 2S batteries with inboard 5mm bullet sockets for the least clutter and best fitment clearance. I would run inboard bullets on my 4S RCs too, if my preferred 4S battery actually came with inboard bullets.
I was kinda thinking the same thing, if XT60 is good, is there any reason not to just use XT90? In case I decide to bump up to 3s or 4s?
Jrxpro is offline  
Old 02-06-2023 | 02:40 PM
  #7  
DirkW's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,904
From: Germany
Default

You don't need a bigger connector just for going up to 3s or 4s. XT60 should be good enough, but sure you can go bigger and use XT90, nothing wrong with it and even supports more amperage, if ever needed. But for voltage? Not necessary.
Jrxpro likes this.
DirkW is online now  
Old 02-06-2023 | 08:54 PM
  #8  
fyrstormer's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 8,054
From: Virginia, Near DC, USA
Default

If voltage were the only consideration then I would agree a larger connector is unnecessary; after all, it's amperage that generates heat in circuits, not voltage. But unless you're running a severely undergeared setup (such as a rock crawler), higher voltage is going to generate higher amperage too, because voltage is what pushes electric charge (measured in Coulombs) through the circuit against the resistance of the load. More voltage / similar resistance = higher amperage (Coulombs per second). XT60s may not get hot in most applications, but why not use a larger and easier to handle connector that also has a higher amperage rating, unless there's no room for it?

Whichever connector you get, choose one that has a no-spark design so you don't get that POP! when you plug the battery in. Over time that will pit the surfaces of the plugs, and there's no reason to put up with it if it can be avoided.
Jrxpro likes this.
fyrstormer is offline  
Old 02-06-2023 | 08:54 PM
  #9  
Geezatec's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,742
Default

XT60 B/N XT90. XT60 may get warm, XT90 Wont. Telling you You wont see any difference B/N the 2. only heat. with any MAH of battery.
Jrxpro likes this.
Geezatec is offline  
Old 02-06-2023 | 11:22 PM
  #10  
gigaplex's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,766
From: Melbourne, VIC
Default

Originally Posted by fyrstormer
If voltage were the only consideration then I would agree a larger connector is unnecessary; after all, it's amperage that generates heat in circuits, not voltage. But unless you're running a severely undergeared setup (such as a rock crawler), higher voltage is going to generate higher amperage too, because voltage is what pushes electric charge (measured in Coulombs) through the circuit against the resistance of the load. More voltage / similar resistance = higher amperage (Coulombs per second). XT60s may not get hot in most applications, but why not use a larger and easier to handle connector that also has a higher amperage rating, unless there's no room for it?

Whichever connector you get, choose one that has a no-spark design so you don't get that POP! when you plug the battery in. Over time that will pit the surfaces of the plugs, and there's no reason to put up with it if it can be avoided.
If you're not changing motor, yes a higher voltage will yield a higher current. But usually when speccing for a higher voltage, a higher turn motor is used, so the current levels are often similar or lower.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 02-07-2023 | 07:43 AM
  #11  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,410
From: Austin,TX
Default

I use 5mm bullets on my charger for a myriad of batteries that have either 5mm bullets or EC5 which also fit the same 5mm bullets... EC5 are fairly common for batteries which is why I use them, but I believe XT90 also uses 5mm bullets too that would be equivalent.
billdelong is offline  
Old 02-08-2023 | 02:09 PM
  #12  
fyrstormer's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 8,054
From: Virginia, Near DC, USA
Default

Originally Posted by gigaplex
If you're not changing motor, yes a higher voltage will yield a higher current. But usually when speccing for a higher voltage, a higher turn motor is used, so the current levels are often similar or lower.
I wouldn't take it for granted that someone going to a higher voltage battery is also installing a higher-resistance motor to match. A lot of RCers volt-up purely to go faster.
fyrstormer is offline  
Old 02-08-2023 | 02:11 PM
  #13  
fyrstormer's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 8,054
From: Virginia, Near DC, USA
Default

Originally Posted by billdelong
I use 5mm bullets on my charger for a myriad of batteries that have either 5mm bullets or EC5 which also fit the same 5mm bullets... EC5 are fairly common for batteries which is why I use them, but I believe XT90 also uses 5mm bullets too that would be equivalent.
Yep, XT90s use 5mm bullets. It's a good size for a wide range of RC applications.
fyrstormer is offline  
Old 02-08-2023 | 07:38 PM
  #14  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,627
Default

XT60's here.
Sabin is offline  
Old 02-08-2023 | 09:48 PM
  #15  
Sir 51D3WAYS's Avatar
Tech Champion
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 7,181
From: Stuck in urban hell
Default

XT90 if running 3s upwards or if you have the space. Anything smaller or space issues = deans.
Jrxpro likes this.
Sir 51D3WAYS is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.