Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Racing Forum
Regarding losing Race Tracks >

Regarding losing Race Tracks

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree50Likes

Regarding losing Race Tracks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2024, 12:05 PM
  #1  
Tech Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
AHR43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Houston, Texas USA
Posts: 954
Default Regarding losing Race Tracks

Interesting read that has crossover to what we've all experienced in RC. So we be not the only ones. Seen this come up as a topic on here before. Not sure whether to post it here or in Chat. So, Mod, move it if you have too.

Losing Race Tracks
OffRoadJunkie likes this.
AHR43 is offline  
Old 03-18-2024, 12:57 PM
  #2  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 10,194
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Yep. This has been going on for a long time. Race tracks never really made a lot of money, so the moment the property is worth something, the track is gone. Worse yet are the tracks that have been abandoned. North Wilksborough is probably the most famous, slowly fading into the weeds right next to an Interstate. Only the valiant efforts led by Dale Earnhardt Jr. saved that track. Meanwhile, did you watch the Bristol race? Did you see all the empty seats?
jiml is offline  
Old 03-18-2024, 01:07 PM
  #3  
Tech Master
iTrader: (9)
 
RC10Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,939
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Article title: When We Lose a Race Track, Everyone Loses

Article Contents: Man cries about his personal hobby not being more popular

There's really nothing substantive about this article, and it's written with a heavy bias.
gigaplex likes this.
RC10Nick is offline  
Old 03-19-2024, 08:02 AM
  #4  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (33)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Austin,TX
Posts: 6,194
Trader Rating: 33 (97%+)
Default

Kinda reminds me of a track I once raced in Florida which hosts go-kart racing simultaneously alongside RC Racing, which helped kill the time between races, it's a great concept!

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100057424390433

I think successful programs need to branch out and offer a wider range of interest to help draw in new blood.
Blakesrc and jiml like this.
billdelong is offline  
Old 03-20-2024, 05:57 AM
  #5  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 10,194
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by billdelong
I think successful programs need to branch out and offer a wider range of interest to help draw in new blood.
Excellent idea, but it's the execution that's the problem. What other interests do you offer?

The carpet off road track near me had a crawling track in the back. Very intricate. But I never saw anyone use it. They replaced with a drift track. Now they have a very healthy drift program going. And the mini-z track is very popular.

What works? What doesn't work? And when do you realize it was a bad idea?
staiguy likes this.
jiml is offline  
Old 03-20-2024, 07:18 AM
  #6  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (33)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Austin,TX
Posts: 6,194
Trader Rating: 33 (97%+)
Default

Originally Posted by jiml
Excellent idea, but it's the execution that's the problem. What other interests do you offer?


The carpet off road track near me had a crawling track in the back. Very intricate. But I never saw anyone use it. They replaced with a drift track. Now they have a very healthy drift program going. And the mini-z track is very popular.


What works? What doesn't work? And when do you realize it was a bad idea?

I think you hit the nail on the head... the local track in my area once had a YUGE following for 1/10 offroad where the club racing turnout often was larger than the 1/8 program. Then they moved all the 1/10 dirt onto the 1/8 track to offer larger 1/8 features and converted the 1/10 track into a turf track which was not well received. Many of the 1/10 drivers migrated over to 1/8 and eventually they converted the 1/10 turf track into a pit area due to lack of interest in the 1/10 program. Many folks asked to convert the 1/10 track back to dirt but that never happened.


They experimented with offering smaller 1/10 layouts inside the 1/8 track but it became a mix match of guys wanting to run their 1/10 cars on the full 1/8 layout.


It's a double edged sword... you need a 1/10 program which offers spec classes and low entry cost into the hobby, but it's hard to sustain those classes if the masses are expert level drivers.


They offered oval for a while and that was fairly popular until they suspended oval for a month to cater to a large 1/8 event, then all the oval racers migrated to other oval tracks and never came back.


RC is VERY fickle, especially when egos get in the way
nitrous36 and AHR43 like this.
billdelong is offline  
Old 03-20-2024, 10:56 AM
  #7  
Regional Moderator
 
nitrous36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 2,286
Default

Good read. Race tracks, fullsized or RC, loosing ground to greedy realtors, developers, HOAs, and NIMBYS? One word, boomers.
nitrous36 is offline  
Old 03-20-2024, 11:26 AM
  #8  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (33)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Austin,TX
Posts: 6,194
Trader Rating: 33 (97%+)
Default

The story about the closing of OCRC is a cautionary tale... I might not have all the specifics exactly right but this is the story I heard:

The track was located in the back of a strip mall which also shared rental space with an adjoining church. Apparently there was a feud between the church and the track for some time over limited parking and the 3 day events from the track would spill over to Sundays which pissed off the church. Supposedly the church wanted to "expand" and got the landlord to non-renew the lease for the track so the church could assume the lease. After the track closed and removed all the contents from the facility, the church claims they miscalculated their budget and can't lease the extra space after all... oops... sorry, not sorry. The church eliminated their parking problem

***
Lesson learned is for the track to own the property right?

So there was another track in Dallas called Mike's Hobby Shop where the land was owned by the track and the plan was for the track to remain in place indefinitely... until eminent domain allowed the city to widen the highway which wiped out something like 90% of the parking making it impossible to host racing at the venue and they were forced to sell.



AHR43 and El_Rando like this.
billdelong is offline  
Old 03-20-2024, 11:55 AM
  #9  
Regional Moderator
 
nitrous36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 2,286
Default

Originally Posted by billdelong
The story about the closing of OCRC is a cautionary tale... I might not have all the specifics exactly right but this is the story I heard:

The track was located in the back of a strip mall which also shared rental space with an adjoining church. Apparently there was a feud between the church and the track for some time over limited parking and the 3 day events from the track would spill over to Sundays which pissed off the church. Supposedly the church wanted to "expand" and got the landlord to non-renew the lease for the track so the church could assume the lease. After the track closed and removed all the contents from the facility, the church claims they miscalculated their budget and can't lease the extra space after all... oops... sorry, not sorry. The church eliminated their parking problem

***
Lesson learned is for the track to own the property right?

So there was another track in Dallas called Mike's Hobby Shop where the land was owned by the track and the plan was for the track to remain in place indefinitely... until eminent domain allowed the city to widen the highway which wiped out something like 90% of the parking making it impossible to host racing at the venue and they were forced to sell.
Thats usually how it goes.
nitrous36 is offline  
Old 03-20-2024, 12:01 PM
  #10  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (9)
 
Billy Kelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Far south suburbs of Chicago area
Posts: 17,636
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by billdelong
The story about the closing of OCRC is a cautionary tale... I might not have all the specifics exactly right but this is the story I heard:

The track was located in the back of a strip mall which also shared rental space with an adjoining church. Apparently there was a feud between the church and the track for some time over limited parking and the 3 day events from the track would spill over to Sundays which pissed off the church. Supposedly the church wanted to "expand" and got the landlord to non-renew the lease for the track so the church could assume the lease. After the track closed and removed all the contents from the facility, the church claims they miscalculated their budget and can't lease the extra space after all... oops... sorry, not sorry. The church eliminated their parking problem

***
Lesson learned is for the track to own the property right?

So there was another track in Dallas called Mike's Hobby Shop where the land was owned by the track and the plan was for the track to remain in place indefinitely... until eminent domain allowed the city to widen the highway which wiped out something like 90% of the parking making it impossible to host racing at the venue and they were forced to sell.
That’s the story I remember reading here in the thread for that track. I’ve got one track over near South Bend, Indiana. Had a great arrangement with a mall. Built and really cool track in the back storage space art of the mall. Not in a store front. Great deal on rent, then mall sold. New owners wanted the track out immediately. But after weeks of negotiations they allow them to stay till end of this April. Then have to be out as fast as possible so the mall can be remodeled.

I know of another near St. Louis that has to relocate immediately after mid June. Another in Wisconsin that been waiting for the building to be sold for the last year. Locally, the owner of ThunderDome did buy the building. We probably wouldn’t be still open if he hadn’t. He bought it more to have a place to go. To not just sit home after selling his business. But I don’t think most track owners are in the position to spend $700,000+ on a building
nitrous36 likes this.
Billy Kelly is offline  
Old 03-22-2024, 01:08 AM
  #11  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,596
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Most of the tracks I've seen close is because people simply do not show up and use it.

Build it and they will not come
jiml likes this.
rccartips is offline  
Old 03-22-2024, 04:58 AM
  #12  
Tech Master
iTrader: (9)
 
RC10Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,939
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

The problem is the economics of operating a track as a business is a terrible prospect. You don't make that much money doing it and you can really only make money on one day of the week if you're lucky. And on top of that you probably only make money during half the year. But leases and mortgages are still due year round. And with the same effort and resources, you could make a heck of a lot more money running just about any other kind of business. RC just isn't very profitable and when different businesses are competing for the same limited real estate space RC just can't compete. It's regular old free market forces doing what they always do.
fat500 and AHR43 like this.
RC10Nick is offline  
Old 03-22-2024, 05:13 AM
  #13  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
gigaplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 6,255
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by RC10Nick
The problem is the economics of operating a track as a business is a terrible prospect. You don't make that much money doing it and you can really only make money on one day of the week if you're lucky. And on top of that you probably only make money during half the year. But leases and mortgages are still due year round. And with the same effort and resources, you could make a heck of a lot more money running just about any other kind of business. RC just isn't very profitable and when different businesses are competing for the same limited real estate space RC just can't compete. It's regular old free market forces doing what they always do.
That's why every club where I live is a non-profit run by volunteers.
AHR43 likes this.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 03-22-2024, 06:38 AM
  #14  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 10,194
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by billdelong
RC is VERY fickle, especially when egos get in the way
No, PEOPLE are very fickle. And we need to understand that

Case in point. I keep mentioning Traction Action, the track near me. Now I don't race there (yet) but I know plenty of people who do so I go to hang out a lot. Even served as Tech Inspector for a couple trophy races.

Over the last couple years I've seen something that simply boggles my mind. There are some racers that will come in, take a look at the current track design, and leave saying "let me know when the track changes, then I'll come back." WHAT!!! And I'm not talking about casual racers. I'm talking about guys who are dedicated to racing. What are they thinking? What makes them think the track will even be there when they decide to come back?

I consider myself dedicated and loyal. Comments like that make me double face palm
fat500 and AHR43 like this.
jiml is offline  
Old 03-22-2024, 06:45 AM
  #15  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 10,194
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by nitrous36
Good read. Race tracks, fullsized or RC, loosing ground to greedy realtors, developers, HOAs, and NIMBYS? One word, boomers.
Er, why are realtors greedy because they want to make money? It's a fact of life that property values change, and taking advantage of that is not greedy. Now it sucks if we lose a track to that, but that's not their fault.

NASCAR didn't sell California Speedway because of greed. They sold it because they weren't selling tickets to the races like they used to. NASCAR dropped places like North Wilksborough and Rockingham because people stopped going there. And next on that list is Bristol.
fat500 likes this.
jiml is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.