![]() |
Originally Posted by mugenb46
warmac, no problem. i'm working on that my self. it's hard to find anyone that will give expierenced advice, you can change timming by port work and crank work i believe. by removing some of the top or bottom of the intake ports on the left and right sides of the sleeve, plus put the downward cut like most people do. i have also seen people make the bottom of the sleeve thinner and round of the bottom of it this will help flow. :sneaky:
Man, it is friking disaster these 2 strock engines. I sugest you drop everything, go to the web, look for any articles about 2 strock engines, regardless if it is for snowmobile, go kart, motorcycle etc. Read everything and try to understand and I ma pretty sure if you want to know you will within 2-3 month. Go to boating and air modeling web sites-those guys put a lot of info on the web. There is actualy whole history of evolution nitro engines with all explanations and details. Just keep reading and understanding. Good luck. |
Originally Posted by mugenb46
nitrodude, why do use the sleeve in that equasion, or maybe i missunderstood. thout you only weigh the conrod and piston with the crank. is there not a device that has two bearings to place the crank with the rod and piston in it like the engine is set up. I'm sorry this description is hard to picture, please explain.
|
edwardn, i will look all this up thanks so much, i'm also looking to find how they balance the cranks after modding, nitrodude gave a way at first i didn't understand i think i may have it know. be cool :sneaky:
|
Originally Posted by lonepalm4
Edwardn: do you know if "rifling" the crank intake has ever been tried by tuners/manufacturers? i know polishing has been done, but i've always thought that if the intake was given a proper rifling, that it could help to force air into the sleeve. just wondering. thanks.
|
is work to the crank done with a dremel or am i looking at some very expensive machinery here
|
Originally Posted by mugenb46
is work to the crank done with a dremel or am i looking at some very expensive machinery here
|
can you help me understand timing on these motors we use for racing,port timming and crank timming, what modding the intake channel on the crank does and making the side ports bigger and the boost port. i also see guys reducing the thickness of the bottom of the sleeve and rounding of the bottom of the sleeve, this must inprove flow of gas and air charge to the cylender yes.
|
LOL My bad, I meant the Piston.
|
I remember now. Another way to do it without the razors. Just get an old crankcase that goes with the crankshaft, and you can use that too. If you go the crankcase way, make sure the theres no oil or grease on the bearings, make sure they're dry.
By the way, i didnt give anything away, I got all that info from EdwardN, there was an old tread where that was discussed, and more. :sneaky: Ed, YGPM |
nitrodude,edwardn you guys are top notch thanks so much look forward to talkin more
|
AND MORE :sneaky:
|
Thanks, but really, Edward is the one that told me how to do it, he deserves all the credit.
|
you cant fully balance a single cylinder engine. Just a FYI
|
Thanks guys, this info is great. Looking forward to anymore you might have to share.
|
Originally Posted by German Muscle
you cant fully balance a single cylinder engine. Just a FYI
Yeah, one cannot fully balance these engines, but isn't the trick trying to get it as close as possible to reduce vibrations and increase efficiency? So we would need some kind of setup (I'm liking the crankcase method) to help us see/measure the amount of balance in the crankshaft, especially since one of it's main functions is to act as a counterweight/counter balance for the conrod & piston. If I said anything wrong will someone please correct me. |
Originally Posted by nitrodude
What you do to balance the crank is, you weigh the sleeve/conrod assembly on a very sensitive scale. Then you take that weight and make a sleeve that fits on the crank pin. Then, you take 2 rasors, and set the crank on top of them, you remove (or add) weight until it fails to stop on the same spot everytime.
nitrodude, do you have a pic of this method? |
nope, im sorry
|
surprisingly most of the engines the factory guys use are not modded. they are all hand matched at the factory. i guess this would mean matching the piston and rod to the crank and also the piston to the sleve.
you would be surprised to see how much extra power you can get :sneaky: although not everyone is a factory driver :sweat: |
warmac....... of coarse he doesn't lol ;)
|
ya.. what the hell you would be suprised how many companies SAY they do that anyway. i bet if i went to novarossi and so did...i don't know josh cyral and both got motors, mine on monday and his on tuesday from the time i pick mine up when i leave the door they are bustin but to make the very best motor for him, not to say novarossi does this because they are bad ass, but i'm sure those pro guys have something done. i bet more do than not. war mac i'm going to build a balencer and i will post it when i'm done. maybe someone can tell me if i did it right, after i spend 20 hours on it lol :sneaky:
|
it's more so the piston to the sleeve :sneaky:
|
Originally Posted by German Muscle
you cant fully balance a single cylinder engine. Just a FYI
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by mugenb46
war mac i'm going to build a balencer and i will post it when i'm done. maybe someone can tell me if i did it right, after i spend 20 hours on it lol :sneaky:
|
Originally Posted by Corse-R
I repeated this until I get hasted of saying it... now, simply I promised to myself to not repeat this phrase. The unique advice I say is to not leave any engine on the hands of someone he's capable of balancing a 1 cilinder engine. because is impossible.
|
thanks dude, cool to see that
|
EdwardN: nice idea, limited machining, good precision.
mugenb46: I guess we are one step closer now. |
Originally Posted by EdwardN
Alfonso, it is impossible to do perfect balancing, but it is possible to come pretty close, specialy when we know our usefull range of RPM (when motor is loaded) is pretty narow-between 26K RPM and 42 K RPM. Yes there is very good balancing numbers which make big difference. Just look any of performace 21 engines-they have tungsten inserts on counter weight-this is done to improve balancing. There are many different ways to improve balancing just need to get hands on it.
|
that makes all the sence in the world to me, dammit i'm pissed thats it i quit lol. but how does it get out of balence from one rpm to another, or is it a harmonic balence, that i know some shit about. when you run 30,000 dollar motors in cup and arca cars they have a range were they perform in the perfect balence around 9000 to 9800 rpm this is short track rpm 6500 to 7500 rpm talledaga or daytona the motor is not in it's harmonic balence range. because of the gear they make us pull :sneaky:
|
yes im pretty sure its harmonic balancing done at the factory, EB Mods claims to balance his this way but its a flat out lie.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by German Muscle
when you balance these motors for an RPM its balanced.....for that RPM. So if you balance it at 38,000 RPM then it will only be in blance there and out of balance everywhere else, you cant balance these motors for a RPM Spectrum. Its a set RPM area as in 1-2K RPM, not 20K. You absolutely can not balance these engines any further than that. Ive seen modders engines vibrate worse on a dyno than stock....and they claimed to fully balance the crankshaft, ive also seen other modders engines act like stock, no one is balancing them, they may put it on a machine that spins it and say the balance it, but its a big BS fest as far as that goes. Trying to balance these engines is a waste of time and money as you cant do it.
I am leaiving this up to you to make judjemnt-if we are doing balancing right or no-you can call it BS, or whatever, it is not really bothering me. I know what we are doing and I know phisical results. Balancing can be done very good and averaged to very wide RPM range. We fly on from 25 K to 42 K and it makes a lot of difference compare to regularly static balanced. We tryed all kind of engines, with all kind of modding. No how much difference it is on performance-this is triky question_ i will leav it up to you to decide. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: If you want to know more obout this talk to Matkemiers brothers-they are really know balancing and they are the mentors on balancing for a lot of engine designers. |
Originally Posted by EdwardN
I am not going to argue with you. You might be right-I don't know on what info you base. I know what we are doing and how we are checking if it is pretty much balanced. On RC cars you can't really feel it-you are far away from thr car and it is moving fast, so there is no way to check it, but I will get back to where I came from, when you fly control line airplane and engine is not balanced then you feel itching on the control line handle. If somebody fly control line airplanes they will know what I am talking about. So we do make design, try it on airplanes, on different range of RPM (Please don't ask how we mesure it-we have way up to 10 RPM accuracy), Then change design and fly again, and agian and again, after couple of tens samles collected, just make analizes and it is pretty much fit to certain system, which just use common sence can be converted to formula.. Then, just one more time control test and it is ready to go. This is the way how we came to the cut on the pic. Sorry for quality of pic, but this the best I could do.
I am leaiving this up to you to make judjemnt-if we are doing balancing right or no-you can call it BS, or whatever, it is not really bothering me. I know what we are doing and I know phisical results. Balancing can be done very good and averaged to very wide RPM range. We fly on from 25 K to 42 K and it makes a lot of difference compare to regularly static balanced. We tryed all kind of engines, with all kind of modding. No how much difference it is on performance-this is triky question_ i will leav it up to you to decide. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: If you want to know more obout this talk to Matkemiers brothers-they are really know balancing and they are the mentors on balancing for a lot of engine designers. |
Originally Posted by German Muscle
Who are you? someone from Axial? All of my information was from Brian Kenny @ Nitrodyne Systems AKA mxwrench on here.
And brian info is absolutly correct we did discause with him this many times, but the difference is that our aplication is slightly different to what you try to bring as sample-motorcycle, so it is different leverages on cranck, diffrent RPM, different ratio HP/capacity etc. In motorsport they develope a lot of really good thing, actauly most o it, but all of them just simply can't be transfered to niro engines.So if any time something is taking from motrsport-there is defenetly need corection to fit our needs in RC |
Originally Posted by German Muscle
Who are you? someone from Axial? All of my information was from Brian Kenny @ Nitrodyne Systems AKA mxwrench on here.
LOL, he is the Designer of Axial engine.. BTW, how u going Ed? drop me a PM or Email if you have time Tommy |
Originally Posted by tl2111
LOL, he is the Designer of Axial engine..
BTW, how u going Ed? drop me a PM or Email if you have time Tommy |
Originally Posted by German Muscle
figures, i dunno why he couldnt say that tho.
RC_Alan |
ED ygPM :sneaky:
|
Originally Posted by rc_alan
He should'nt have too... :tire:
RC_Alan |
does ED have any motors running at the truck nat's
|
Originally Posted by tl2111
LOL, he is the Designer of Axial engine..
|
Edvard has helped me many times when i have asked him and he is very very good at what he is doing.
He does not wan`t to brag of what he is doing and there should be of no difference to you what he does or don`t do. There are a lot of guys out there that know consideral amount of theese engines and they do not come here and talk abaout it bacause thay are alway questioned of what they know. |
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 08:20 AM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.