![]() |
TURBO VS STANDARD GLOW PLUGS
Is there a performance advantage? The standard plugs are so much cheaper.
|
Originally Posted by bluef250
(Post 8326144)
Is there a performance advantage? The standard plugs are so much cheaper.
Price: Not really, cheap plugs are cheaper not matter what kind they are. OD turbos are cheap, GRP standards are expensive. You just see a lot more cheap standards than you do cheap turbos. A good turbo of the right type in a well tuned motor will last longer. So what's cheaper: a $5 plug that lasts 4 tanks or an $11 plug that lasts over a gallon? |
Originally Posted by wingracer
(Post 8326171)
Performance: A bit yes.
So what's cheaper: a $5 plug that lasts 4 tanks or an $11 plug that lasts over a gallon? |
Originally Posted by DJ_Shakespear
(Post 8328860)
The $15 plug that lasts FOREVER!! :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
|
The turbo plug has a better sealing and falls in a perfect shape with the combustion room giving the best compression without distortion of the flow of the mixture. If it does something compared with standard plugs is maybe hard to tell, the change to give it a try can alway give a different compression due the shape and tolerances of the new button head.
I know my 1st TOP engine with (by then) the new turbo plug did give me a lot of problems so I did use a button head of an old engine and normal plugs and did not notice anything but only a better life of the plugs (back in 1994). Today there is no one with an high end top engine even wanting to try a standard plug.... Turbo plugs are patented, that will make a difference in price. Also the shape between brands is not universal to go arround the patent so there is a less choice of plugs compared with the standard plugs which do have more choice in temp range but also more brands making them. |
thanks for the replies. Ill just stick to the turbo plugs
|
More R/C HYPE
In theory the more pent roof/shape charge effect= more HP, but in reality as far as r/c engines, I can't find a differents. I went from standard to turbo in my Nova 367 and losted alot of bottom-end. I went from turbo to standard in my Nova FMS to lower the cooling head and lost no noticeable power. I know turbo plug engines are harder to tune, so that should give you a good indication on how efficient it's combustion chamber is. Just my $.02 |
Originally Posted by topcat-lll
(Post 8336562)
More R/C HYPE
In theory the more pent roof/shape charge effect= more HP, but in reality as far as r/c engines, I can't find a differents. I went from standard to turbo in my Nova 367 and losted alot of bottom-end. I went from turbo to standard in my Nova FMS to lower the cooling head and lost no noticeable power. I know turbo plug engines are harder to tune, so that should give you a good indication on how efficient it's combustion chamber is. Just my $.02 |
Originally Posted by wingracer
(Post 8338627)
Sounds like you were using too cold a plug. Most turbos (even the hot ones) are designed for onroad and just too cold for offroad, thus the poor bottom and difficult tuning. Find a hotter turbo and all will be well.
better, but it was running alittle hot and I think a hotter plug would have made it run too hot. Mostly all todays off-road engines are turbo. I think I seen a dyno test awhile back in a R/C magazine turbo v standard showing a very very slight HP gain in the very extreme top-end, but a slight mid- range lose. |
As I did mention before, the change to another buttonhead can give a change in compression so probebly you have to play with headshims to get the engine right
|
so i have a first gen RB S3 in my sportwerks turmoil it was used about 2 gallons ran thru it and it had a standard plug in it what would da gains be if i switched to a turbo plug or should it have a turbo plug anyways
|
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 09:59 PM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.