Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Mugen JX21

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-13-2008 | 04:18 AM
  #31  
Tech Initiate
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 23
From: Sydney
Default

Hi Guys
If you want an honest opinion of the JX ninja just ask Wayne Walker Mugens Australian factory driver what he thinks, he will tell you there is no comparison between the GRP ninja and the JX ninja.
The JX is easier to tune, has better run time and has more power, he normally runs the c shaped manifold.

Barry.
The Freak is offline  
Old 07-13-2008 | 04:24 AM
  #32  
Tech Initiate
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 23
From: Sydney
Default

Hi Guys
If you want an honest opinion of the JX ninja just ask Wayne Walker Mugens Australian factory driver what he thinks, he will tell you there is no comparison between the GRP ninja and the JX ninja.
The JX is easier to tune, has better run time and has more power, he normally runs the c shaped manifold.

Barry.
The Freak is offline  
Old 07-13-2008 | 11:45 AM
  #33  
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 52
Default

Anyone used the Mugen pipes?

p@dDy
paddyhong is offline  
Old 07-13-2008 | 03:01 PM
  #34  
ezveedub's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,432
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Default

Originally Posted by paddyhong
Anyone used the Mugen pipes?

p@dDy
I think you need to be more specific.
ezveedub is offline  
Old 07-14-2008 | 09:52 AM
  #35  
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 52
Default

http://www.mugenseiki.com/ninja-spec...r-manifold.htm

Are they good? Bad? Too expensive?

p@dDy
paddyhong is offline  
Old 07-14-2008 | 04:00 PM
  #36  
ezveedub's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,432
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Default

Originally Posted by paddyhong
http://www.mugenseiki.com/ninja-spec...r-manifold.htm

Are they good? Bad? Too expensive?

p@dDy
If they are the JX14001 & JX14002 L and C manifolds, I would assume they are the same as the L header from the 2050 OS pipeset and the C shaped from the 2060 OS pipeset. They are very durable IMO if they are the same. Use L shape for more lowend torque and C shaped for smoother power delivery. Mugen only has the EFRA 2042 pipe listed (OS 2060 pipe)
ezveedub is offline  
Old 07-15-2008 | 03:45 PM
  #37  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 176
From: Lancashire, UK
Default

My JX21 landed today and I have to say that the first impressions are superb, typical OS manufacturing quality and internally everything looks spot on! With abit of luck I'll get her fired up and running for a few tanks tomorrow, can't wait.
Ashalak is offline  
Old 07-22-2008 | 04:31 AM
  #38  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 183
Default

Has anyone used the OS plugs on this engine?
joydude630 is offline  
Old 07-22-2008 | 06:43 AM
  #39  
Slippery's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 563
From: Gympie
Default

have used OS plugs identical just different packaging
Slippery is offline  
Old 07-22-2008 | 06:53 AM
  #40  
wingracer's Avatar
Tech Lord
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,767
Default

Originally Posted by joydude630
Has anyone used the OS plugs on this engine?
Since it is an OS made motor I would think OS plugs would be the best choice.

Could be wrong though since I don't have one yet.
wingracer is offline  
Old 07-22-2008 | 04:51 PM
  #41  
ezveedub's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,432
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Default

The OS plugs are the same. Ninja has P3 & P4 plugs listed, but from what I have been reading, it seems P3 or P6 are the plugs to use depending on conditions.
ezveedub is offline  
Old 07-22-2008 | 10:35 PM
  #42  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 183
Default

How does this engine compare with the expensive motors?
joydude630 is offline  
Old 07-28-2008 | 07:53 AM
  #43  
lorinser999's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 213
From: User is Online
Default jx21

Originally Posted by TonysScrews
I found the JX-21 to be easier to break in and get a tune on it. It has better bottom-end. GRP is a bit smoother. Run time and top end is too early to compare.
Yah right sir,with running time of 11mins 30,great engine!
lorinser999 is offline  
Old 07-28-2008 | 07:56 AM
  #44  
lorinser999's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 213
From: User is Online
Default p3/p4

[QUOTE=joydude630;4661446]Has anyone used the OS plugs on this engine?[/QUOTE
Ive tried p3/p4,p3 runs great!
lorinser999 is offline  
Old 07-28-2008 | 08:53 AM
  #45  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 183
Default

Originally Posted by joydude630
How does this engine compare with the expensive motors?
Anyone
joydude630 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.