Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro Off-Road
Hot Bodies D815 Tessmann Worlds Edition >

Hot Bodies D815 Tessmann Worlds Edition

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree5Likes

Hot Bodies D815 Tessmann Worlds Edition

    Hide Wikipost
Old 02-06-2017, 04:52 AM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Hot Bodies D815 Tessmann Worlds Edition
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: My ST-RR EVO
This is some setup advice for those new to this platform and in need of setup help. After being on this thread, the D812 thread, the E817 thread and at the track, the common gripe that is frustrating to some people is that the rear end of this car is too loose, but praise it for a lot of steering. It usually starts with, "I put Ty Tessmann's 2015 DNC setup on..." Others will swear that setup is super stable and easy to drive. The better of a driver a person is, the harder it is for them to relate to a newer driver's complaint. The issue lies in the setup + the track condition + driver skill. Ty Tessmann has special skills and can successfully exploit maximum performance out of a weird handling car that lesser drivers (i.e. all the people complaining about it) cannot.

The first thing you need to do is evaluate your track. Your track is rather loose if it has independent particles of dirt sitting on top of the harder under layer that always continues to break up feeding a never ending supply of independent dirt particles back up to the surface which doesn't allow a clean racing line to form. If your track has a clean racing line it's probably medium or higher grip. This is generally speaking. Weather or watering can change the track's grip level. Concrete, astro turf, combination surfaces, grass, carpet etc I have no experience with. I'll get to clay later. Use the right tire with a compound matched to the temperature. This setup info isn't intended to get every last 1/10 second out of you and your car (because I can't do that from a keyboard), but it'll get you more satisfaction and less frustration out of your car.

If your track is of the looser variety, there is a higher probability that one of Ty's setup will seem to work better and be less tail happy. The reason is because there is a lot of body roll on the rear. You can liken this a loaded van with worn out shocks. You go into a turn and it leans a lot. On a loose track you need the lean to pressurize the outside tires down into the dirt. They will grip better. The 2015 DNC set up achieves this with light shock oil 30 front / 25 rear (car pitches forward and back and leans left and right freely, just like a loaded van with worn out shocks). Granted, shock oil is temperature dependent. If it's an 80*F+ day, this oil will feel light. The links on the towers are up quite high. The high links produce more body roll. The original D815 came with #3 rear camber plates which further causes body roll as compared to the #5 plates included with the D815 Version 2. The front link is short which resists deep roll, which under acceleration out of a turn transfers weight to the rear outside tire. The rear link is long which allows the rear to roll deeply. The rear hubs are all the way down which further causes more roll. The most critical area though, are the pills in the C and D block. 2 dots up on each means the hinge pin sits almost as low as it can go. It can only go one increment lower. The lower the hinge pins sits, the more the chassis will roll. The 124mm of rear droop allows the car to lean a lot before the droop screw stops the roll and the 2.4mm rear sway bar doesn't do much to stop all the leaning. So if you're on a loose surface, good. You'll have plenty of leaning to help force the outside rear tire down into the dirt to get traction. What happens when you're on a medium grip track and you're not super smooth on the throttle and steering input? Under ham fisted acceleration and cranking of the wheel, the weight very quickly transfers to the outside rear tire, overloads it causing loss of grip and the car spins. Coming out of a hairpin, this is probably where it'll end because you're not going very fast. If you're already up to a certain amount of speed, turning onto the straight and punch it, you'll still start to spin. If you try and correct by letting off the gas and counter-steering, the weight very quickly transfers (light shocks not damping much) to the front outside tire which bites hard (due to lots of caster and 2.2 front sway bar) and sends the light rear the other way. You correct left, you correct right. Next thing you know you're in a tank slapper situation. The light diff oil also plays a roll in this. 5k front and 2k rear gives the car a lot of steering off power. Basically the entire setup on a medium grip track will give you tons of front end steering into the corner and tons off oversteer on exit and that is what the newer drivers complain about.

What you need to do is control the amount of body roll to match your abilities and track's level of grip. Fortunately the 2015 DNC setup is a great starting point. The front end is mostly going to be fine. A 2.4mm front sway bar will make the car easier to drive though as it'll smooth out the steering. Remember I said the critical area for adjustment are the pills in the C and D block? Raise the hinge pins in them! They have a larger roll center adjustment effect than any other adjustment in the rear. Go straight to 1 dot up in the C block and 1 dot down in the D block. Don't forget to re-adjust droop and ride height. If it's an 80*F day, bump your shock oil up to at least 32.5 / 27.5 if not 35 / 30 (based on TLR oils). A 2.6 rear sway bar and lowering the rear upper link should be tried. I like thicker diffs (7k/5k/3k - Kyosho) and I feel they definitely aid in smoothness, drivability and ham fisted operation, but not everyone does. Try the first five adjustments first as they take the least amount of time to do. What you should notice now is that your D815 is smoother and easier to drive. The rear will be easier to control with the throttle. Smoothness in your driving is key to controlling how the car pitches around.

The original D815 setup at the back of the manual needs the carbon inserts in the rear arms, longer rear upper link, #5 rear camber plate and thicker diff oil. Kit shock oil is already specified at 32.5 / 27.5, but as stated above, the hotter the ambient temperature is the thicker the oil you'll need. The C and D block pill orientation (2 dots up / 1 dot up) raises the hinge pins higher than the DNC setup so you might be ok depending on how much grip your track has, but don't hesitate to change them to raise the hinge higher if the car still has squirmy handling. 2.4 mm front and 2.6 mm rear sway bars are already specified. Yes, there are still differences between the setup in this paragraph and the one above, but these changes matter the most.

The D815 Version 2 kit setup vs the DNC setup already specifies a lot of the stuff I mentioned like thicker diffs (rear is 1k thinner), carbon arm inserts, 1 dot down on D block (but C block pill hole should be raised), low link on the rear tower, #5 rear camber plate, long rear upper link, thick shock oil (40 / 35) for the temp they specify (20*C / 68*F) with their selected pistons 1.5x5 front / 1.6x5 rear and thicker sway bars. The D815V2 kit setup shouldn't need a lot of variance to get nice handling. C block pill change + rear diff oil and it should be stable and predictable.

The E817 kit setup looks mostly good, but once again the C and D block pills need the holes raised and diffs should be thicker. Make sure your shocks aren't too soft for the temperature you're driving in. Consider thicker front and rear sway bars, rear especially.

The lower grip your track is, the lower the rear inner hinge pins should be, the lighter diffs and the lighter the sway bars should be. The higher the grip, the higher the rear inner hinge pin should be, the thicker the diffs, the heavier the sway bars should be. Shock oil has to match the temperature. Do not automatically assume a loose rear end means the track is loose. Assess your dirt!

Lastly, after you get your D815 handling smoothly everything mentioned can adjusted to dial the handling in as can all the other setup parameters not mentioned. Setup can be confusing, so post any questions and I'll do my best to answer. Track types (very tight, bigger, bumpier, jump size, very high grip, layout style) can all warrant some changes.

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2016, 08:57 PM
  #2461  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by gilbertfg
I just hope they don't put the D817 yet, I just purchased the V2 LOL...
I doubt they will release a 'D817' until 2018. They may announce it late 2017 but, from what I hear, 2017 will introduce revisions to the two 1/10th scale vehicles they currently have released. Later this year will be the release of the E817 to finish the 1/8th buggy classes. I agree with you though, I hate it when you buy a kit, it arrives, and then they announce the new one for barely more money lol.

I think rc is getting to the point where yearly releases are not a smart business move, maybe I'm wrong though.
WillT is offline  
Old 10-31-2016, 05:04 AM
  #2462  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 580
Default

Originally Posted by WillT
I think rc is getting to the point where yearly releases are not a smart business move, maybe I'm wrong though.
I think you may be wrong as well. Same way we don't need a new phone every six months but as consumers we like new stuff and new products drive sales.
Eastside777 is offline  
Old 10-31-2016, 05:26 AM
  #2463  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 580
Default

I aslo think HB should try and capitalize off the Worlds win while it's still fresh. Release the Ronnefalk package (currently we cannot buy all the parts used) as all it takes is poor finishes at the first 2 big races of next year for people to start having second thoughts.
Eastside777 is offline  
Old 10-31-2016, 09:23 AM
  #2464  
Tech Master
 
rosko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,088
Default

Originally Posted by Eastside777
I aslo think HB should try and capitalize off the Worlds win while it's still fresh. Release the Ronnefalk package (currently we cannot buy all the parts used) as all it takes is poor finishes at the first 2 big races of next year for people to start having second thoughts.
Very true.....hb needs to be gettin while the gettin is good and fresh in peoples minds..the longer they wait nothings gonna change...if they're timid the consumers will be timid to buy..
rosko is offline  
Old 10-31-2016, 09:39 AM
  #2465  
Tech Master
 
rosko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,088
Default

At the worlds I'd say the three cars that stood out most was David's HB, Davide O. Mugen, and Boots tki4, if one of those companies announce a release of a worlds kit HB should be announcing a worlds kit as well if not before than just days after because if they wait or stay silent then most people would be happy having any of those three cars and this is mainly for gettin new customers or returning customers and not losing your current customers....
rosko is offline  
Old 10-31-2016, 08:18 PM
  #2466  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by Eastside777
I think you may be wrong as well. Same way we don't need a new phone every six months but as consumers we like new stuff and new products drive sales.
I don't disagree that we like new products, but I think that the business model of yearly releases (I suppose we could call it full platform releases) is outdated and not financially viable. That is probably why you don't see, for example, a D815, D816, D817, 8ight 3.0/4.0/5.0 every single year. Instead, you see small innovations that you can add onto your current vehicle. Then eventually, when the advances are significant and plentiful enough, they will release a full vehicle. You are correct, however, that phones are largely done as yearly releases (or quicker). One of the differences is that RC has significantly less market impact because of its niche demographic. For example, RC developers can't afford to buy new molds every year. I wish RC was big enough to do that though haha. Also, RC doesn't have a monthly fee type system that allows us to get free RC cars to sign up for 2 years (or anything similar). Keep in mind that I am specifically talking about full platform releases and not small upgrades. My original post was responding to someone that asked if a completely new car would be coming out, I don't think there will be. You never know though...not every company will follow the same business model...
WillT is offline  
Old 10-31-2016, 08:39 PM
  #2467  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (31)
 
wombat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 955
Trader Rating: 31 (100%+)
Default

You cant compare the infinite technological advancement and subsequent releases of new model phones to RC car development changes - has nothing to do with RC being a niche market (even though it is)

Technological advances for phones (or computers/other electronics for that matter) are moving in leaps and bounds - rc cars (in this case 1/8 nitro) are still the same fundamental design (4 wheels, driveshaft drivetrains etc) many years on....
wombat is offline  
Old 10-31-2016, 09:15 PM
  #2468  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (31)
 
wombat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 955
Trader Rating: 31 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by WillT
I think that the business model of yearly releases (I suppose we could call it full platform releases) is outdated and not financially viable.
The only company that has ever done this (yearly update) is XRAY. No other companies utilise this 'yearly' business model.
wombat is offline  
Old 11-01-2016, 12:42 AM
  #2469  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by wombat
You cant compare the infinite technological advancement and subsequent releases of new model phones to RC car development changes - has nothing to do with RC being a niche market (even though it is)

Technological advances for phones (or computers/other electronics for that matter) are moving in leaps and bounds - rc cars (in this case 1/8 nitro) are still the same fundamental design (4 wheels, driveshaft drivetrains etc) many years on....
I agree with you that the comparison is not equivalent. The tech industry is an entirely different type of monster. However, I don't think it's realistic to say that it has absolutely nothing to do with RC being a niche market. Much of any market's advancement is driven out of necessity. Necessity is largely influenced by the money to be made in an industry. If RC had 80% of the population participating on a regular basis instead of less than 1%, there would be faster advancement as demand increased. I still don't think it would move at the same pace as the tech fields but it would increase the pace of advancement (in comparison to now) as resources became available (i.e. money and demand).

You also have a really good point that the fundamental design remains fairly intact as well. I think some industries just have more easily understood paths for advancements. Only so many ways you can reinvent the wheel right? haha. I guess it puts a lot of truth to the statement "tried and true" since we have stuck to the same basic design for so many years. It's truly exciting to see the innovation some of these companies, like HB racing, can come up with at this stage of RC development. Great talent for sure!
WillT is offline  
Old 11-01-2016, 12:52 AM
  #2470  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by wombat
The only company that has ever done this (yearly update) is XRAY. No other companies utilise this 'yearly' business model.
I didn't know X-Ray did yearly releases, very interesting. I wonder what circumstances have given them the ability to do this.

Personally, I like getting a slew of small upgrades for 2-3 years and then a new platform integrating them all into a single kit. The micro transaction business model has also proven to be very successful in several industries. It makes sense why so many companies release parts constantly as they continue research over a period of several years.

What are X-Ray vehicles like in comparison to some of the other popular ones? I've never owned one and haven't really had my ear to the ground to know anything about them.
WillT is offline  
Old 11-01-2016, 01:20 AM
  #2471  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 608
Default

Originally Posted by WillT
I didn't know X-Ray did yearly releases, very interesting. I wonder what circumstances have given them the ability to do this.

Personally, I like getting a slew of small upgrades for 2-3 years and then a new platform integrating them all into a single kit. The micro transaction business model has also proven to be very successful in several industries. It makes sense why so many companies release parts constantly as they continue research over a period of several years.

What are X-Ray vehicles like in comparison to some of the other popular ones? I've never owned one and haven't really had my ear to the ground to know anything about them.
xray yearly updates are pointless imo.
itīs a big marketing movement and in this "all-new" and "luxury" things are complete over the top.
after several xray trys, most fun i had with their product presentation sites.

but... sorry for going to xray here.
gt racing is offline  
Old 11-01-2016, 01:46 AM
  #2472  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,876
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

@Rosko- yes those manufacturers stood out. Cavalieri's B3 was supposed to start second on the grid so that's something too. If i was running any of those companies, from the keyboard jockey standpoint, I'd have a World's Edition car ready to go b4 the Worlds even started, then release it right after. Literally the next day. You could argue they wouldn't know the final parts drivers were going to use and therefore couldn't do it, but maybe have most all of the parts already loaded in the box, then after they find out what option parts were used, make up a bag of those and toss 'em in, seal the box and off they go.
My ST-RR EVO is offline  
Old 11-01-2016, 01:52 AM
  #2473  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,876
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Eastside777
I also think HB should try and capitalize off the Worlds win while it's still fresh. Release the Ronnefalk package (currently we cannot buy all the parts used) as all it takes is poor finishes at the first 2 big races of next year for people to start having second thoughts.
+10
My ST-RR EVO is offline  
Old 11-01-2016, 03:58 AM
  #2474  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: My house.
Posts: 3,569
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by My ST-RR EVO
@Rosko- yes those manufacturers stood out. Cavalieri's B3 was supposed to start second on the grid so that's something too. If i was running any of those companies, from the keyboard jockey standpoint, I'd have a World's Edition car ready to go b4 the Worlds even started, then release it right after. Literally the next day. You could argue they wouldn't know the final parts drivers were going to use and therefore couldn't do it, but maybe have most all of the parts already loaded in the box, then after they find out what option parts were used, make up a bag of those and toss 'em in, seal the box and off they go.
I think Mugen and AE had the most box stock cars, if we except HB using the D817. Kyosho is two parts (the +2mm tower and holder) away from a WC version if we keep the TKI4 front end.

HB has the E817 and D817 almost ready and I think they are going to launch them at the same time in the very near future.
30Tooth is offline  
Old 11-01-2016, 04:14 AM
  #2475  
Tech Master
 
rosko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,088
Default

Originally Posted by My ST-RR EVO
@Rosko- yes those manufacturers stood out. Cavalieri's B3 was supposed to start second on the grid so that's something too. If i was running any of those companies, from the keyboard jockey standpoint, I'd have a World's Edition car ready to go b4 the Worlds even started, then release it right after. Literally the next day. You could argue they wouldn't know the final parts drivers were going to use and therefore couldn't do it, but maybe have most all of the parts already loaded in the box, then after they find out what option parts were used, make up a bag of those and toss 'em in, seal the box and off they go.
I agree 100%..
rosko is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.