Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro Off-Road
Steering servo, how much torque/speed? >

Steering servo, how much torque/speed?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Steering servo, how much torque/speed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2012, 05:38 PM
  #31  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
merdith6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brazoria, TX
Posts: 2,350
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default Yep

I use the cs-170 and it's lasted longer than any other servo in steering that I have used in 20 years of nitro buggy. The gears are really long lasting. after 2 years it has only a very small ammount of tic in them, and still works flawlessly. Money saver for sure.
merdith6 is offline  
Old 08-28-2012, 01:23 AM
  #32  
Tech Master
iTrader: (21)
 
So*Cal AFDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Moreno Valley
Posts: 1,454
Trader Rating: 21 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Sideshow Bob
the 1258 should not be used on steering
I contest. I used a 1258tg as steering in my 8ight 2.0 for 2 seasons with no issues. Enough holding strength, and strong enough to withstand 2 seasons of abuse WITH the servo saver locked out. Gave the servo to my dad after getting my Radiopost; He has been running it in his 1/10 buggy for over a year.

Now I would recommend a RP multi type due to being faster and smoother. And almost bullet proof. Also they are LIPO ready.
So*Cal AFDude is offline  
Old 08-28-2012, 01:38 AM
  #33  
Tech Master
 
Sideshow Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Africa
Posts: 1,056
Default

Originally Posted by So*Cal AFDude
I contest. I used a 1258tg as steering in my 8ight 2.0 for 2 seasons with no issues. Enough holding strength, and strong enough to withstand 2 seasons of abuse WITH the servo saver locked out. Gave the servo to my dad after getting my Radiopost; He has been running it in his 1/10 buggy for over a year.

Now I would recommend a RP multi type due to being faster and smoother. And almost bullet proof. Also they are LIPO ready.
the only reason why i say that is I read somewhere on the mugen thread that a failed 1258 on steering had Savox refuse replacement since it was not designed for 1/8th offroad steering applications..or something in that line. honestly if i had to due to whatever reason ill also use one on steering..it has plenty
Sideshow Bob is offline  
Old 08-29-2012, 08:25 PM
  #34  
Tech Master
iTrader: (21)
 
Rsickles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 1,337
Trader Rating: 21 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Zerodefect
Chances are the CS-170 became a rebadged 7955 when hitec ran out of 5955's.
If this is true, then the CS-170 should work with the Hitec programmers - which to my knowledge, none of the new CS-170's do.

If the 170 was 'upgraded' with newer circuitry and programmable, then I'm betting it's probably the same as the 7954, which still isn't the 7955.
Rsickles is offline  
Old 08-29-2012, 08:35 PM
  #35  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (7)
 
jmaxey51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 3,917
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Rsickles
If this is true, then the CS-170 should work with the Hitec programmers - which to my knowledge, none of the new CS-170's do.

If the 170 was 'upgraded' with newer circuitry and programmable, then I'm betting it's probably the same as the 7954, which still isn't the 7955.
the 54 is the 55 with steel gears. the thing is that if you like the 7955 run it but the CS170 is the same thing but cheaper (hitec will not say it because theirs is more and wants to sell it, more profit). the cs170 have changed in the past year......
jmaxey51 is offline  
Old 08-29-2012, 09:01 PM
  #36  
Tech Master
iTrader: (21)
 
Rsickles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 1,337
Trader Rating: 21 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by jmaxey51
the 54 is the 55 with steel gears. the thing is that if you like the 7955 run it but the CS170 is the same thing but cheaper (hitec will not say it because theirs is more and wants to sell it, more profit). the cs170 have changed in the past year......
7955 and 7954 have different motor and circuitry. The specs are just estimates.

If there's a "new" CS-170, it would likely be 7954 with ti gearset... if it's even programmable.
Rsickles is offline  
Old 08-30-2012, 08:33 PM
  #37  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (148)
 
Frank L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
Posts: 12,520
Trader Rating: 148 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by chopper82p
80oz is too low for buggy.

150oz minimum, speed .15 or faster
+1 on this should be the starting point.


If you want the best then go KO rsx. They will break the bank but be trouble free for a long while. I even had a rep from brand X tell me (quietly) that they were working on coming out with a servo along the same like as the rsx but they are not there yet.
Frank L is offline  
Old 08-30-2012, 09:52 PM
  #38  
Suspended
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,012
Trader Rating: 7 (73%+)
Default

im happy with my 403oz of torque hitech 7954 on throttle and brake
rcuser567345 is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.