OS 2060 / Ninja 2042 pipe
#1
A lot of times it has been asked what pipes goes well with XXX engine,
But now I'm gonna ask the other way round..
What engines performs well with the OS 2060 and Ninja 2042 pipe?
Reason is that I'm in the market for a new engine but I have 2 sets of the Ninja 2042..
Been running a V-Spec and the JX and now I'm looking to try other engines.
I'm looking at the Reedy motor, RB Rally 9, or the Team Orion ABI..
Any other recommendations?
Btw I have a JP B5 that is being rebuild, would the Ninja pipe be a good match for the JP?
Thanks in advance guys!
But now I'm gonna ask the other way round..
What engines performs well with the OS 2060 and Ninja 2042 pipe?
Reason is that I'm in the market for a new engine but I have 2 sets of the Ninja 2042..
Been running a V-Spec and the JX and now I'm looking to try other engines.
I'm looking at the Reedy motor, RB Rally 9, or the Team Orion ABI..
Any other recommendations?
Btw I have a JP B5 that is being rebuild, would the Ninja pipe be a good match for the JP?
Thanks in advance guys!
#5
Mont runtime is the OS 2060, BTW its the exact same pipe as the Mugen 2042, I have them both and they are identical. I put a 2050 on my truggy this weekend and it gor 2 mins less on the track I was on from last week with a 2060. The track is small so runtimes are usually up. 2060 gets better runtime no questions.
#6
Mont runtime is the OS 2060, BTW its the exact same pipe as the Mugen 2042, I have them both and they are identical. I put a 2050 on my truggy this weekend and it gor 2 mins less on the track I was on from last week with a 2060. The track is small so runtimes are usually up. 2060 gets better runtime no questions.
But yes Frank, I agree that the 2060 is better for milage. I might say that it could be as much as a minute or so, but 2 minutes might be a bit high. Thats atleast 20% or more.
But you could change some of this based on the header.
#7
Tech Adept
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 194
Mont runtime is the OS 2060, BTW its the exact same pipe as the Mugen 2042, I have them both and they are identical. I put a 2050 on my truggy this weekend and it gor 2 mins less on the track I was on from last week with a 2060. The track is small so runtimes are usually up. 2060 gets better runtime no questions.
#9
I have never been able to really prove or even find any facts about how the shape affects the power curve. Not saying that it is not there, just havn't seen it. I have many shapes of headers, but usually go by over-all length to use on the basis for tuning
#11
http://www.amainhobbies.com/product_...-Road-Manifold
#12
Or you meant that you put the Speed on a GRP pipe??
Sorry for the confusion..

Anyway pls update if you're gonna try another engine with the 2060/2042 pipe.
Tks!
#13
Based on what Savoya was running at the Worlds, I'd think that most runtime with the Ninja JX wld be the old Ninja FLS pipe made by GRP..
OS 2050 has the worst runtime, very punchy powerband.
2060/2042 compromise bet power (still great and smoother power) and runtime but I know some are easily getting 9-9.30mins with the JX..
#14
Ok guys here you go. Its a mugen L shaped header and it works well in a truggy. Check it out.
http://tonysscrews.com/product.sc?pr...&categoryId=-1
http://tonysscrews.com/product.sc?pr...&categoryId=-1




