Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro Off-Road
New Losi 8ight 2.0! >

New Losi 8ight 2.0!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

New Losi 8ight 2.0!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2008, 08:23 AM
  #31  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (86)
 
Davidka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,883
Trader Rating: 86 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by largeorangefont
Looks like the old Schumacher 4wd electric buggies. It will suck on American tracks just like the Schumachers did.
Lay down shocks don't indicate anything about performance at a glance. Notice the mounts that are used on the front arms? They change the geometry so that the "actual" leverage on the front shocks is more similar to a stand up shock.

A couple of cars that use a similar configuration: AE RC10gt2 and AE RC8, And to a lesser degree the Losi XXXnt (has risers on the rear arm/shock mounts) none of which suck on US style tracks. I think the RC8 is sitting 2nd qualifier at the US nats right now.

This car seems to lean more towards faster, smoother tracks but with some adjustments these concepts could work very well in the US too.
Davidka is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 12:10 AM
  #32  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (7)
 
air8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hutch, KS
Posts: 5,748
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by LosiMadMan
The diffs, arms, bulkheads, steering rack,center diff, chassis, are all Losi to name a few. I just got tired of listing stuff.
Do you think the diffs are Losi diffs. To me the look different. I mean, I know they made changes to use the larger bearings and all. IDK. I just figured Pamilio came up with their own mold and made new diffs.
air8 is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 07:02 AM
  #33  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (86)
 
Davidka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,883
Trader Rating: 86 (100%+)
Default

That would be unlikely. Molding costs are pretty high, far to high to make molds for a prototype car. They would more likely use CNC aluminum for the prototype cases and only make molds if they were 100% sure that they were going into production.
Davidka is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 07:34 AM
  #34  
Tech Addict
 
Powerlink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: so Cal.
Posts: 603
Default

It looks like they used front suspension arms on the rear .That would be cool having to only carry one type of arm for replacement time.
Powerlink is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 07:48 AM
  #35  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (86)
 
Davidka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,883
Trader Rating: 86 (100%+)
Default

Ha ha! I hadn't even considered that! Good catch! I think the purpose of that was to get lower shock mount positions farther inboard.
Davidka is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 09:04 AM
  #36  
Suspended
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 367
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

If they were trying to make the 8ight look as ugly as possible, they did a damn good job of that.

And again, those hinge pin collars suck...
Nay0k is offline  
Old 06-08-2008, 09:26 AM
  #37  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (8)
 
Integra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,489
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Nay0k
If they were trying to make the 8ight look as ugly as possible, they did a damn good job of that.

And again, those hinge pin collars suck...




X2
Integra is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.