![]() |
Woud the price tag be the same as the v5?
|
yep it will be around the same price
|
|
Originally Posted by transplantlife
(Post 12551100)
http://www.rctech.net/forum/12549255-post100.html http://www.rctech.net/forum/12549271-post101.html |
Not sure what everyone expected? A shaft down the middle maybe?
The new plastics and revised geometry are what I'm most excited about, bring on December! :tire: |
It is about what i expected, but I was hoping for a bit more.:D
It seems they have eliminated the middle inner camber link location. Any reason they limited the car to long or short links? |
Originally Posted by CraigM
(Post 12551266)
Not sure what everyone expected? A shaft down the middle maybe?
The new plastics and revised geometry are what I'm most excited about, bring on December! :tire: |
Originally Posted by CraigM
(Post 12551266)
Not sure what everyone expected? A shaft down the middle maybe?
The new plastics and revised geometry are what I'm most excited about, bring on December! :tire: Not needs, per se, but nice to haves. Gear diff. Durable c-hubs. Plastic retaining clips for the battery. Sway bar mounts that key into the bulkheads so they don't slide around. Tougher 1pc arm mounts. Little things. Not purely necessary, and maybe not required on every style of track. The nice to haves that you can get with other brands on the market. Those were my hopes. If the 418 dominates on the track like the 416 used to, those things won't matter. I'm a Tamiya fan boy, but I've been spoiled by other brands that get the little things just right, and those little conveniences and refinement add up to enough of a difference that my loyalties remain elsewhere. Anyway, good luck to the future 418 owners, I hope the car is stunning on the track. Because I need an excuse to buy one, the pictures alone are unconvincing. For now, I wait. |
Originally Posted by CraigM
(Post 12551266)
Not sure what everyone expected? A shaft down the middle maybe?
The new plastics and revised geometry are what I'm most excited about, bring on December! :tire: I expected Tamiya to be a leader instead of a follower! They are playing catch up and it shows in the 418. The car is uninspired and is missing upgrades in the right places...I guess time will tell if the car is better or not. Tamiya used to be the gold standard and now Tamiya looks like the cheap Yokomo Knock-off! |
Originally Posted by artwork
(Post 12551316)
Tamiya used to be the gold standard and now Tamiya looks like the cheap Yokomo Knock-off!
|
Originally Posted by artwork
(Post 12551316)
I am personally pretty disappointed by what I see.
I expected Tamiya to be a leader instead of a follower! They are playing catch up and it shows in the 418. The car is uninspired and is missing upgrades in the right places...I guess time will tell if the car is better or not. Tamiya used to be the gold standard and now Tamiya looks like the cheap Yokomo Knock-off! |
Originally Posted by Csaari77
(Post 12551291)
It is about what i expected, but I was hoping for a bit more.:D
It seems they have eliminated the middle inner camber link location. Any reason they limited the car to long or short links? |
If the shocks aren't shorter I wonder why they have used the low profile spring collar :confused:
http://www.rctech.net/forum/attachme...rf418-418c.jpg |
Originally Posted by CraigM
(Post 12551372)
If the shocks aren't shorter I wonder why they have used the low profile spring collar :confused:
http://www.rctech.net/forum/attachme...rf418-418c.jpg |
Looks like the car has HPI-style springs on it and those are the large diameter retainers, not short shocks and 1mm down retainers.
|
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 08:09 PM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.