Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree6280Likes

USGT

    Hide Wikipost
Old 08-12-2017, 12:28 PM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: USGT
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: DARKSIDE
USIC USGT 2016 Motor and Chassis list in qualifing order

TQ A.F. TSR A800
2nd D.J. TeamPowers A800
3rd B.S. TSR A800
4th M.L. TSR A800
5th M.F TeamPowers A800
6th D.J TSR Destiny
7th J.W. Trinity Monster '17 Xray
8th C.V TSR Destiny
9 A.C. TSR A700
10 B.K. R1 v15 A700
11
12
13 J.L. TSR A800
14 M.L. TSR Destiny
15
16 J.M. TSR. 15 Xray
17
18 R.C. TSR T4
19 M.K. Reedy Powered M3 AE TC7
20 S.J. TSR Destiny
21
22 E.S. motiv T4
23
24
25
26 P.D. TSR Destiny
27
28
29
30 V.P. Reedy M3 serpent 3.0
31
32
33
34
35 Y.B. Fantom A800
36
37
38 R.C. TSR A800
39
40 W.S. Reedy
41
42
43 Motiv xray
44
45
46 Motiv Xray
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-2021, 02:40 PM
  #10306  
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Kregger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,589
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Isn't that standard TC weight as well?
Kregger is offline  
Old 03-09-2021, 02:53 PM
  #10307  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: CT
Posts: 305
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Roar changed it to 1320.
V8 Rumble is offline  
Old 03-09-2021, 02:53 PM
  #10308  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chi-Town West Burbs
Posts: 1,806
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Kregger
Isn't that standard TC weight as well?
ROAR dropped the weight of Touring Car to 1320gms.

Last edited by mooby64; 03-18-2021 at 10:23 AM.
mooby64 is offline  
Old 03-09-2021, 03:00 PM
  #10309  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
OSherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: o0O In the FishBowl O0o
Posts: 3,602
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

I personally don't understand the weight 'decrease' for such a class..

effectively alienating the 'older cars' and Tub-chassis that most the people I read are wanting to start running in the class.


$0.02
Kregger and rcguyfpr like this.
OSherman is offline  
Old 03-09-2021, 05:38 PM
  #10310  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 122
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

On the other hand, spend $700+ on new kit, then spend $100+ on weights getting it up to weight. My car needs 150G+ to get up to weight, not easy to stuff just any ol weight in there. Need the special made weights for the chassis as its already cramped.
AsphaltFlyer is offline  
Old 03-10-2021, 08:06 AM
  #10311  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
OSherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: o0O In the FishBowl O0o
Posts: 3,602
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

You can always add ballast.. The real issue is that you don't want to add it in the 'other' spaces available.

Under the battery, the front bumper, atop the servo and under the speedo has loads of real estate..

RC MAKER, XRAY, TAMIYA and others make some nice slim ballast bits for such other places
OSherman is offline  
Old 03-10-2021, 08:39 AM
  #10312  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
mrreet2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 2,043
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by OSherman
I personally don't understand the weight 'decrease' for such a class..

effectively alienating the 'older cars' and Tub-chassis that most the people I read are wanting to start running in the class.

$0.02
Are they really going to be competitive in a field of late model XRAY's, Awesomematics and Serpents?
mrreet2001 is offline  
Old 03-10-2021, 08:56 AM
  #10313  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
OSherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: o0O In the FishBowl O0o
Posts: 3,602
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

with all these excuses, we may never know..

Raman likes this.
OSherman is offline  
Old 03-10-2021, 10:02 AM
  #10314  
Tech Addict
 
DaSilva3525's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 528
Default

There are more people owning newer kits (2014-2021) That have to add a lot of weight versus a bunch of people running vintage kit's trying to remove weight..
DaSilva3525 is offline  
Old 03-10-2021, 10:14 AM
  #10315  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
mrreet2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 2,043
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by OSherman
with all these excuses, we may never know..
Were they actually competitive before the weight drop that just happened?

Heck lets ban mid motor, lipos and brushless motors just incase someone shows up with an HPI Pro2 they had in the closet from 20 years ago. Things change, products evolve. At the end of the day you can pick up a cheap TC that's not a pig or a tub for real cheap. (x-press, sakura). No one is saying you can't run a heavy car in USGT, but everyone else shouldn't be penalized because you chose the wrong chassis. To me that sound like an excuse.
DaSilva3525 and thirtydaZe like this.
mrreet2001 is offline  
Old 03-10-2021, 10:36 AM
  #10316  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
DARKSIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville-Memphis
Posts: 9,619
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

wow... damn if you do damn if you dont... new weight is 1350... 30 grams less... are we good now?
mariob62 likes this.
DARKSIDE is offline  
Old 03-10-2021, 10:37 AM
  #10317  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
OSherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: o0O In the FishBowl O0o
Posts: 3,602
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Part of the spirit of the class is about 'an even playing field'... or am I mistaken?

Regardless which chassis you choose, it must make weight.. Can be argued both ways. But the fact remains its very difficult to remove weight from a car that is inherently 'very heavy'. TC-01 for example drives like a dream with the rite setup.. But very porky.
Raman likes this.
OSherman is offline  
Old 03-10-2021, 10:40 AM
  #10318  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
DARKSIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville-Memphis
Posts: 9,619
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

TC7.2 is 3+ years old... and I do fine with it in USGT and 21.5 TC.... weight or no weight, and still win at times

Raman likes this.
DARKSIDE is offline  
Old 03-10-2021, 10:49 AM
  #10319  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
OSherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: o0O In the FishBowl O0o
Posts: 3,602
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

The 'new guy' (whom supposedly this class is aimed at attracting also...or was at one time long ago) can't find one of those anywhere..

Don't get me wrong, I understand all the sides of the story.. But we as 'seasoned vets' need to consider the 'new guy' and what they would do...

More likely to get the $260ish TC-01.. or something similar

$0.02
Raman likes this.
OSherman is offline  
Old 03-10-2021, 11:01 AM
  #10320  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
mrreet2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 2,043
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by OSherman
The 'new guy' (whom supposedly this class is aimed at attracting also) can't find one of those anywhere..
"This is meant to be something between VTA and sedan, but not the same as either one."
New guys should be starting in VTA

Regardless. It's a minimum weight not a maximum. Like i said before. If they want to run a heavy car no one is stopping them. There are plenty of cheap "modern" cars both new and used out there. USGT doesn't need to accommodate all poor chassis choices.
mrreet2001 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.