Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree6280Likes

USGT

    Hide Wikipost
Old 08-12-2017, 12:28 PM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: USGT
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: DARKSIDE
USIC USGT 2016 Motor and Chassis list in qualifing order

TQ A.F. TSR A800
2nd D.J. TeamPowers A800
3rd B.S. TSR A800
4th M.L. TSR A800
5th M.F TeamPowers A800
6th D.J TSR Destiny
7th J.W. Trinity Monster '17 Xray
8th C.V TSR Destiny
9 A.C. TSR A700
10 B.K. R1 v15 A700
11
12
13 J.L. TSR A800
14 M.L. TSR Destiny
15
16 J.M. TSR. 15 Xray
17
18 R.C. TSR T4
19 M.K. Reedy Powered M3 AE TC7
20 S.J. TSR Destiny
21
22 E.S. motiv T4
23
24
25
26 P.D. TSR Destiny
27
28
29
30 V.P. Reedy M3 serpent 3.0
31
32
33
34
35 Y.B. Fantom A800
36
37
38 R.C. TSR A800
39
40 W.S. Reedy
41
42
43 Motiv xray
44
45
46 Motiv Xray
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2013, 12:57 PM
  #1861  
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
JCarr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dayton,OH
Posts: 1,643
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

The Corvette DP was deemed legal with the reasoning being it is similar in shap and design to cars such as the Mclaren and Zonda. With that in mind I'm sure these new prototype bodies will be legal as well. Personally, I don't think they should be legal, but I don't make the rules. I will be happy running the bodies that I feel should make the class.
JCarr is offline  
Old 11-20-2013, 03:19 PM
  #1862  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (19)
 
alloyslash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 538
Trader Rating: 19 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by JCarr
The Corvette DP was deemed legal with the reasoning being it is similar in shap and design to cars such as the Mclaren and Zonda. With that in mind I'm sure these new prototype bodies will be legal as well. Personally, I don't think they should be legal, but I don't make the rules. I will be happy running the bodies that I feel should make the class.
I agree. While I like the way the corvette looks, I like the production car bodies offered for the class.
alloyslash is offline  
Old 11-21-2013, 05:11 AM
  #1863  
Tech Champion
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
robk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 8,201
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

As I have said before its not much different than some of the japanese gt cars that tamiya does or the hpi bodies previously mentioned.

Performance wise its not a huge deal either as we all got our brains beat in at our last big series race Sunday by a Tamiya BMW 2009 M3 on a Corally car. NSX Mclaren Mr2 Camaro and Lotus were all in the main if I remember right...
robk is offline  
Old 11-21-2013, 06:19 AM
  #1864  
Tech Master
iTrader: (49)
 
Rodarbal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 1,084
Trader Rating: 49 (100%+)
Default

Not convincing enough in my book, but like others said, I don't make the rules. IMO, it's not about what's competitive or not or whose body is "wedgier" than the other. Having prototype cars in a street-car-based GT class takes away from the scale aspect of USGT. As I've mentioned in a previous post, it's not USDP/P2/PC.

I think I'm going to paint up a '67 HPI Corvette to run in VTA....
Rodarbal is offline  
Old 11-21-2013, 06:31 AM
  #1865  
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
JCarr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dayton,OH
Posts: 1,643
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

I understand your decision Rob and it makes sense. With me, it's just the principal of the fact that it's a GT class and prototype bodies are legal. Not a huge deal and I will continue to run this class as it's a bunch of fun.
JCarr is offline  
Old 11-21-2013, 06:35 AM
  #1866  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (21)
 
Tommy R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 641
Trader Rating: 21 (100%+)
Default

I agree with RJ and JCarr. I really like this class and will continue to run GT bodies, regardless what's considered legal.
Tommy R is offline  
Old 11-21-2013, 07:06 AM
  #1867  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
jlfx car audio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: jackson,tn
Posts: 3,834
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

I could care less . I like the fact that any realistic body is considered legal (excluding roar tc bodies)
I think its cool to see different bodies on the track . but I only race carpet so aero dynamics has little effect (to me ) I just like the look of the corvette /McLaren/ Mazda proto bodies . my question is weight of the bodies I see more Proformance gains with LW bodies ...so who makes a light weight Usgt legal body :-p?
jlfx car audio is offline  
Old 11-21-2013, 09:22 AM
  #1868  
Tech Elite
 
IndyHobbies.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brownsburg, Indiana
Posts: 2,010
Default

Originally Posted by jlfx car audio
I like the fact that any realistic body is considered legal (excluding roar tc bodies)
I think its cool to see different bodies on the track...I just like the look of the corvette /McLaren/ Mazda proto bodies.
+2 (my son runs USGT as well) What I don't like, and I think many would agree, is the guys that just buy a legal body, spray it one color, skip any decals and simply run a clam shell. No effort towards realism. That misses the point of having a scale class. Then its just hardware. The concern about true GT vs. Prototype is shades of gray to me. Of course, the same thing happens in VTA too.
IndyHobbies.com is offline  
Old 11-21-2013, 09:42 AM
  #1869  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
jlfx car audio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: jackson,tn
Posts: 3,834
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

I do agree . one color bodies and little to no decals is not what I like to see ...at big races ,anyways . I mean I know it takes a lot of time and money to get have a nice paint job but it is worth it in terms of eye candy to the outsiders looking in.
jlfx car audio is offline  
Old 11-21-2013, 10:02 AM
  #1870  
Tech Master
iTrader: (46)
 
Travis S's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Moline, IL
Posts: 1,374
Trader Rating: 46 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by IndyHobbies.com
+2 (my son runs USGT as well) What I don't like, and I think many would agree, is the guys that just buy a legal body, spray it one color, skip any decals and simply run a clam shell. No effort towards realism. That misses the point of having a scale class. Then its just hardware. The concern about true GT vs. Prototype is shades of gray to me. Of course, the same thing happens in VTA too.
I suck at painting and do not enjoy painting... Simple as that. I am sure "real" VTA and GT cars were raced at some point with 1 color... I run USGT and USVTA mostly because 17.5 is 2 freaking fast on small tracks and 17.5 bodies all looks the same. I don't care about 1 color paint. I do think people should at least put the headlight and break stickers on...
Travis S is offline  
Old 11-21-2013, 11:22 AM
  #1871  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: columbus oh
Posts: 898
Default

wow paint!?!?
starrx is offline  
Old 11-21-2013, 02:01 PM
  #1872  
Tech Master
iTrader: (49)
 
Rodarbal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 1,084
Trader Rating: 49 (100%+)
Default

It's all good. Actually, the more I think about it, it IS ok to allow the DP bodies to run with the GT cars. Why? Because in USCR (formerly Grand AM/ALMS) the prototypes DO run with the GT cars!

To make it even more scale, maybe the prototypes should run 17.5T motors?




**ducking for cover!***
Rodarbal is offline  
Old 11-21-2013, 02:16 PM
  #1873  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
howardcano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 3,784
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Rodarbal
It's all good. Actually, the more I think about it, it IS ok to allow the DP bodies to run with the GT cars. Why? Because in USCR (formerly Grand AM/ALMS) the prototypes DO run with the GT cars!

To make it even more scale, maybe the prototypes should run 17.5T motors?

**ducking for cover!***
Yes. Also, the prototypes should run foam tires to simulate the higher grip levels of the real cars!

Now we both need to duck for cover.
howardcano is offline  
Old 11-21-2013, 02:50 PM
  #1874  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (30)
 
NutDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,038
Trader Rating: 30 (100%+)
Default

and prototypes should be allowed to run "boosted"!
NutDriver is offline  
Old 11-21-2013, 02:50 PM
  #1875  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
jlfx car audio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: jackson,tn
Posts: 3,834
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

I'm game !
jlfx car audio is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.