3 interesting prototypes from RC Magazine
#1
3 interesting prototypes from RC Magazine
Here are some pictures of 3 prototypes in the april issue of RCM (Japan) I bought during a trip to Taipei, just wanted to share them
I don't know how this one would handle...Seems to be a normal SD with some RS parts, a R3 steering rack and a custom made motor/spur gear mount (made out 2 RS motor mounts)
SD
I've saw this one on a personal webpage before, just a SV10 with an Assasin direct transmission.
SV10 Berkut
This one is pretty interesting...looks like the description of the "Spied Losi"
???
Would be glad to hear a translation from those articles
If some one is interested I can make some other scan with more details (especially of the SD based prototype).
I don't know how this one would handle...Seems to be a normal SD with some RS parts, a R3 steering rack and a custom made motor/spur gear mount (made out 2 RS motor mounts)
SD
I've saw this one on a personal webpage before, just a SV10 with an Assasin direct transmission.
SV10 Berkut
This one is pretty interesting...looks like the description of the "Spied Losi"
???
Would be glad to hear a translation from those articles
If some one is interested I can make some other scan with more details (especially of the SD based prototype).
#3
I like the Proto1, not because I like shaft cars (I dont), but because someone finally make a different shaft car.
That Proto3 also looks interesting, but the CG seems to be high, because the the belt goes UNDER the motor and batts. But again, I like when somebody have the courage to be different
That Proto3 also looks interesting, but the CG seems to be high, because the the belt goes UNDER the motor and batts. But again, I like when somebody have the courage to be different
#5
Originally posted by utieh
I don't see why the first one wouldn't work.
A classical shaft car is not so well balanced too, but in the same time I imagine this layout had been experimented by all manufacturers.
I don't see why the first one wouldn't work.
A classical shaft car is not so well balanced too, but in the same time I imagine this layout had been experimented by all manufacturers.
#6
Yeah, you'd imagine that the front motor/rear battery concept was tested by all manufacturers, but then again, you never know. I really like the idea. Good left/right balance with a saddle pack and a bit more rear weight bias.
#9
Tech Champion
iTrader: (9)
On Proto1.. Looks like this would work and well balanced for a shaft car... also
I want to know where I can get some of those personnel transponder holder... that's the best one I've seen so far..aside from making my own..
Proto 3.... Pro3 concept... another flexy flier..
I want to know where I can get some of those personnel transponder holder... that's the best one I've seen so far..aside from making my own..
Proto 3.... Pro3 concept... another flexy flier..
#10
on proto 1 which you say looks like a normal sd (which is does not!) it looks like you would have to have mega small electronics
#11
Interesting photos guys The proto 1 shaft drive car was actually ran in the Japan stock nationals last year I believe. The guy didn't make the "A" but he got a lot of press on his car
Steve Wang
Steve Wang
#12
The Proto1 might look well balanced, but then again, what about the centrifugal forces? That might be the reason for everybody else to go with the "classic" shaft design...
The Proto3 aint the flexy-flyer revisited, it's more like the KX-One. Stiff, but with a higher CG than usual most other cars...
The Proto3 aint the flexy-flyer revisited, it's more like the KX-One. Stiff, but with a higher CG than usual most other cars...
#13
Gotta love those home-made specials tha Japanese racers love to do... in the offroad forum there are a bunch of customised tourer-based 4wd buggies - and I've seen a few mad thngs done, like a uprated Grasshopper and a 4wds Tamiya Mini...
Anyway, I don't think proto 1 offers any weight distribution advantages - saddle and offset motor is just as bad as inline pack and offset motor.
Now, 4-cells on one side, and 2-cells and a motor on the other has potential...
Anyway, I don't think proto 1 offers any weight distribution advantages - saddle and offset motor is just as bad as inline pack and offset motor.
Now, 4-cells on one side, and 2-cells and a motor on the other has potential...
#14
Originally posted by pheyhoe
on proto 1 which you say looks like a normal sd (which is does not!) it looks like you would have to have mega small electronics
on proto 1 which you say looks like a normal sd (which is does not!) it looks like you would have to have mega small electronics
on the other page you can see ano†her prototype like this one using different arms, I will try to scan it tomorrow.
#15
Tech Initiate
Hello to everyone,
Unfortunately the link to the tourer photos didn't work for me.Could somebody try to reattach the images.What about the 4WD buggy prototypes in the off-road forum?Is there a link to them?
Thanks
Unfortunately the link to the tourer photos didn't work for me.Could somebody try to reattach the images.What about the 4WD buggy prototypes in the off-road forum?Is there a link to them?
Thanks