To ROAR Fixed Timing On Stock Brushless Motors
#76
Tech Regular
iTrader: (28)
Let me answer your question as to why people don't move up to mod in Region 1, or most indoor tracks around America. First of all, size of indoor tracks don't lend themselves to mod. Are you really going to competitively run sedans and 12th scale cars in mod with a 75 foot straightaway ( or less) and 6 foot lanes with todays technology? Its like driving a Ferrari in a gymnasium.
If your outdoors on a 150 foot plus track with wide open lanes, then running 13.5 or 17.5 is quite retarded.
Bottom line, if your local club cant support mod, its pretty unreasonable to expect this big leap to mod unless mod itself, perhaps all cars in general, are slowed down.
#77
I know you too ....
4 cheeseburgers & a extra large fry ...
Why does a Sedan racer who is experience and has mass skills think they have to use a 3.5 to race mod when a slower motor just may be best for them and the track ?
Mod is any motor you choose , so if your faster with a 17.5 ?
Power to yeah ...
#78
Where does today's 13.5 compare to modified in the past? I would not be surprised if those that thought mod was too fast 3-4 years ago are racing those same speeds today but with 13.5 motors.
#79
I just want to know what would be the big problem with having a cheaper fixed timed bushing motor?
I don't care about esc this is not the issue, but a cheaper more cost effective motor. I would be more cheaper for the manufactures to produce this type of motor, bearings cost more money if you fix the endbell where is the increase in cost? Everyone is talking about the economy but we are paying 50.00 more for a motor now if not more.
Tell me why in this ecomony you want to spend more money and why would a motor that would cost less be bad for racing?
I don't care about esc this is not the issue, but a cheaper more cost effective motor. I would be more cheaper for the manufactures to produce this type of motor, bearings cost more money if you fix the endbell where is the increase in cost? Everyone is talking about the economy but we are paying 50.00 more for a motor now if not more.
Tell me why in this ecomony you want to spend more money and why would a motor that would cost less be bad for racing?
#80
The only way this will work is if the track director tells everybody. For stock class, you must run this esc, and this motor, or go back to brushed motors for stock racing.
It would be a waste of time for manufactures to produce a new system for stock class.
When it comes down to racing, no matter what you do, the fast guys will be fast, the slow guys will be slow.
It would be a waste of time for manufactures to produce a new system for stock class.
When it comes down to racing, no matter what you do, the fast guys will be fast, the slow guys will be slow.
#81
Tech Champion
iTrader: (38)
I just want to know what would be the big problem with having a cheaper fixed timed bushing motor?
I don't care about esc this is not the issue, but a cheaper more cost effective motor. I would be more cheaper for the manufactures to produce this type of motor, bearings cost more money if you fix the endbell where is the increase in cost? Everyone is talking about the economy but we are paying 50.00 more for a motor now if not more.
Tell me why in this ecomony you want to spend more money and why would a motor that would cost less be bad for racing?
I don't care about esc this is not the issue, but a cheaper more cost effective motor. I would be more cheaper for the manufactures to produce this type of motor, bearings cost more money if you fix the endbell where is the increase in cost? Everyone is talking about the economy but we are paying 50.00 more for a motor now if not more.
Tell me why in this ecomony you want to spend more money and why would a motor that would cost less be bad for racing?
What is the problem you are really trying to solve? The cost of the hobby? The speed of it?
#82
Tech Master
iTrader: (8)
I just want to know what would be the big problem with having a cheaper fixed timed bushing motor?
I don't care about esc this is not the issue, but a cheaper more cost effective motor. I would be more cheaper for the manufactures to produce this type of motor, bearings cost more money if you fix the endbell where is the increase in cost? Everyone is talking about the economy but we are paying 50.00 more for a motor now if not more.
Tell me why in this ecomony you want to spend more money and why would a motor that would cost less be bad for racing?
I don't care about esc this is not the issue, but a cheaper more cost effective motor. I would be more cheaper for the manufactures to produce this type of motor, bearings cost more money if you fix the endbell where is the increase in cost? Everyone is talking about the economy but we are paying 50.00 more for a motor now if not more.
Tell me why in this ecomony you want to spend more money and why would a motor that would cost less be bad for racing?
Is it the sensor that adds cost? I don't know if senorless would be cheaper?
#83
How about a fixed rotor?
That'll slow 'em down.
That'll slow 'em down.
#89
Tech Champion
iTrader: (38)
This thread is ridiculous. We are proposing fixed timing (presumably to 0) which is what most people run anyway. So everyone in the hobby buys new motors to have exactly what we have now. All this and the thread creator can't explain what problem they are trying to solve??
ROAR, don't change a thing.
ROAR, don't change a thing.
#90
Tech Master
iTrader: (8)
Team Checkpoint 17.5, $79.99...
http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...&I=LXWTV9&P=ML
(I was thinking about trying one of these...)