Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Pro 10: 235mm Le Mans Prototype Pan Car Discussion >

Pro 10: 235mm Le Mans Prototype Pan Car Discussion

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree1568Likes

Pro 10: 235mm Le Mans Prototype Pan Car Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2016, 01:24 PM
  #3751  
Tech Addict
 
pphaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 509
Default

Originally Posted by TOADYY
Short stack
Any more details on why?

My understanding is that there's a little less wire in a short stack, so it's basically like a "13.25T", with a bit more power, right? In what situation would it possibly be better to run the normal one?!?
pphaneuf is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 01:32 PM
  #3752  
Tech Champion
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
liljohn1064's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Deerfield, WI
Posts: 5,919
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by xps800doo
how many current companies are making 235mm kits? thinking about putting one on the track this year for champs... i can only find maybe a handful at best...
There are at least 6 SpeedMerchant Roadkill 10s in Madison.
liljohn1064 is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 02:05 PM
  #3753  
Tech Master
iTrader: (6)
 
TOADYY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,602
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by pphaneuf
Any more details on why?

My understanding is that there's a little less wire in a short stack, so it's basically like a "13.25T", with a bit more power, right? In what situation would it possibly be better to run the normal one?!?
Not exactly. The stator is a little shorter which will result in little less torque with higher RPM. Which is what we want for our lightweight pan cars. The wire wrap will still be 13.5T.

Watch video this he shows you the measurement between a short and regular stack motor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9LwWAEBX2g
TOADYY is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 02:52 PM
  #3754  
Tech Addict
 
pphaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 509
Default

Originally Posted by TOADYY
Not exactly. The stator is a little shorter which will result in little less torque with higher RPM. Which is what we want for our lightweight pan cars. The wire wrap will still be 13.5T.
Yes, what I mean is that since the stator is a bit shorter, it takes a bit less wire to do 13 and a half turns around it.

A bit less torque and more RPM is what I expected, wondering if there's an effect on overall power, or if it's just a different trade-off? I'm guessing there's an effect, because we can just change the rollout to trade RPM for torque already...
pphaneuf is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 02:59 PM
  #3755  
Tech Champion
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
liljohn1064's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Deerfield, WI
Posts: 5,919
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by pphaneuf
Yes, what I mean is that since the stator is a bit shorter, it takes a bit less wire to do 13 and a half turns around it.

A bit less torque and more RPM is what I expected, wondering if there's an effect on overall power, or if it's just a different trade-off? I'm guessing there's an effect, because we can just change the rollout to trade RPM for torque already...
Trade off. It also increases the current the motor pulls.

You were right at the point of saying it: Less turns or shorter stator stack (less wire) is more rpm at a higher current draw. Loss of torque is marginal as brushless has too much anyway. But, it will make the motor feel softer on takeoff. Both work, you just have to move the gearing around to hit the right power band and feel for the track. Most people are too lazy for this and want the magic bullet: Perfect motor, perfect timing, perfect gear ratio and no effort.
liljohn1064 is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 03:46 PM
  #3756  
Tech Addict
 
pphaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 509
Default

Originally Posted by liljohn1064
Trade off. It also increases the current the motor pulls.

You were right at the point of saying it: Less turns or shorter stator stack (less wire) is more rpm at a higher current draw. Loss of torque is marginal as brushless has too much anyway. But, it will make the motor feel softer on takeoff. Both work, you just have to move the gearing around to hit the right power band and feel for the track.
Ah, but higher current at equal voltage is more watts: more power!

That's also how a low turn motor is more powerful: it has less absolute torque, but more overall power, you just have to gear down. A 4.5T motor has to be geared at 8.0 (in a touring car), and a 21.5T is able to pull 3.0, but there's no question that it has less overall power, it's not just a trade-off.
pphaneuf is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 03:54 PM
  #3757  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
howardcano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 3,784
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by pphaneuf
That's also how a low turn motor is more powerful: it has less absolute torque, but more overall power, you just have to gear down.
Not quite. Fewer turns = MORE torque and more RPM, everything else being equal. That's because the stator resistance varies as the square of the turn count; the current therefore varies as the inverse square of the turn count.

Example: If the number of turns is decreased by a factor of two, the resistance will decrease by a factor of four. First, the wire length is halved, cutting the resistance in half. Then the wire cross-sectional area is doubled to fill up the otherwise empty space on the stator. That's half the resistance again, for a factor of four. So the current also increases by a factor of four. Since torque is proportional to ampere*turns, four times the current times half the turns = twice the torque.

Last edited by howardcano; 09-01-2016 at 04:14 PM. Reason: Included example.
howardcano is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 04:25 PM
  #3758  
Tech Addict
 
pphaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 509
Default

Originally Posted by howardcano
Not quite. Fewer turns = MORE torque and more RPM, everything else being equal. That's because the stator resistance varies as the square of the turn count; the current therefore varies as the inverse square of the turn count.
Hmm, that's true, higher RPM even implies a higher stall torque, right?

I'm guessing short stack motors have to have the same gauge of wire (they're used in spec racing, they've got to be maxed out already?), so only a bit less resistance, which means more power, but does the shorter stator reduce the field strength?

In short, if short stacks are so good, they'd just make the short stack version, and not bother with the regular one, so seems like there must be a compromise... Since we can readily trade torque for speed with gearing, it feels like I'm missing something...
pphaneuf is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 04:38 PM
  #3759  
Tech Addict
 
pphaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 509
Default

Oh, there's one thing: they must be lighter. With a pan car, that has the motor in the pod, that's good (less unsprung mass).

Even at equal power, that'd be better. Don't see what's "1S" about it, though...
pphaneuf is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 04:44 PM
  #3760  
Tech Master
iTrader: (6)
 
TOADYY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,602
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by pphaneuf
Oh, there's one thing: they must be lighter. With a pan car, that has the motor in the pod, that's good (less unsprung mass).

Even at equal power, that'd be better. Don't see what's "1S" about it, though...
That's correct, short stacks are lighter. If you watch that video link I posted, Nick does a comparison between the Fantom short stack with a regular stack.
He compares, specs, weight, stack measurement, amp draw, RPM and etc.
TOADYY is offline  
Old 09-02-2016, 02:58 PM
  #3761  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 103
Default

Roadkill10 ready for testing tomorrow.
Attached Thumbnails Pro 10: 235mm Le Mans Prototype Pan Car Discussion-roadkill_conversion1.jpg  
team_tamale is offline  
Old 09-05-2016, 01:45 PM
  #3762  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: My house.
Posts: 3,569
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Heads up!
Lexan sheets will arrive this week according to seller, hope a couple will come out usable

Learnt so much, still improvements will always be made to the shape of the bodyshell according to feedback. Got a few tricks up the sleeve too.
30Tooth is offline  
Old 09-13-2016, 08:19 PM
  #3763  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (218)
 
racerx1920's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,008
Trader Rating: 218 (100%+)
Default

what size tires is everyone running?
racerx1920 is offline  
Old 09-13-2016, 08:22 PM
  #3764  
Tech Master
iTrader: (6)
 
TOADYY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,602
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by racerx1920
what size tires is everyone running?
Asphalt: full size/60mm
Carpet: 53mm
TOADYY is offline  
Old 09-14-2016, 02:06 AM
  #3765  
Tech Addict
 
pphaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 509
Default

Originally Posted by racerx1920
what size tires is everyone running?
I run up to 55mm indoors for club racing, but yeah, at bigger races, 53mm.
pphaneuf is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.