Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Any interest in a MI3/3.5 Lipo Chassis? >

Any interest in a MI3/3.5 Lipo Chassis?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Any interest in a MI3/3.5 Lipo Chassis?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2009, 12:25 PM
  #16  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (14)
 
skypilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,671
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

so anyway, yea, I'm interested, pm me ordering info for the Mi3 chassis
skypilot is offline  
Old 07-09-2009, 12:29 PM
  #17  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (32)
 
Kevin K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: In a land of mini-mighty mental giants
Posts: 8,854
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Whats the price for the MI3 chassis kit?
Kevin K is offline  
Old 07-09-2009, 01:52 PM
  #18  
Tech Champion
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
MikeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 5,746
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff Werner
The schumacher is a killer looking addition. The Tc5 and the Mi3.5 both look really updated when you add these parts. How has testing with the Schumacher gone?

Jeff
Thanks! I call the TC5 chassis the 2010 Spec I think with the popularity of lipos for club racing, the manufacturers will follow suit with similar concepts to mine in the following years, if they continue to design cars with the battery to one side.
My Schumacher is totally transformed. I was not a big fan of the original MI3's performance for Socal temporary asphalt tracks- just WAY too stiff and also a small window of optimal handling on permanent asphalt tracks.
With the new chassis the handling is just incredible now on these tracks. More rear grip equaled being able dial in more aggressive steering... I won't go on about it but once word gets out after people try it watch out

Originally Posted by Besercoe
I think the 009 would benefit a lot with the additional flex in the rear end of the chassis, i have tried the fibreglass T2R chassis plate, but i think it just flexes too much from the motor forward. The slots in the rear end of the chassis would help remove the Xray tendancy to lose its ass on low grip tracks.
Very good to know about the 009. That was the common trait with my TC5 and MI3 on very low grip club tracks until the changes for more chassis flex in the rear.

Originally Posted by Hebiki
no love for the TB-03?
Um no. Ha j/k Chris! If there is demand I have the capability.

Originally Posted by skypilot
so anyway, yea, I'm interested, pm me ordering info for the Mi3 chassis
Will do!

Originally Posted by Kevin K
Whats the price for the MI3 chassis kit?
$79.95 for the lipo chassis. Probably about $15 for the top flex plate.

I'll get these into production this month. Hopefully I can at least sell enough MI3 lipo kits to break even on the development cost


Thanks all for the support!
MikeR is offline  
Old 07-09-2009, 05:19 PM
  #19  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 762
Trader Rating: 20 (100%+)
Default

Hi

I just got a mi-3.5 pro . how would this chassis benifit me over the stock one ?. Thank's
hippie is offline  
Old 07-09-2009, 07:49 PM
  #20  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (14)
 
skypilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,671
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by hippie
Hi

I just got a mi-3.5 pro . how would this chassis benifit me over the stock one ?. Thank's
asked and answered

Originally Posted by MikeR
My Schumacher is totally transformed. I was not a big fan of the original MI3's performance for Socal temporary asphalt tracks- just WAY too stiff and also a small window of optimal handling on permanent asphalt tracks.
With the new chassis the handling is just incredible now on these tracks. More rear grip equaled being able dial in more aggressive steering... I won't go on about it but once word gets out after people try it watch out



Thanks all for the support!
skypilot is offline  
Old 07-09-2009, 08:10 PM
  #21  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 762
Trader Rating: 20 (100%+)
Default

MY 3.5 will only be race on carpet with rubber tires . Does this chassis have the same benifit on carpet as it does on asphalt ?.
hippie is offline  
Old 07-09-2009, 08:51 PM
  #22  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (14)
 
skypilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,671
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

carpet is higher bite then asphalt, you may want to check into the 3mm carpet chassis and carpet top deck.
skypilot is offline  
Old 07-09-2009, 09:54 PM
  #23  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (10)
 
J.Dy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 165
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Since this thread has talked about other cars.... I would like to see an ABC genetic chassis. Thicker with 5000mAh lipo brace . And I 2nd the TB03 chassis.
J.Dy is offline  
Old 07-10-2009, 08:16 AM
  #24  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (10)
 
Jochim_18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CENCAL
Posts: 2,474
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Both of my Mi3 needs new chassis so I will defenitely getting one of this instead of the stock chassis.
Jochim_18 is offline  
Old 07-10-2009, 11:44 AM
  #25  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (10)
 
Jochim_18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CENCAL
Posts: 2,474
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Pm sent
Jochim_18 is offline  
Old 07-10-2009, 11:56 AM
  #26  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (26)
 
Hebiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 12,922
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by MikeR
Um no. Ha j/k Chris! If there is demand I have the capability.
I WANT ONE NOW! (how's that for demand? )

well me and J.Dy want one..
Hebiki is offline  
Old 07-13-2009, 12:45 PM
  #27  
Tech Champion
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
MikeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 5,746
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by hippie
MY 3.5 will only be race on carpet with rubber tires . Does this chassis have the same benifit on carpet as it does on asphalt ?.
Typically, when running rubber tires on carpet you would still use stock thickness bottom plates so yes. Foam tires is when a thicker chassis might benefit you as grip levels can go through the roof. As traction goes up with rubber on carpet you can tune the MI3 with heavier springs and stiffer top plate options that Schumacher has if needed.
MikeR is offline  
Old 07-18-2009, 08:51 PM
  #28  
Tech Master
iTrader: (5)
 
RKeasler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: A step closer to where I need to be a step further from where I was
Posts: 1,186
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Love that chassis saw the TC5 first and made me want a TC5 (and I don't like the TC5). Definitely have to have one of these.

Rod
RKeasler is offline  
Old 07-18-2009, 09:01 PM
  #29  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
JimmyMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NC
Posts: 4,447
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

I agree with you Rod! I saw that TC5 chassis and it made me want one too! I would have one for sure if I did though. But I'm racing a Yokomo BD5. Eventually they will sell the lipo chassis for it. BUT, it will be wider, which sucks arse. So I probably won't switch over.
JimmyMac is offline  
Old 07-19-2009, 05:09 PM
  #30  
Tech Master
iTrader: (5)
 
RKeasler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: A step closer to where I need to be a step further from where I was
Posts: 1,186
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Let me know the process to get one of these, maybe two!!!!

Rod
RKeasler is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.