Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Are TC5s crap?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2008, 09:48 PM
  #31  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
 
James khoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 2,826
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

I had Tc5 and Schumacher Mi3,with the first time outing for Tc5 at local race(Rubber),I TQ(By 9 sec)and won the race.I like the car handling,but lot of parts are made in China,so,the quality is not up to par compare to Tc3 i used to have.
James khoo is offline  
Old 03-02-2008, 11:49 PM
  #32  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
HappyHippo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 632
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

THe TC5 is a good car, the reason that I sell my TC5 is that parts here where i live(Norway) are so expensive before the last race I had to order some parts from the scandinavien distubuter and was expensice 45$ for a spool, 17$ for blades, AE has lost much on the european market after Thunder Tiger has take ower here, that's to bad


BTW there are a thing or 2 that AE could have done diffrent on the TC5, the armmounts on the bulkheads (done them like xray) and lowerd the topdeck
HappyHippo is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 12:39 AM
  #33  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 121
Default

great car, only complian the motor CG position outer than other new car is one of it weaknesses.
G2B Anthony is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 02:24 AM
  #34  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Hague, Holland
Posts: 205
Default

Originally Posted by G2B Anthony
great car, only complian the motor CG position outer than other new car is one of it weaknesses.
But due to the motor not touching the bulkheads or topdeck, but only the motormount itself. The car will tweak less when going on throttle racing modified, most other cars have this problem, losing stability going out of a corner. TC5 keeps this stability, so they designed it this way for a reason.
Rick Thomson is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 03:46 AM
  #35  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
miller tyme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,005
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

It is really unfair to say so an so car did so and so at big race x. Most factory or heavily sponsored drivers could put a shoebox in the show with the support they get.
The TC-5 has a higher CG than X-ray, Corrally or Tamiya. The 3 or 4 I've seen and or helped work on had very poor finish quality. Out of the box set-ups were very close with x-ray and Corrally, not the TC-5. And it seemed the TC-5 was more prone to getting tweaked in some manner or the other.

I seriously doubt there are more TC-5 out there than X-ray or RDX, maybe more than Tamiya 415.
Bottom line is the TC-5 can be made to work...just plan on putting a lot more work into it than the complicated T/C already require.
Everyone I've kn own who had one and also tried one of the others...has switched back to the others.
miller tyme is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 03:50 AM
  #36  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
robk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 8,201
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

There is no car that everybody loves.

That being said, the top deck argument is silly. You pick up way more in torsional stiffness than any CG advantage gained. The amount of weight that is moved up is minimal. Besides, an FK04 ("high" cg) will still destroy 95% of the cars out there.
robk is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 04:13 AM
  #37  
Tech Champion
 
tc3team's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 6,151
Default

Maybe it is just me, but I have found the parts finish on the associated kits need a lot of fettling to make them fit right. I havnt regretted switching to Tamiya.
tc3team is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 05:01 AM
  #38  
Tech Master
iTrader: (23)
 
hobbipro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 1,375
Trader Rating: 23 (100%+)
Default

Associated's quality control has gone out the window. I have had TC3's and 4's in the past and while there was some hand fitting the cars were actually very good and durable. But lately I have just assembled a T4, and B4 for offroad and both kits had defective parts. One had a ball diff nut with messed up threads, and the other had visually defective front shocks (threads/finish) which I have no idea how anyone could throw thow them into a kit and expect them not to get cought. I've probably owned almost every AE product since the first rc10 in the 80's, and this has become a let down.
hobbipro is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 05:26 AM
  #39  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Gain Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Down on the corner out in the street
Posts: 249
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

I wonder why some Xray owners get so uptight when there is a discussion on the TC5?
Gain Time is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 08:01 AM
  #40  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NW Minnesota
Posts: 355
Trader Rating: 23 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Gain Time
I wonder why some Xray owners get so uptight when there is a discussion on the TC5?
After reading the posts on this thread, I don't recall any X-Ray owners bashing the TC5. This post is about why so many TC5's are for sale. If you want to get into the touring cars, the TC5 may be more affordable and still very competetive. After owning my TC3 for years I changed cars to an X-Ray and I like my new car.

Originally Posted by robk
There is no car that everybody loves.
As mentioned in an earlier post, each car will handle different and each driver will drive different. You just have to match your driving style with the car that fits you.
Rc guy is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 08:40 AM
  #41  
Tech Master
iTrader: (8)
 
PitNamedGordie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Highwood, IL
Posts: 1,789
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Bikerbob
There are SOO many for sale and they are so new? whats the deal?
No they aren't crap.

I assume there are so many because they are fairly popular and relatively inexpensive. Also a lot of us belong to "the car of the month club". People tend to change their equipment a lot.

The car is pretty lipo friendly, easy to setup, and handles well. The parts are durable, easy to find and inexpensive.

I like a lot of cars out there but this one works for me.
PitNamedGordie is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 08:47 AM
  #42  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (38)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 5,360
Trader Rating: 38 (100%+)
Default

TC5's aren't crap but they are "the sh!t!"
or8ital is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 04:58 PM
  #43  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Gain Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Down on the corner out in the street
Posts: 249
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Rc guy
After reading the posts on this thread, I don't recall any X-Ray owners bashing the TC5. This post is about why so many TC5's are for sale. If you want to get into the touring cars, the TC5 may be more affordable and still very competetive. After owning my TC3 for years I changed cars to an X-Ray and I like my new car.
You are correct....that dude drives a Corally. I believe it was other threads. I read so many of these useless threads they run together.
Gain Time is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.