Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Tekno ET48 Thread >

Tekno ET48 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree38Likes

Tekno ET48 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2013 | 10:11 PM
  #166  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 894
From: D/FW Texas
Default

My 5s 4200mah setup runs about two minutes longer than my 4s 5300mah setup. Same buggy just different motor kv and gearing ( they both top out at the same speed). And the 5s pack is lighter than the two crap 2s2p packs I was using, now my 4s setup is two 2950mah 4s packs in parallel (serpent e-buggy).

I gave up trying to explain that a long time ago though. Now when someone asks me what I run I just say 4s, and yes this is on a track in a race environment.
w_dupree is offline  
Old 06-17-2013 | 11:15 PM
  #167  
Rockthecatbox21's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,794
From: Texas panhandle
Default

Originally Posted by w_dupree
My 5s 4200mah setup runs about two minutes longer than my 4s 5300mah setup. Same buggy just different motor kv and gearing ( they both top out at the same speed). And the 5s pack is lighter than the two crap 2s2p packs I was using, now my 4s setup is two 2950mah 4s packs in parallel (serpent e-buggy).

I gave up trying to explain that a long time ago though. Now when someone asks me what I run I just say 4s, and yes this is on a track in a race environment.
This is exactly like what i was saying. No matter how you explain it, someone will always take it for something it isn't. People in rc are smarter than most, but this is one subject some just can't wrap their heads around. I'm all for 6s if you have a rule in place for it. Make a motor limit, say 1500Kv and less and it could definitely work.
Rockthecatbox21 is offline  
Old 06-17-2013 | 11:27 PM
  #168  
Tech Master
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,981
Default

Guess its kinda a good thing that ROAR will likely set the limit to 4S. Yes it sucks for us who want the 6S efficiency setups but it will make it easier as far as consistent rules go. I'm sure a lot wouldn't do eTruggy if they felt they had to to a 6S setup to be competitive rather than be fine using existing 4S packs from their buggies.
iTz Nicholas72 is offline  
Old 06-18-2013 | 03:03 AM
  #169  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 256
Default

Originally Posted by Rockthecatbox21
6s packs? 15 meter jumps? You obviously aren't racing. If you were a racer you would see why the tekno is a better choice. And if you are bashing, i'd say the durango is not what you'd want to look at for durability.
I can't race, there isn't a single track within 400km from where I live. What there is, however, is plenty of rock quarries, rocky plateaus, gravel football pitches and other similar bash-able surfaces.

The problem with Tekno is that racing is inherent to its design, and as such, despite build quality or durability, it's not a good choice for me. I suppose you could say that any 1:8 buggy or truggy is designed to be first and foremost a racer (except Vorza), but the simple truth is, some of those racing buggies and truggies are better suited for bashing than others.

DEX408T looks like one of those "better" bashing cars, though I'll probably wait until the Serpent e-truggy is announced before making another purchase.

I really don't require much of my bashing cars. They have to be durable and well-built, the requirement which almost all modern 1:8 buggies and truggies fit. I need to be able to use either dual 3S or a single 6S battery pack. A sturdy motor mount, preferably with 4 for Castle motors, goes a long way. And maximum possible CVA/shock protection - which means dust boots everywhere possible, mud guards on rear arms and, of course, Outerwears Shockwears on all 4 shocks.
ignis is offline  
Old 06-18-2013 | 04:27 AM
  #170  
Gene158's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 634
From: New Haven, CT
Default

I would be all over this truggy except e truggy is totally dead around here.
Gene158 is offline  
Old 06-18-2013 | 07:56 AM
  #171  
blade329's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (114)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,124
From: Glendora, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ignis
I can't race, there isn't a single track within 400km from where I live. What there is, however, is plenty of rock quarries, rocky plateaus, gravel football pitches and other similar bash-able surfaces.

The problem with Tekno is that racing is inherent to its design, and as such, despite build quality or durability, it's not a good choice for me. I suppose you could say that any 1:8 buggy or truggy is designed to be first and foremost a racer (except Vorza), but the simple truth is, some of those racing buggies and truggies are better suited for bashing than others.

DEX408T looks like one of those "better" bashing cars, though I'll probably wait until the Serpent e-truggy is announced before making another purchase.

I really don't require much of my bashing cars. They have to be durable and well-built, the requirement which almost all modern 1:8 buggies and truggies fit. I need to be able to use either dual 3S or a single 6S battery pack. A sturdy motor mount, preferably with 4 for Castle motors, goes a long way. And maximum possible CVA/shock protection - which means dust boots everywhere possible, mud guards on rear arms and, of course, Outerwears Shockwears on all 4 shocks.
If bashing is your thing, I would just get a used 8ight-T 2.0 and convert it using a Tekno V4 chassis. Very durable Truggy.
blade329 is offline  
Old 06-18-2013 | 09:09 AM
  #172  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 256
Default

Originally Posted by blade329
If bashing is your thing, I would just get a used 8ight-T 2.0 and convert it using a Tekno V4 chassis. Very durable Truggy.
I already have a RC8T V4. Still, I would prefer a truggy designed from the ground up as an electrical vehicle, as the conversion, as well as the RC8T itself have a number of problems inherent to their design.
ignis is offline  
Old 06-18-2013 | 09:27 AM
  #173  
Randy_Pike's Avatar
Team Tekin
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,912
From: Norcal
Default

I can't imagine bashing this truck! When I want to mob around and "bash" I pick up my Savage Flux and have it....
Randy_Pike is offline  
Old 06-18-2013 | 09:49 AM
  #174  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 256
Default

You simply cannot compare the build and design quality of RTR monster trucks and 1:8 buggy/truggy kits which cost about the same, but don't come with electronics.

For RTR kits manufacturers cut every corner possible to reduce costs. This results in poor build quality, often forcing you to dump hundreds of additional dollars into durability upgrades just to prevent your monster truck from breaking on every bad landing. I had to do just that with my LST2 and E-Revo.

1:8 buggy/truggy kits, on the other hand, are designed to endure the harsh and taxing environment of competitive racing. Those kits use considerably higher quality plastics and alloys, their diffs don't strip on 6S, they're much easier to maintain and work on, and offer much better tuning/customization options.

I think it's a psychological thing. People are easier goaded into spending $500 on a RTR car + another $500 worth of upgrades, than getting a $500 kit + $500 worth of electronics and radio equipment.
ignis is offline  
Old 06-18-2013 | 10:34 AM
  #175  
Rockthecatbox21's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,794
From: Texas panhandle
Default

Originally Posted by ignis
You simply cannot compare the build and design quality of RTR monster trucks and 1:8 buggy/truggy kits which cost about the same, but don't come with electronics.

For RTR kits manufacturers cut every corner possible to reduce costs. This results in poor build quality, often forcing you to dump hundreds of additional dollars into durability upgrades just to prevent your monster truck from breaking on every bad landing. I had to do just that with my LST2 and E-Revo.

1:8 buggy/truggy kits, on the other hand, are designed to endure the harsh and taxing environment of competitive racing. Those kits use considerably higher quality plastics and alloys, their diffs don't strip on 6S, they're much easier to maintain and work on, and offer much better tuning/customization options.

I think it's a psychological thing. People are easier goaded into spending $500 on a RTR car + another $500 worth of upgrades, than getting a $500 kit + $500 worth of electronics and radio equipment.
That's like taking a brand new ford f-150 raptor out to a muddy trail somewhere, when you could just be fine with an old beater lifted truck. My point is, you don't need the best of the best when bashing. If you're a true basher, you know that driving finesse and very good handling are not needed. Bashing a uber racer kit when you already have an e-truggy doesn't make sense. Also, race kits aren't always the most durable. In fact, it may be the exact opposite, the arms and plastics on race kits are better quality, but they are more brittle and resistant to flex. This would make them break more easily compared to an rpm equipped savage that flexes instead of breaking.
Rockthecatbox21 is offline  
Old 06-18-2013 | 11:54 AM
  #176  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 256
Default

That's why I always boil my car arms in salt water before installing them

Adds the necessary flex without sacrificing any durability.
ignis is offline  
Old 06-18-2013 | 12:52 PM
  #177  
blade329's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (114)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,124
From: Glendora, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ignis
......as well as the RC8T itself have a number of problems inherent to their design.
I had one of these and your totally RIGHT!!! That's why I switched to the 8ight.
blade329 is offline  
Old 06-18-2013 | 11:36 PM
  #178  
UK.hardcore's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,315
From: Belgium.
Default

The thing is all vehicles have problems, converted or purpose build.

You just have to know how to work with that.

And the Tekno as light as it is may not be the strongest truggy on the market.

Honestly i wouldn't invest €1500 in a truggy to beat the snot out of it.
UK.hardcore is offline  
Old 06-19-2013 | 12:54 AM
  #179  
justpoet's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,063
From: NH, USA
Talking

Originally Posted by UK.hardcore
Honestly i wouldn't invest €1500 in a truggy to beat the snot out of it.
Nor would I, but lots of people spend that on upgrades for a Slash...so bashing isn't really about the most sensibly budget minded way to jump over a house, just to do it with something they like.

The Tekno, while not designed for it, should be quite a reasonable basher...the SCT410 for example is more durable than just about any other SC with just a couple upgrades (AL hinge pin holders).

If bashers want to run and support third party products for a vehicle I want to race, I'm all for it.
justpoet is offline  
Old 06-19-2013 | 01:25 AM
  #180  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 256
Default

Quite right, breaking parts and upgrading the cars is just as big a part of the hobby as actually driving them I've probably already spent twice the Revo's price on upgrades, and I don't regret it one bit.
ignis is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.