Cain

iTrader: (294)

this looks familar, but don't recall who made this or what its called:



anyone?

joelwhite

iTrader: (62)

Its a schumacher cat, not 100% sure of the version though

Cain

iTrader: (294)

thanks, I was thinking schumacher but couldn't find anything when I tried google for pics lol

looking more it appears to be a CAT 98 with different towers than some pics I have seen.

asc6000

iTrader: (15)

I got excited seeing the thread title but unfortunately had no clue what that car was.
Enjoyed the vintage CRP motor tubes though thanks : )

joelwhite

iTrader: (62)

The chassis has the cat 2000 shape, but the og 2000 had more laid down shocks. hmmmm

Rufus2010

iTrader: (3)

I cannot help on identification, but I have a question. At first glance, it appears that the belt drive set up would be light and efficient compared to a shaft drive system. What were it's problems and/or why isn't it used more today?

Stealth_RT

iTrader: (5)

Isn't the newest Schumacher cat K1 still belt drive? Pretty much all onroad touring cars are belt drive, but they, obviously, don't have to deal with on-power landings from jumps. Mostly though, I think most cars have gone shaft drive for durability and less maintenance. Same reason most 4wd buggies have gone gear diffs. Better able to keep dirt out and deal with the high torque of brushless motors.

Badger5

It looks more like a Schumacher Cat 98 with alternative (possibly Fibrelyte) shock towers.