Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
TLR TEN-SCTE 2.0 Kit Thread >

TLR TEN-SCTE 2.0 Kit Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree10Likes

TLR TEN-SCTE 2.0 Kit Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-2013, 10:22 AM
  #4036  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 102
Default

Originally Posted by LVBaja
The rest of the electric mains were 10 minutes, but they shortened the 4x4SC main to 7 minutes because guys were worried they couldn't last 10.
I thought it was 10 min (my bad) I saw it on the board 10 min did'nt realize they changed it. 2wheel sc main was 10 min.
tekinACE is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 10:28 AM
  #4037  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (114)
 
blade329's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Glendora, CA
Posts: 5,124
Trader Rating: 114 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Casper
With an emulsion shock you have to let the shock suck some air. You are creating a vaccum in the shock when you push the shaft all the way up to displace the oil and then seal it off. Stroke the shock back and forth a few times and it should normalize. A little suck back is not bad as well as a touch of rebound. It is the shock trying to normalize itself.
Thanks Casper. I will try that tonight.
blade329 is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 11:17 AM
  #4038  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (33)
 
rcgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Blackfoot Idaho.
Posts: 3,464
Trader Rating: 33 (100%+)
Default

Just called nitrohouse and they discontinued the 1.0 bump chassis and are working on a 2.0 chassis with different braces and a receiver box.
rcgod is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 11:53 AM
  #4039  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (114)
 
blade329's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Glendora, CA
Posts: 5,124
Trader Rating: 114 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by rcgod
Just called nitrohouse and they discontinued the 1.0 bump chassis and are working on a 2.0 chassis with different braces and a receiver box.
I'll be looking at that with great interest.
blade329 is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 04:23 PM
  #4040  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Langley, B.C.
Posts: 940
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Can someone explain to me how you can run the 22 pistons with 2 holes and thicker fluid over the stock pistons with thinner fluid will work? Wouldn't this create a lot more pack?
SuperDaveNT is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 02:19 AM
  #4041  
Tech Master
iTrader: (58)
 
OfnaJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Bristol Va
Posts: 1,575
Trader Rating: 58 (100%+)
Default

Will the battery strap from the 2.0 fit the 1.0 ?
OfnaJoe is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 02:30 AM
  #4042  
Tech Addict
 
nanoverse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 650
Default

Originally Posted by blade329
Having problems building the shocks. I have always sucked at this. In regards to the emulsion caps with the bleeding screws. I followed the directions on a Youtube video, but the shocks never come out right for me. I'll compress the shaft all the way up, some oil comes out, then put the bleed screw into the cap. I pull the shaft all the way down, then it gets sucked back up on it's own. What causes this? I followed the bleed instructions exactly, but it doesn't work for me. What am I doing wrong?
Build with no rebound (shock all the way up). Close screw and pump shock multiple times in an upward position. Open screw when shaft is extended and slowly push in. Usually some oil still seeps out. Close screw.
nanoverse is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 04:13 AM
  #4043  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Leominster,Ma.
Posts: 656
Default

Originally Posted by blade329
I'll be looking at that with great interest.
+1 sounds awesome .
Losi57 is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 05:13 AM
  #4044  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Grandturk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,485
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by rcgod
Just called nitrohouse and they discontinued the 1.0 bump chassis and are working on a 2.0 chassis with different braces and a receiver box.
I'd be happy with just a Bump version of the stock 2.0 without any bells and whistles. The original Bump held up great and I don't need a receiver box.
Grandturk is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 07:06 AM
  #4045  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (33)
 
rcgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Blackfoot Idaho.
Posts: 3,464
Trader Rating: 33 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by OfnaJoe
Will the battery strap from the 2.0 fit the 1.0 ?
Not unless you modify the tray. Would have to add the 2.0 standoffs to the 1.0 tray. I have both and like Velcro better.
rcgod is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 07:06 AM
  #4046  
Tech Master
iTrader: (30)
 
maddog9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,303
Trader Rating: 30 (100%+)
Default

Tried the new dunford setup minus the shock pistons and oils(running the 2 hole still) on a dusty medium traction track. Overall im undecided if i like it. I do like the extra acceleration in a straight line. I liked the extra droop in the front as it made the front come down quicker in the air to get the front tires to land on the down side of every jump. The extra kick-up in combo with the extra droop did put more weight to the rear as the front end raise up under acceleration. Black springs and hubs all the way back did make the car more stable(all ready did this prior to the setup change). Car seemed like it had almost too much on power steering. More steering overall, just need a slight more stability so i can stand on it even more when needed without worrying about washout in a turn. Wish i had some lap time comparisons. Not sure if 5 in the center would help to get a little more stability. The car is almost there keep up dunford and casper!
maddog9 is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 07:16 AM
  #4047  
Tech Prophet
 
tc5 man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: levittown pa
Posts: 16,997
Default

Originally Posted by blade329
Having problems building the shocks. I have always sucked at this. In regards to the emulsion caps with the bleeding screws. I followed the directions on a Youtube video, but the shocks never come out right for me. I'll compress the shaft all the way up, some oil comes out, then put the bleed screw into the cap. I pull the shaft all the way down, then it gets sucked back up on it's own. What causes this? I followed the bleed instructions exactly, but it doesn't work for me. What am I doing wrong?



Yea i had the same issue but im pretty sure it stop doing that once i ran my truck a few times i dont think it causes issues . I had some rebound in my i dont think i noticed it on the track .
tc5 man is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 07:50 AM
  #4048  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (114)
 
blade329's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Glendora, CA
Posts: 5,124
Trader Rating: 114 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Casper
With an emulsion shock you have to let the shock suck some air. You are creating a vaccum in the shock when you push the shaft all the way up to displace the oil and then seal it off. Stroke the shock back and forth a few times and it should normalize. A little suck back is not bad as well as a touch of rebound. It is the shock trying to normalize itself.
It worked! I did this last night and worked great. Thanks again.
blade329 is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 07:58 AM
  #4049  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (34)
 
Casper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orange, Ca
Posts: 17,869
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by maddog9
Tried the new dunford setup minus the shock pistons and oils(running the 2 hole still) on a dusty medium traction track. Overall im undecided if i like it. I do like the extra acceleration in a straight line. I liked the extra droop in the front as it made the front come down quicker in the air to get the front tires to land on the down side of every jump. The extra kick-up in combo with the extra droop did put more weight to the rear as the front end raise up under acceleration. Black springs and hubs all the way back did make the car more stable(all ready did this prior to the setup change). Car seemed like it had almost too much on power steering. More steering overall, just need a slight more stability so i can stand on it even more when needed without worrying about washout in a turn. Wish i had some lap time comparisons. Not sure if 5 in the center would help to get a little more stability. The car is almost there keep up dunford and casper!
Ryan suggests to double check your toe out in the front. Push the front tires in to take out steering slop when adjusting toe out on the front end. A little more toe out will make the truck more stable on exit. If your track is bumpy or loose 5K in the center would calm it down but take away a little of that forward bite you like. The other setup changes effect the forward drive as well so it should not be a dramatic change in foward bite.
Casper is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 08:36 AM
  #4050  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,557
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by maddog9
Tried the new dunford setup minus the shock pistons and oils(running the 2 hole still) on a dusty medium traction track. Overall im undecided if i like it. I do like the extra acceleration in a straight line. I liked the extra droop in the front as it made the front come down quicker in the air to get the front tires to land on the down side of every jump. The extra kick-up in combo with the extra droop did put more weight to the rear as the front end raise up under acceleration. Black springs and hubs all the way back did make the car more stable(all ready did this prior to the setup change). Car seemed like it had almost too much on power steering. More steering overall, just need a slight more stability so i can stand on it even more when needed without worrying about washout in a turn. Wish i had some lap time comparisons. Not sure if 5 in the center would help to get a little more stability. The car is almost there keep up dunford and casper!
Thanks or the feedback, still working on it a bit. I can tell you that when Casper changed to the 4 hole setup, it locked his truck in a bit better. It does not land as good as the 2 hole setup with the shocks though. We are still messing around to find a balance there.
hacker07 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.