Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Kyosho Ultima RB6 & RB6.6 Car Thread >

Kyosho Ultima RB6 & RB6.6 Car Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree172Likes

Kyosho Ultima RB6 & RB6.6 Car Thread

    Hide Wikipost
Old 12-21-2016, 08:46 AM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Kyosho Ultima RB6 & RB6.6 Car Thread
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: tobamiester
RB6.6 Kyosho America Product Page: http://www.kyoshoamerica.com/ULTIMA-...T_p_24505.html

RB6.6 Manual http://www.kyosho.com/jpn/support/in...A_RB6_6_IM.pdf

RB6.6 Kyosho Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vW_sR667utY

MSRP $639 MAP $399.99

-------------------------------
New RB6.6 parts (compared exploded views, prices and links are Kyosho America):

Chassis:
  1. Main chassis - UM731 - $125.99
  2. Side guards - UM732 - $9.99

Battery Holder:
  1. Battery plate - UM733 - $8.99
  2. Battery foam - UM741 - $7.99

Rear Bulkheads:
  1. MM3 and Laydown - UM740 - $9.99
    • MM3 bulkhead
    • Laydown bulkhead
    • Swaybar Holders

3 Gear Transmission (MM and RM):
  1. Transmission - UM734 - $10.99
    • transmission cases
    • spacers
    • caps
    • plastic FR & RR suspension hangers

  2. Gear Cover - UM735 - $6.99

Laydown Transmission (3 and 4 gear possible):
  1. Transmission - UM736 - $10.99
    • transmission cases
    • spacers
    • caps
    • required extra hardware
    • pastic FR suspension hanger

  2. 40T idler - UM737 - $6.99
  3. Motor plate - UM738 - $18.99
  4. Gear cover - UM739 - $6.99

Body:
  1. Blade body - UMB05 - $27.99

Optional Parts:
  1. Lightweigt Blade body - UMB05LW - $31.99
  2. Aluminum FR suspension hanger - UMW705B - $28.99 (may be able to file UMW705 to fit)
  3. Brass FR suspension hanger - UMW725B - $30.99 (looks more different than UMW725..someone confirm?)

Typical Upgrades for new RB6.6 Buyers

UMW701 Aluminum Steering Plate (RB6)
UMW702 Aluminum Crank Arm (RB6)
UMW704-0 V2 Aluminum Rear Hub Set(0°/RB6)
UMW705B Aluminum Rear Sus. Holder (RF/RB6.6) or brass UMW725B
UMW707 Aluminum Rear Sus. Holder (RR-Mid)

Nice to have:

UMW723 Aluminum Front Sus Block (Type B/10g/RB6/RT6/SC6).


Aftermarket Parts:

Front Wing: https://www.prolineracing.com/perfor...mount-alum-rb6

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2012, 12:18 AM
  #91  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 187
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Tomczyk
I'm not too thrilled about it.

No more t-plate=no more traction

Looks like a Kyosho 22, no thanks. Pretty soon you'll all be raising your trannies searching for rear grip. Hopefully I'm wrong but only time will tell.
he

The reason 22's lack rear traction is NOT the aluminium chassis nor the fact they don't have t-plates. Look at the DEX201 which is uses the same layout...plenty of rear traction there. The plastics on the 22 are just too damn stiff!
nitroargi is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 12:22 AM
  #92  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (124)
 
vr6cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 4,050
Trader Rating: 124 (100%+)
Default

when I had my rb5 sp I broke alot. Alot stupid shock caps for whatever reason and the rear axles snapped off with the tire still attached a few times. Those are 17 bux a single side. Then the T-plates.

Car was fast though and I liked it more then my B4. I drive a 22 now and simply love it. Suits me well. Maybe this Rb6 might suit me now better too. Interested but I'll buy a used one whenever one of you want to sell one. hehe I can wait.
vr6cj is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 12:44 AM
  #93  
Tech Master
iTrader: (96)
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,550
Trader Rating: 96 (100%+)
Default

Like I said, I could be wrong. Looks like the same rear axles though. You'd think they'd address the biggest issue of the previous car, although I think the breakages may have had to do with heat treatment and at some point Kyosho changed it because I got my WC about 6 months ago and mine just keep bending rather than breaking.

Simple fact is, it looks A LOT like a 22. A lot of former 22 owners have a bad taste left in their mouths from that car. It will have to win us over, maybe it will, maybe it won't.
Eric Tomczyk is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 01:12 AM
  #94  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (14)
 
Lonestar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,041
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Orion_2kTC
Along with KO this seems to justify the price.
Mugen too...
Lonestar is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 05:11 AM
  #95  
Tech Master
iTrader: (9)
 
jelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: here
Posts: 1,007
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

so what does it look like we can use from the old car?

wheels, shocks (minus caps), gear box, rear hubs
jelly is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 05:38 AM
  #96  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
MrJinx76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cairns
Posts: 440
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default ZX6?

Any news of a matching 4WD to go with the RB6?
MrJinx76 is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 06:25 AM
  #97  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
SMOKE-DOG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 105
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

I don't like the front shock tower. Looks too much like the B4 which I thought was silly. Should have kept the low profile RB5 one. Looked much cleaner.
SMOKE-DOG is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 07:03 AM
  #98  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (7)
 
SUPERLOOPER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dalton,Ga
Posts: 2,238
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by nitroargi
he

The reason 22's lack rear traction is NOT the aluminium chassis nor the fact they don't have t-plates. Look at the DEX201 which is uses the same layout...plenty of rear traction there. The plastics on the 22 are just too damn stiff!
My 22 has plenty of traction. What set up are you running on your 22? Or do you even have one?

Brian
SUPERLOOPER is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 07:12 AM
  #99  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 187
Default

Hey Brian,

I don't own a 22...never said i did. I can have an opinion though since there are some top guys driving 22's in my local track. I am not trying to say that is a bad car, and to be completely honest I don't care if it is a bad car or not...I am just saying that not having a t-plate is not the sole reason for low traction
nitroargi is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 07:42 AM
  #100  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (7)
 
SUPERLOOPER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dalton,Ga
Posts: 2,238
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by nitroargi
Hey Brian,

I don't own a 22...never said i did. I can have an opinion though since there are some top guys driving 22's in my local track. I am not trying to say that is a bad car, and to be completely honest I don't care if it is a bad car or not...I am just saying that not having a t-plate is not the sole reason for low traction

Cool. I like the new Kyosho. If it wasn't so expensive I would not mind having one.

Brian

Last edited by SUPERLOOPER; 08-01-2012 at 07:56 AM.
SUPERLOOPER is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 07:52 AM
  #101  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
 
asc6000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Meridian Idaho
Posts: 3,412
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by mdowney
Man, you guys know so much about RC cars that you can tell how well they will perform just by looking at pictures! That's impressive!

LOL I'm with you, thats a mirror your'e looking at, who can tell it's a better car from just looking at the pics? All I'm sayin is it is such a big change in design that I don't see it driving at all like the current rb5. Obviously it should be better and most likely it is. But last year after a long hiatus from the sport I bought 4 new 2w buggies and settled on the rb5 because the laps times were low and I liked how it drove. The new car is a radically different design and "looks" like it is a combination of the 3 brands I didn't like. Even if it "looked" like the current car I still wouldn't be preordering just because it's new.
But it's a personal philosophy more than a statement about the car. BITD I would have used every connection I had to get the newest fastest car and parts and tricks before my competitors. But I'm not racing 3-4 times a week and I like some other luxuries in life so it's just more practical for me too wait.
One race by their premier driver and one press release ain't gonna do it for me.
asc6000 is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 07:58 AM
  #102  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
 
asc6000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Meridian Idaho
Posts: 3,412
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by hairymuffin
nice ride asc6000...
thanks, got one nib and this ones my runner but I don't have the balls to actually run it.
asc6000 is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 08:02 AM
  #103  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
umm winning's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 988
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

$584.99 for a 2wd buggy... Put me on the used waiting list.
umm winning is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 08:24 AM
  #104  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: East Atl Metro Area
Posts: 4,556
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by SUPERLOOPER
Cool. I like the new Kyosho. If it wasn't so expensive I would not mind having one.

Brian
I am in that same group Mr. Looper.

If you see one in the flesh anytime soon, it won't be mine.

Also, I reserve the right to change my mind later or purchase used. I have been known to be wishy washy.
Rfury is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 08:26 AM
  #105  
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
CoryD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,187
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by umm winning
$584.99 for a 2wd buggy... Put me on the used waiting list.
$425 usd...not $584.99...haven't seen anyone listing it that high yet...

Later
CoryD is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.