Electric Night Racing at Littlehampton
#166
Glad everyone had a good night, the club committee are very good at listening to constructive comments and personally I think it's great that racers are offering their opinions, I am sure the organisers of the new Friday night racing will put some thought into any suggestions and respond in due course.
Cheers
Cheers
With Caseys comments, I agree with the Grid placement for postions 1 and 2. When the guy takes off from 2nd grid spot, it gets scary as they are running up the inside of the 1st guy and you end up with a huge 1st corner shunt, haha.
It's warming to see that suggestions are taken onboard The friday night racing is excellent, and with a few minior adjustments it should be spot on
Cheers,
Tom
#167
Totally agree about a single qualifying and then three mains. If we get time for a 4th main (we ran 5 times Friday) that's a bonus.
I think when first conceived, it was expected a few more would run 21.5T and we would have two different heats - not just an A&B 13.5T
Grid comment is probably correct too. Nothing to stop us forming up that way as a trial at the next meet I expect?
I think when first conceived, it was expected a few more would run 21.5T and we would have two different heats - not just an A&B 13.5T
Grid comment is probably correct too. Nothing to stop us forming up that way as a trial at the next meet I expect?
#168
Totally agree about a single qualifying and then three mains. If we get time for a 4th main (we ran 5 times Friday) that's a bonus.
I think when first conceived, it was expected a few more would run 21.5T and we would have two different heats - not just an A&B 13.5T
Grid comment is probably correct too. Nothing to stop us forming up that way as a trial at the next meet I expect?
I think when first conceived, it was expected a few more would run 21.5T and we would have two different heats - not just an A&B 13.5T
Grid comment is probably correct too. Nothing to stop us forming up that way as a trial at the next meet I expect?
#169
Tech Fanatic
Hi guys,
my opinion is:
YES for having a qualy/final format. May be if we have 4 runs, 2 qualy with the best one to count and two final with the best one to count. If we have 5 runs, 3qualy with the best two based on points count and two final best one count.
YES for position two on the grid to be the TQ position.
YES to have a RD do a random scrutineer.
Thanks
my opinion is:
YES for having a qualy/final format. May be if we have 4 runs, 2 qualy with the best one to count and two final with the best one to count. If we have 5 runs, 3qualy with the best two based on points count and two final best one count.
YES for position two on the grid to be the TQ position.
YES to have a RD do a random scrutineer.
Thanks
#170
Hi guys,
my opinion is:
YES for having a qualy/final format. May be if we have 4 runs, 2 qualy with the best one to count and two final with the best one to count. If we have 5 runs, 3qualy with the best two based on points count and two final best one count.
YES for position two on the grid to be the TQ position.
YES to have a RD do a random scrutineer.
Thanks
my opinion is:
YES for having a qualy/final format. May be if we have 4 runs, 2 qualy with the best one to count and two final with the best one to count. If we have 5 runs, 3qualy with the best two based on points count and two final best one count.
YES for position two on the grid to be the TQ position.
YES to have a RD do a random scrutineer.
Thanks
#171
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
Hi guys,
my opinion is:
YES for having a qualy/final format. May be if we have 4 runs, 2 qualy with the best one to count and two final with the best one to count. If we have 5 runs, 3qualy with the best two based on points count and two final best one count.
YES for position two on the grid to be the TQ position.
YES to have a RD do a random scrutineer.
Thanks
my opinion is:
YES for having a qualy/final format. May be if we have 4 runs, 2 qualy with the best one to count and two final with the best one to count. If we have 5 runs, 3qualy with the best two based on points count and two final best one count.
YES for position two on the grid to be the TQ position.
YES to have a RD do a random scrutineer.
Thanks
#172
Well, if you (we) seriously want some of this "altered" two ways to get it considered as members;
- go a club meeting to bring it up
- speak to swanny (electric delegate) and get his support so he can bring it up
The former is the best way.
No good trying to make significant changes 10min before the night is due to kick off, that's too short notice on those volunteering their time to make the night run.
- go a club meeting to bring it up
- speak to swanny (electric delegate) and get his support so he can bring it up
The former is the best way.
No good trying to make significant changes 10min before the night is due to kick off, that's too short notice on those volunteering their time to make the night run.
#173
I like the idea of some scrutineering as well. Not to catch people cheating because I'm concerned per se, but more to show club professionalism and also to educate.
I don't think it would need to a RD necessarily.
A proposal could be;
Group of say 3-6 regular members who know the rules, how to use the measuring equipment and race regularly assigned as potential Scrutes.
1 person from each heat on the night is given the job to check the opposite group.
Each heat/race 1-2 cars are pulled at random at the finish with the aim of everyone being checked min. once ever meet.
Check as a minimum;
- body number and cut lines
- min. weight
- blinky mode proven
- motor legal
Blinky can be troublesome as each ESC brand has a different way of proving it, but as long as the Scrutes are educated on the major brands in use (HW, LRP, Orca etc) then it won't be too much of a problem. Novaks for example don't actually "blink" when in blinky!
Aside from perhaps giving the scrutineer on the night "some" grace when it comes to marshalling - to make up for time lost at their pit - it's not really that big a deal.
We don't need to go to the extent of marking bodies/chassis nor do we need to check every car, every race IMHO.
I don't think it would need to a RD necessarily.
A proposal could be;
Group of say 3-6 regular members who know the rules, how to use the measuring equipment and race regularly assigned as potential Scrutes.
1 person from each heat on the night is given the job to check the opposite group.
Each heat/race 1-2 cars are pulled at random at the finish with the aim of everyone being checked min. once ever meet.
Check as a minimum;
- body number and cut lines
- min. weight
- blinky mode proven
- motor legal
Blinky can be troublesome as each ESC brand has a different way of proving it, but as long as the Scrutes are educated on the major brands in use (HW, LRP, Orca etc) then it won't be too much of a problem. Novaks for example don't actually "blink" when in blinky!
Aside from perhaps giving the scrutineer on the night "some" grace when it comes to marshalling - to make up for time lost at their pit - it's not really that big a deal.
We don't need to go to the extent of marking bodies/chassis nor do we need to check every car, every race IMHO.
#174
Hi guys,
my opinion is:
YES for having a qualy/final format. May be if we have 4 runs, 2 qualy with the best one to count and two final with the best one to count. If we have 5 runs, 3qualy with the best two based on points count and two final best one count.
YES for position two on the grid to be the TQ position.
YES to have a RD do a random scrutineer.
Thanks
my opinion is:
YES for having a qualy/final format. May be if we have 4 runs, 2 qualy with the best one to count and two final with the best one to count. If we have 5 runs, 3qualy with the best two based on points count and two final best one count.
YES for position two on the grid to be the TQ position.
YES to have a RD do a random scrutineer.
Thanks
#175
Hi guys,
my opinion is:
YES for having a qualy/final format. May be if we have 4 runs, 2 qualy with the best one to count and two final with the best one to count. If we have 5 runs, 3qualy with the best two based on points count and two final best one count.
YES for position two on the grid to be the TQ position.
YES to have a RD do a random scrutineer.
Thanks
my opinion is:
YES for having a qualy/final format. May be if we have 4 runs, 2 qualy with the best one to count and two final with the best one to count. If we have 5 runs, 3qualy with the best two based on points count and two final best one count.
YES for position two on the grid to be the TQ position.
YES to have a RD do a random scrutineer.
Thanks
#176
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
Hi guys I'm trying to get in touch with people who have mini's (tamiya) so I can try and drum up some numbers for the next meet. It appears the class has died off at hh and most people are running other class's now. So if you know of anyone who might be interested could you put them in touch with me. Cheers
#177
Long shot here but did anyone happen to pickup a set of protoform crosshairs at the track last meet?
Brand new in the packet.... I think I might have dropped them in the carpark perhaps.
Not impressed with myself if I did!!
Brand new in the packet.... I think I might have dropped them in the carpark perhaps.
Not impressed with myself if I did!!
#178
Race
Geez this Friday night is going to be a ripper with 33 deg forecast, perfecto for night racing.
Keep your nominations flowing and your points ticking over, it's a double header weekend for 13.5T so while your nominating for Friday may as well nominate for Sunday as well !!!!
FUN FUN & MORE FUN 😄😉
Keep your nominations flowing and your points ticking over, it's a double header weekend for 13.5T so while your nominating for Friday may as well nominate for Sunday as well !!!!
FUN FUN & MORE FUN 😄😉
#179
I'd prefer it not to be double headers personally.
One day a week is as far as the leave pass stretches.
One day a week is as far as the leave pass stretches.
#180
My prenuptial stipulates I can race as many meetings in a season as I like.
Silly me should have also included I can spend as much money as I like lol!!!!
Cheers