2008 AARCMCC WA EP 1/10th OFFROAD STATE TITLES
#17
DOH, this event is on the same time as FEMCA
#18
#19
is qualifing for 4wd on sun as well
if so does that mean i can run sun only?
if so does that mean i can run sun only?
#20
entry list
Can someone post an entry list?
Leigh Cheeseman
Leigh Cheeseman
#21
Super Stock
All i can see under the AARCMCC rules is super stock classes (like Trev has pointed out) and they are using 19t motors and 10.5 B/Less motors that is for 2wd and 4wd, there is no seniors event if it is run under the current AARCMCC rules. Seniors can run these classes under the following rule straight from the July 2008 rules.
"Senior Drivers are to be a minimum age of 40 years at the time of the event. Seniors are to compete in the Super
Stock class. The highest placed Senior will be recognised as state or national champion for their performance for
2WD and 4WD"
Therefore the classes should be changed to there correct name meaning that anyone can event these classes..
J-ME
#22
LIPO
Charge up those lipo's, there now legal for this event,YEAH
#23
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
Further discussion on WA off road states can be found here
http://www.teamadrenaline.net/forums...isplay.php?f=5
http://www.teamadrenaline.net/forums...isplay.php?f=5
#24
who ever is organising this event can ya get ya crap together and send me an email as to weather you recived my applicaton ive sent you guys 1 app and 2 emails com on guys your spose to be a sanction club act like one please
#26
WA TITLES
Hello.............anyone there?
#27
Tech Regular
As much as I would like this to be the case, I would ring first to get the information as I have heard differently. It has been stated above that the event would be run to aarcmcc rules, but apparently that allows for host clubs of aarcmcc events not being obliged to adopt the early change?
Personally cannot see why not to allow lipo as they offer no performance advantage in and the running of them by others should offer no disadvantage to those with NiMhs, but this is up to the host club.
Personally cannot see why not to allow lipo as they offer no performance advantage in and the running of them by others should offer no disadvantage to those with NiMhs, but this is up to the host club.
#28
Tech Master
iTrader: (77)
As much as I would like this to be the case, I would ring first to get the information as I have heard differently. It has been stated above that the event would be run to aarcmcc rules, but apparently that allows for host clubs of aarcmcc events not being obliged to adopt the early change?
Personally cannot see why not to allow lipo as they offer no performance advantage in and the running of them by others should offer no disadvantage to those with NiMhs, but this is up to the host club.
Personally cannot see why not to allow lipo as they offer no performance advantage in and the running of them by others should offer no disadvantage to those with NiMhs, but this is up to the host club.
#29
still no replys com on guys you are coming accross AS TOTALY BLODDY USELESS