Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree4Likes

Tamiya TRF417

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2013, 05:21 AM
  #5716  
Tech Regular
 
C van der Hagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 311
Default

Originally Posted by CraigM
Not true, they are 64 pitch
Not true, they are 0.4 module. See TRF417V5 box sleeve.

64dp and 0.4 module gears are not interchangeable!!
C van der Hagen is offline  
Old 07-27-2013, 06:16 AM
  #5717  
Tech Addict
 
Skitee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 745
Default

Originally Posted by C van der Hagen
Not true, they are 0.4 module. See TRF417V5 box sleeve.

64dp and 0.4 module gears are not interchangeable!!
That's also not true, the 0.4 module and 64dp is that close that you can run them together. I've used my tamiya pinions on 64dp spurs for a number of years , So I KNOW that they work together without reliability issues. 48dp and 0.6 module on the other hand do not work together.
Skitee is offline  
Old 07-27-2013, 07:11 AM
  #5718  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (34)
 
RedBullFiXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Intergalactic Planetary
Posts: 6,542
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Skitee
That's also not true, the 0.4 module and 64dp is that close that you can run them together. I've used my tamiya pinions on 64dp spurs for a number of years , So I KNOW that they work together without reliability issues. 48dp and 0.6 module on the other hand do not work together.
+1
RedBullFiXX is offline  
Old 07-27-2013, 06:39 PM
  #5719  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (34)
 
CraigM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,009
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by vivo quevas
Is this true by using B blocks reducing track width will increase steering?
Yes and no, it definitely makes the car more twitchy, I find wider like C/C has more mid corner steering and steers more "round" in corners. I always start with C/C XA/E and go from there, and I always use split blocks front and rear

Originally Posted by dizope
I have been running AE 40wt shock oil (500 cst) in the rear diffs. This works fine for the TC6.1.

Okay. Ordered AE 2k diff oil and HPI silver springs yesterday. Ran out of time to order the large springs cups but am going to now.

Should I order any suspension blocks?

What do you mean lower the bottom arm roll center to 0mm/0.5mm?
The TC6 diff has a much lower volume than the TRF diff, so you need to use a much thicker oil in your TRF diff

In the suspension you have 2 places you can change the roll centre. Upper arm by changing the camber link shims and lower arm by changing the spacing under the suspension blocks. 0mm/0.5mm means you'll have no spacers under the FF block and 0.5mm (kit) spacing under the FR split blocks.

See above about the blocks I run

Originally Posted by DPRacing
hi guys, have a few questions about the shocks (417x basic)

- Which O-rings are recommendable? Tamiya # 42137 O-ring or X-ring #42214? or what is the difference?

Or O-rings other manufacturers?( I read a few years time, Jilles drive Muchmore o-ring 50) .

- build with one o-ring + shaft guide or 2 o-rings?


- what advantage brings a downstop O-Ring?

Thanks for answer!
Shaft guide and 1 x ring. I can never remember which x-ring to use, someone else will chime in. It can help to use shims to squeeze the x-ring for a better seal. I haven't seen a downstop o-ring used in years on the tamiya, the team used to sometimes run it on carpet to stop traction roll

Originally Posted by dizope
I was able to get some more throw out of the servo last night by extending the EPA to 150% (R) and 125% (L). It was at 100% previously.

I installed the servo saver per the manual, one tooth (5*) to the left with the servo in neutral. I built the servo turnbuckle with a 4.5mm gap, like the manual recommends.

I read earlier in this thread where someone else went from a Savox 1258 to a 1251 and had the same lack of throw problem.

All of my other models have 1258's and don't need past 100% EPA. I use an Airtronics MT-4 transmitter.

I used an angle finder to set the throw to roughly 27 degrees (~1mm) from the c-hub. In doing this, I realized the left side has more throw than the right side. Trim is at zero. Subtrim is at R20. REV is normal.

With the EPA extended, I now have a tighter turning radius but is that the correct fix or do I have some other mechanical issue.
I can't really comment on your servo, but as long as you can get full throw you're good. My subtrim is about the same. Here's how I mount my servo horn, with right angle to the link

CraigM is offline  
Old 07-28-2013, 08:38 AM
  #5720  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
narcotiks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 452
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

With silicon oil you run the 50x o-ring and with mineral oil(TRF) the 70x ring The competition blue ring works well too, it seals a little better than the x-ring but the x-ring gives the smoothest action.
What shims do you use Craig? I've only got 0.1 in, i tried with 0.2 but it wasn't as smooth.
narcotiks is offline  
Old 07-28-2013, 03:21 PM
  #5721  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (34)
 
CraigM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,009
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by narcotiks
With silicon oil you run the 50x o-ring and with mineral oil(TRF) the 70x ring The competition blue ring works well too, it seals a little better than the x-ring but the x-ring gives the smoothest action.
What shims do you use Craig? I've only got 0.1 in, i tried with 0.2 but it wasn't as smooth.
.4 with the x-rings
CraigM is offline  
Old 07-29-2013, 10:43 AM
  #5722  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Central CA
Posts: 157
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by CraigM
The TC6 diff has a much lower volume than the TRF diff, so you need to use a much thicker oil in your TRF diff

In the suspension you have 2 places you can change the roll centre. Upper arm by changing the camber link shims and lower arm by changing the spacing under the suspension blocks. 0mm/0.5mm means you'll have no spacers under the FF block and 0.5mm (kit) spacing under the FR split blocks.

See above about the blocks I run

I can't really comment on your servo, but as long as you can get full throw you're good. My subtrim is about the same. Here's how I mount my servo horn, with right angle to the link
Craig, thanks for the help. I ran the car this weekend and it was night and day better with the additional steering throw.
dizope is offline  
Old 07-29-2013, 06:58 PM
  #5723  
Tech Regular
 
nolo148's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 318
Default

What is the largest 48p spur that will fit on the 417x?
nolo148 is offline  
Old 07-31-2013, 06:38 AM
  #5724  
Tech Master
iTrader: (35)
 
Csaari77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 1,523
Trader Rating: 35 (100%+)
Default

I'm currently running my camber links in the longest position front and rear. The car is very stable and easy to drive but I'm trying to get it to transition faster from corner to corner. Will shortening the links improve the transition speed? If I shorten the links will I need to make adjustments to the roll center to maintain the stability that I have?
Csaari77 is offline  
Old 07-31-2013, 07:10 AM
  #5725  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 321
Default

Shortening links will transition faster from corner to corner, The middle hole is the best allround option for most tracks
Smartypants is offline  
Old 08-02-2013, 04:31 AM
  #5726  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 234
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

I have to say i really like the 417v5. coming from a t3 the tamiya is really smooth and consistent.
rayrush is offline  
Old 08-03-2013, 02:05 PM
  #5727  
Tech Adept
 
NItrox416's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 170
Default

At euros I haven't seen any upgrades on the car, despite the fact that marc as well as jilles feel that the car is very inconsistent.
We can expect a competitive 418 or not?
NItrox416 is offline  
Old 08-03-2013, 02:28 PM
  #5728  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (32)
 
syndr0me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 5280 Raceway
Posts: 13,279
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Tamiya needs to make a strong move with their next kit, that's for sure.
syndr0me is offline  
Old 08-03-2013, 03:07 PM
  #5729  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (120)
 
Potoczak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 3,702
Trader Rating: 120 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by syndr0me
Tamiya needs to make a strong move with their next kit, that's for sure.
+1
Potoczak is offline  
Old 08-04-2013, 03:35 AM
  #5730  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (34)
 
CraigM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,009
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by NItrox416
At euros I haven't seen any upgrades on the car, despite the fact that marc as well as jilles feel that the car is very inconsistent.
We can expect a competitive 418 or not?
So you haven't seen the new tamiya motor mount? Chassis? Top deck?

Are you not competitive with your current car? If so do you blame the car? I made RROC and AOC A-mains with this car. There's nothing wrong with it
CraigM is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.