Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree4Likes

Tamiya TRF417

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-2012, 07:28 AM
  #4006  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 468
Default

What is the difference on the new motor mount?
scoyle is offline  
Old 10-11-2012, 09:17 AM
  #4007  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: santa monica / manchester
Posts: 1,426
Default

My friend told me that it is lighter. Although it may be because it doesn't include the centre brace that is missing (he was told by a Tamiya rep at the model show).
Qatmix is offline  
Old 10-11-2012, 10:33 AM
  #4008  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 574
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by scoyle
What is the difference on the new motor mount?
I wonder if these alignment pins are new? Not clear from looking at the mount itself, but more clear on the the bottom of the chassis.

napoleon1981 is offline  
Old 10-11-2012, 10:38 AM
  #4009  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (88)
 
artwork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Thornton, CO
Posts: 3,511
Trader Rating: 88 (100%+)
Default

I wonder why the design has moved to Aeration shocks vs Bladder shocks. In what conditions do each type of shock excel? Anyone know?
artwork is offline  
Old 10-11-2012, 11:20 AM
  #4010  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
 
CristianTabush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,165
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Honestly, it is part gimmick, part necessity for the worlds.

Typically it is claimed that Emulsion (aeration) shocks promote more traction and handle bumps better.

However, In all the experiments that I did running on-road and offroad, I found the most grip and best bump handling came from soft bladders and drilled shock caps. In the past, when we used to not drill shock caps, then emulsion shocks were better.

I read in several places that Jilles used them for increased traction, since they ran no additives, this probably is the explanation.

Now why is Tamiya offering it like this? It's just the way they have always done it from what I remember. It seems that every so often, when they release their cars, they are replicas that commemorate some big event win. Last big one was the Worlds and this car is equipped with what JG ran. Next version, they might go back to bladders, who knows.
CristianTabush is offline  
Old 10-11-2012, 12:47 PM
  #4011  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (28)
 
hanulec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: @ the post office
Posts: 10,278
Trader Rating: 28 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by CristianTabush
Honestly, it is part gimmick, part necessity for the worlds.

Typically it is claimed that Emulsion (aeration) shocks promote more traction and handle bumps better.

However, In all the experiments that I did running on-road and offroad, I found the most grip and best bump handling came from soft bladders and drilled shock caps. In the past, when we used to not drill shock caps, then emulsion shocks were better.

I read in several places that Jilles used them for increased traction, since they ran no additives, this probably is the explanation.

Now why is Tamiya offering it like this? It's just the way they have always done it from what I remember. It seems that every so often, when they release their cars, they are replicas that commemorate some big event win. Last big one was the Worlds and this car is equipped with what JG ran. Next version, they might go back to bladders, who knows.
Ct- u should have seen the factory yokomos at iic. When grip was low they ran emulsion shocks and where killing it...
hanulec is offline  
Old 10-11-2012, 12:52 PM
  #4012  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
 
CristianTabush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,165
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Good to know Mike. I have been playing with it a bit, but our tracks have too much grip to see a benefit my rsd6 actuallyvhas too much grip most of the time
CristianTabush is offline  
Old 10-11-2012, 04:55 PM
  #4013  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Somewhere, but not here...
Posts: 550
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by kentech
http://kentech.blogs.se/ and http://www.tamiya.com/japan/hobbysho...port/news1.htm for first actual pictures on the TRF417 V5 Premium Package...

In the pic it looks like the wheels are offset +2 or +4 mm. correct me if I'm wrong. Very nice looking car!
Obsidian is offline  
Old 10-11-2012, 09:17 PM
  #4014  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Nuno Gancho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 425
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Hi All,

What do you mean by emulsion shocks? Having a hole in the top cap?

Thanks.
Nuno Gancho is offline  
Old 10-11-2012, 10:11 PM
  #4015  
PDR
Tech Elite
iTrader: (31)
 
PDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,145
Trader Rating: 31 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Nuno Gancho
Hi All,

What do you mean by emulsion shocks? Having a hole in the top cap?

Thanks.
The attached picture is from the TRF201 buggy. Although the parts may well be different, I think the basic design concepts will be very similar.
Attached Thumbnails Tamiya TRF417-aeration-damper-assembly.jpg  
PDR is offline  
Old 10-11-2012, 10:19 PM
  #4016  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (52)
 
Cpt.America's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington State
Posts: 11,085
Trader Rating: 52 (100%+)
Default

can anybody reference the part numbers for the seperate suspension mounts for both the front and rear of the 417?
Cpt.America is offline  
Old 10-11-2012, 10:25 PM
  #4017  
PDR
Tech Elite
iTrader: (31)
 
PDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,145
Trader Rating: 31 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Cpt.America
can anybody reference the part numbers for the seperate suspension mounts for both the front and rear of the 417?
From Craig's blog site (http://tchub.wordpress.com):
54171 Separate Sus Mounts 1X
54172 Separate Sus Mounts 1XA/1A
54173 Separate Sus Mounts 1XB/1B
54174 Separate Sus Mounts 1XC/1C
54175 Separate Sus Mounts 1XD/1D
PDR is offline  
Old 10-11-2012, 10:54 PM
  #4018  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (52)
 
Cpt.America's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington State
Posts: 11,085
Trader Rating: 52 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by PDR
From Craig's blog site (http://tchub.wordpress.com):
54171 Separate Sus Mounts 1X
54172 Separate Sus Mounts 1XA/1A
54173 Separate Sus Mounts 1XB/1B
54174 Separate Sus Mounts 1XC/1C
54175 Separate Sus Mounts 1XD/1D
do you know which are the the same track and toe as the stock 1 pieces for front and back?
Cpt.America is offline  
Old 10-12-2012, 12:50 AM
  #4019  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (18)
 
VooDooPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philippines
Posts: 3,715
Trader Rating: 18 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Cpt.America
do you know which are the the same track and toe as the stock 1 pieces for front and back?
same number/letter means the same width as the 1-piece units with the same number/letter...

i.e. 1C is 1C regardless if its with the one-piece or separate blocks.
VooDooPH is offline  
Old 10-12-2012, 12:54 AM
  #4020  
PDR
Tech Elite
iTrader: (31)
 
PDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,145
Trader Rating: 31 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Cpt.America
do you know which are the the same track and toe as the stock 1 pieces for front and back?
It's in the manual, or you simply look at your car

The 417X manual says 1XA for the rear-front, 1C for the front-rear, so that would mean 54172 & 54174 respectively. Note that the split mounts are 2-in-1 (except for the 1X ones).

Various TRF team setup sheets use different blocks. In boosted 17.5, I run 1 degree less rear toe...
PDR is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.