Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Awesomatix EP Touring Car (A700 Shaft Drive) >

Awesomatix EP Touring Car (A700 Shaft Drive)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree143Likes

Awesomatix EP Touring Car (A700 Shaft Drive)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-2012, 07:49 AM
  #1666  
Tech Adept
 
gregsbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 133
Default


VOTE HERE
gregsbox is offline  
Old 02-23-2012, 10:00 AM
  #1667  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 388
Default Awesomatix weight

I am interested in this car.
What does this car weigh raceready, approximately? Must not be more than 1.350 grams!
If it weighs more, than that is for sure a no go.
Kensei is offline  
Old 02-23-2012, 10:10 AM
  #1668  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
erchn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Union City, CA
Posts: 850
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Kensei
I am interested in this car.
What does this car weigh raceready, approximately? Must not be more than 1.350 grams!
If it weighs more, than that is for sure a no go.
Weight will not be a problem. Of course everything is relative to your electronics, battery, fans, etc... As a point of reference, I had to add more weight to the A700 than I did on my Xray T3 '11 to get to the Roar minimum of 1380. But without any weight I would be under 1350.
erchn is offline  
Old 02-23-2012, 10:23 AM
  #1669  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 38
Default

my car weights 1325g with a lightweight mazda body, SP GT2pro, sanwa R451 receiver, SP MMM motor, norsram big mama battery..and sorex 28 tires..
so i do think that this car is a lightweight car..
method699 is offline  
Old 02-23-2012, 12:15 PM
  #1670  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 421
Default

Originally Posted by Kensei
I am interested in this car.
What does this car weigh raceready, approximately? Must not be more than 1.350 grams!
If it weighs more, than that is for sure a no go.
Why?

Weight isn't a problem but saying if it weighs more than 1350g it's a no go is a little short sighted don't you think?
Mb3195 is offline  
Old 02-23-2012, 12:15 PM
  #1671  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 388
Default Awesomatix

I raced RDX Phi'09 stock SP13.5T+LRP SXX Stock Spec during last outdoor summer season.
Then RC10R5 indoor for a short while during indoor winter season.
Now preparing for the upcoming summer outdoor season.
Stockracing 17.5t and/or 13.5t.
Planning on buying all new stuff.
Would this car be a good choice?

Looked at the manual. It says longitudinal placing of motor for 8.5t to 17.5t.
Servo left or right.
What would be the best servoposition? In the past I always had to add extra weight on the LiPo side, so the right side of the car. Not because the car was to light but to balance the car left/right. Car was balanced then, but weight was too high.

What is your experience as to car configuration for stock racing with the Awesomatic?

My first guess would be servo on the right. All cars of other brands always have to add weight on the right side, so where the LiPo is. Maybe that could be avoided with this car by placing the servo on the right. Just spitballing here.......

Any comments on:
- quality of material
- ease of builging the car
- setting the car up
- wear and tear of parts
- continuity in supplying parts
- support from people/factory/and so on
Kensei is offline  
Old 02-23-2012, 12:17 PM
  #1672  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 421
Default

Originally Posted by Kensei
I raced RDX Phi'09 stock SP13.5T+LRP SXX Stock Spec during last outdoor summer season.
Then RC10R5 indoor for a short while during indoor winter season.
Now preparing for the upcoming summer outdoor season.
Stockracing 17.5t and/or 13.5t.
Planning on buying all new stuff.
Would this car be a good choice?

Looked at the manual. It says longitudinal placing of motor for 8.5t to 17.5t.
Servo left or right.
What would be the best servoposition? In the past I always had to add extra weight on the LiPo side, so the right side of the car. Not because the car was to light but to balance the car left/right. Car was balanced then, but weight was too high.

What is your experience as to car configuration for stock racing with the Awesomatic?

My first guess would be servo on the right. All cars of other brands always have to add weight on the right side, so where the LiPo is. Maybe that could be avoided with this car by placing the servo on the right. Just spitballing here.......

Any comments on:
- quality of material
- ease of builging the car
- setting the car up
- wear and tear of parts
- continuity in supplying parts
- support from people/factory/and so on
Excellent on pretty much every level. Servo on all a700 I have see is on the left. Perfect weight left to right. Longitudinal can run with any motor. No point of even trying transverse.
Mb3195 is offline  
Old 02-23-2012, 12:20 PM
  #1673  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 388
Default

Originally Posted by Mb3195
Why?

Weight isn't a problem but saying if it weighs more than 1350g it's a no go is a little short sighted don't you think?
I don't think so at all!
Every LiPo oriented RC Touringcar nowadays is designed upfront to meet certain minimum weight as to regulation. A raceready car nowadays is about 100 gram lighter than a pre-LiPo-car.

But as I understand it the 1,350gr mark isn't a problem with the Awesomatix.
FYI, I almost bought the Schumacher Mi4CXL but didn't afterall because I heard and read about it (reviews and so on) where the weight raceready is 1,395 grams. Thank God I dodged that bullet......

45 grams on a 1/10th scale car is huge.......
Kensei is offline  
Old 02-23-2012, 02:27 PM
  #1674  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Airwave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,127
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

My A700 is 10gr lighter than my TCX, an more Left-Right balanced...

By the way, if you are running 13.5 or 17.3 classes, you could use a shorty pack and mount the servo on the right side...

But I think that the Front/Rear balance will be affected...
Airwave is offline  
Old 02-23-2012, 03:34 PM
  #1675  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 2,567
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Airwave
17.3
For those people who just can't handle that extra .2?

-Mike
grippgoat is offline  
Old 02-25-2012, 09:18 PM
  #1676  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
erchn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Union City, CA
Posts: 850
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

First race report, and first day of asphalt racing for the season.

I started with a mix of various setups, mainly based on the setup posted by Sandy Iavazzo. Main differences in my setup were to go softer all the way around, starting at about 75 gf/mm in front and 82 in the rear (f: a2, b2; r: a3, b2) srs/rhs II for both. I was also running .5mm of anti-squat and anti-dive. My theory was that the car's center of gravity is very low, so run the car soft to get roll but don't let it dive/squat real hard. I also ran a regular weight body to raise the center of gravity a bit.

Right off, given the track temperature, I was overheating tires running that soft, I was also getting far too much body roll. I went a bit stiffer, to around 82/88 front/rear mix, and the car was better, but still a little unstable, though the tire temperatures were better, not fading toward the end of the race.

Eventually, I ended up removing both the anti-squat and anti-dive, and the car was much more predictable, and responsive. I also ended up putting a front anti-sway bar on, making the front-end a bit more responsive. This unfortunately, though somewhat predictably, took away a bit of rotation. I then added a bit more toe-out in the front, and took out a little bit of rear camber. Also ended up adding a 1/2mm of camber gain, compared to Sandy's setup. Finally ended up a bit stiffer spring and more dampening all the way around, settling around 90f/98r.

In the end, Sputnik and I ended up qualified 3rd, and finished fourth. Tough racing with some fast racers here at NorCal.

I'd still like to try lower roll centers, going to 0mm under the arms, and of course try IAS as well. Final setup attached.

Thanks for reading this far, interesting day of racing, and I'm happy with the results, more work to be done.

Ethan
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
asphalt norcal 2-25-2012.pdf (343.0 KB, 254 views)
erchn is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 08:27 AM
  #1677  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Airwave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,127
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by grippgoat
For those people who just can't handle that extra .2?

-Mike
At this level, 0.2 can make all the difference
Airwave is offline  
Old 02-29-2012, 04:12 AM
  #1678  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 977
Default

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEezN...ature=youtu.be

Viljami Kutvonen ( blue A700 TQ car in video ) won the 2nd round of the Finnish TC national series against of Teemu Leino and Matias Kuusinen.
Congratulations to Viljami!
Attached Thumbnails Awesomatix EP Touring Car (A700 Shaft Drive)-ftt_2_2012_103.jpg   Awesomatix EP Touring Car (A700 Shaft Drive)-ftt_2_2012_104.jpg  

Last edited by Oleg Babich; 02-29-2012 at 04:25 AM.
Oleg Babich is offline  
Old 02-29-2012, 07:37 AM
  #1679  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 38
Default

good that the A700 drivers getting good results...
can we have a setup from the Driver if possible mr Oleg..

thanks
method699 is offline  
Old 02-29-2012, 07:42 AM
  #1680  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 38
Default

I've tried Freddy setup from the warmup and found that my chassis is rubbing on the carpet too much, think that the dampening is too soft for me..
i've tried it with Ride32 asphalt tires..don't have a choice we have to drive with it..
i know from the setup it was the CPX.
his someone tried it and what did you change to get it work for u..

thanks
method699 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.