Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
IFMAR Offroad Worlds Winner? >

IFMAR Offroad Worlds Winner?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

IFMAR Offroad Worlds Winner?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2005, 05:17 AM
  #301  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
AdrianM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Saint Petersburg, FL
Posts: 5,946
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

They were running 5 cells to reduce punch. This makes the car easier to drive on slick surfaces. The lower voltage changes the motors powerband.

As said before they had 6 cells in the car but only 5 were connected. They have to do this to meet the minumum weight.
AdrianM is offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 05:33 AM
  #302  
Tech Master
iTrader: (39)
 
Dirt-Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 1,413
Trader Rating: 39 (100%+)
Default

A little disappointing turnout for Schumacher eh Adrian? or was nothing panned out for this years worlds? I know Simon and Rich was there with the new Cat but with the design that everyone seemed to go with on the 4wd it would seem to have stuck it out with the Cat3k?
Dirt-Racer is offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 07:49 AM
  #303  
V12
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
V12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,682
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

On the German forum there was a comment from one of the drivers regarding the 5 cells. It seems there was no grip at all at the track so the 5cell batteries helped a lot. The 6th cell just was used for weight distribution.
V12 is offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 08:47 AM
  #304  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (26)
 
stulec52's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,216
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

so, why not just go back and use some old 2400's then?
Seems crazy that the battery companies spend all their time and money developing faster and longer lasting batteries only for us to go take a cell out.

But, I guess whatever works.

Me, I would think just turning the torque right down on your speedo would work.
stulec52 is offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 09:05 AM
  #305  
Tech Master
iTrader: (39)
 
Dirt-Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 1,413
Trader Rating: 39 (100%+)
Default

Yeah and whats the Slipper for?
Dirt-Racer is offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 09:05 AM
  #306  
Tech Elite
 
GregH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,310
Default

I would think the 2400's would have still to much voltage.
GregH is offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 10:23 AM
  #307  
Tech Master
iTrader: (29)
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego, Ca.
Posts: 1,027
Trader Rating: 29 (100%+)
Default

this wasnt just a normal club race, if you look at the level of driving experience, and think about the suport (electronincs mfg, motor mfg, and car mfg) that was available all week, it seems like adjusting the slipper or speed control probably just wasnt enough, pretty tough group of racers there to second guess....jmo
Mdoc is offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 11:26 AM
  #308  
Tech Regular
 
T. Thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 380
Default

Originally Posted by Dirt-Racer
Yeah and whats the Slipper for?
Slippers are not designed to be used as a traction control. It was designed to increase the life of the diff. When the rear tires bounce around under heavy acceleration, or under heavy power when landing, if the slipper did not give, people would be rebuilding the diffs 10 times as much. A loose slipper will reduce wheel spin, but when the pads heat up tey will just lock up and this in a very inconsistant feel. Anything beyond 2 foot of slip is hard to be set consistant, in my opinion.
T. Thomas is offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 11:28 AM
  #309  
Tech Regular
 
T. Thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 380
Default

I remember when trucks were first run, everyone ran 7 cells and 11 turns. Then one day at a high bite track, the 7 cell factory guy was passed by a 6 cell truck and a 10 turn. Way easier to drive fast. I woudl suspect dropping to the 5 cell configuration, just made it way easier to drive fast without loosing much top end at all.
T. Thomas is offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 12:45 PM
  #310  
Tech Master
iTrader: (39)
 
Dirt-Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 1,413
Trader Rating: 39 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by T. Thomas
Slippers are not designed to be used as a traction control. It was designed to increase the life of the diff. When the rear tires bounce around under heavy acceleration, or under heavy power when landing, if the slipper did not give, people would be rebuilding the diffs 10 times as much. A loose slipper will reduce wheel spin, but when the pads heat up tey will just lock up and this in a very inconsistant feel. Anything beyond 2 foot of slip is hard to be set consistant, in my opinion.
Far as im concerned Traction control is illegal in rc electric racing period!! And so Slippers were made primarily to limit the amount of torque from the motor onto the tyres not to save the diff which is the most ludicrous thing ive heard in a while. Yeah it does help the diff on the way but thats not what the slipper is for in the first place.
Dirt-Racer is offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 01:25 PM
  #311  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (26)
 
stulec52's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,216
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

Dirt Racer,

I agree about traction control being illegal, so wouldn't running 5 cells to limit traction be, by definition illegal??
stulec52 is offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 02:19 PM
  #312  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,499
Default

If you adjust the slipper, you won't get any drive to take the jumps, just won't work, you're not in full control either.

Having raced at that track at last year's off rd Euros, i can understand why they have done this. There is so little traction out there.
MattW is offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 05:10 PM
  #313  
Tech Addict
 
oople's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 586
Default

Originally Posted by Dirt-Racer
Far as im concerned Traction control is illegal in rc electric racing period!! And so Slippers were made primarily to limit the amount of torque from the motor onto the tyres not to save the diff which is the most ludicrous thing ive heard in a while. Yeah it does help the diff on the way but thats not what the slipper is for in the first place.
Ill go out on a limb and say the primary use for a slipper is to protect the drivetrain and diff.. if you can use it to help keep the wheels on the ground thats great, i personally dont use it for such things, but ive not heard anyone ever say what you just said..
oople is offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 05:20 PM
  #314  
Tech Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
SCIDA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wildomar, CA
Posts: 345
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Why is traction control illegal?

I have not read A ROAR book in awhile, I never thought about it being illegal since no one has built it anyway.

I remember when brushless was illegal.
SCIDA is offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 05:43 PM
  #315  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (35)
 
Jack Smash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 2,981
Trader Rating: 35 (100%+)
Default

Someone built a traction control system for the '93 Worlds in England. Not sure if it was deemed illegal there or after that race. Things would get a whole lot more expensive and complicated if traction control were legalized.
Jack Smash is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.