Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree302Likes

R1 Wurks brushless motors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2019, 03:21 PM
  #1066  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
carkillaii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 808
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Is the New ESC going to be the same size as the LCG?
carkillaii is offline  
Old 08-05-2019, 05:41 PM
  #1067  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 465
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by carkillaii
Is the New ESC going to be the same size as the LCG?
I messaged them about the same thing, its going to be the same size as the Digital 3.

Patrick
XCELL is offline  
Old 08-05-2019, 11:57 PM
  #1068  
Tech Regular
 
LzREngineering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 309
Default

Originally Posted by Carnage9270
I know ROAR fixed this, I thought BRCA was supposed to follow suit.

https://www.liverc.com/news/announce...QkBp38txOMxkuc

Ahhh nm...clarified here...stator lengths were changed and were too short for the European versions...yikes...

https://www.liverc.com/news/announce...Approved_List/
Over here, R1 have been banned from submitting motors for the next 3 years so no way the V21-s can be used as a replacement. I've heard nothing from R1 on this other than they're "working on a solution" but that was before the ROAR announcement.
LzREngineering is offline  
Old 08-06-2019, 10:07 AM
  #1069  
Tech Master
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,298
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by LzREngineering
Over here, R1 have been banned from submitting motors for the next 3 years so no way the V21-s can be used as a replacement. I've heard nothing from R1 on this other than they're "working on a solution" but that was before the ROAR announcement.
Yeah, if the stator lengths changed, that's a ban for sure. Tolerances are built in for things going a little sideways in production runs. In order for a stator to get flagged it has to be a significant change, sucks man.
No9 and silden like this.
Carnage9270 is offline  
Old 08-06-2019, 02:45 PM
  #1070  
Tech Adept
 
Bassbuster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 111
Default

I have found great benefit in running the 1650 in most situations.... a larger flowing track may be better suited for the std rotor, but there is definitely no disadvantage of the 1650 when geared correctly.
Changing the Rotor will not change the alignment
How would you gear the 1650 rotor compared to a stock rotor? How about the 12.3 RPM rotor? I run at Speedworld and wonder if the 1650 might be a good choice for the tighter infield.
Bassbuster is offline  
Old 08-06-2019, 04:27 PM
  #1071  
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
 
tbrymer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,555
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Bassbuster
How would you gear the 1650 rotor compared to a stock rotor? How about the 12.3 RPM rotor? I run at Speedworld and wonder if the 1650 might be a good choice for the tighter infield.
I usually go one tooth bigger with the high torque for an equal track. However, if you are switching to a smaller track you might consider using the same gear ratio. I personally use the high torque on all tracks and then just gear accordingly.
tbrymer is offline  
Old 09-02-2019, 05:03 AM
  #1072  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Delaware
Posts: 430
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

I know someone from R1 has got to be reading this thread, can we please get a updated sensor board? No reason a two race old motor that's never seen over 120 degrees should pop one, it sucks even more when I was the TQ and three other drivers also lost one during the day.
Hopscotch is offline  
Old 09-05-2019, 07:11 PM
  #1073  
Tech Elite
 
ShaunMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Loading...
Posts: 3,421
Default

What kind of deviations are people seeing on v21 motors between endbell and actual measured timing figures?
ShaunMac is offline  
Old 09-05-2019, 07:34 PM
  #1074  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tamarac
Posts: 977
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Hopscotch
I know someone from R1 has got to be reading this thread, can we please get a updated sensor board? No reason a two race old motor that's never seen over 120 degrees should pop one, it sucks even more when I was the TQ and three other drivers also lost one during the day.
I was running a State Race in Florida and also blew a sensor board in my V21. I put in my V16 and did pretty well, but I have blown so many sensor boards at big races that I am done with R1. I do not want to have DNF's at big races. And for the record, I know what I am doing.... I finish on the podium with stiff competition many a time...………….
SouthFloridaApp is offline  
Old 09-05-2019, 07:42 PM
  #1075  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
DARKSIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville-Memphis
Posts: 9,619
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

is the V21 25.5 motor legal?
DARKSIDE is offline  
Old 09-06-2019, 09:34 AM
  #1076  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnny Wishbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,762
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ShaunMac
What kind of deviations are people seeing on v21 motors between endbell and actual measured timing figures?
What are you using to measure your timing? On my Sky motor checker I see anywhere from 1 to 5 degrees variant between the 2.

If your looking for quicker response to technical questions, R1 rarely come on RCTECH, its best to post your questions on the R1 Wurks face book page or contact them directly via e-mail.
Johnny Wishbone is offline  
Old 09-06-2019, 09:41 AM
  #1077  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnny Wishbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,762
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by LzREngineering
Over here, R1 have been banned from submitting motors for the next 3 years so no way the V21-s can be used as a replacement. I've heard nothing from R1 on this other than they're "working on a solution" but that was before the ROAR announcement.
I believe the door was shut on R1 being able to come up with a solution when the 3 year ban was applied. Since they can't submit anything for 3 years they have no way to get a corrected version in the approval process. This is a issue you should bring up with BRCA or whomever your sanctioning body is since its their call for the 3 year ban.
Johnny Wishbone is offline  
Old 09-06-2019, 09:42 AM
  #1078  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnny Wishbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,762
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Bassbuster
How would you gear the 1650 rotor compared to a stock rotor? How about the 12.3 RPM rotor? I run at Speedworld and wonder if the 1650 might be a good choice for the tighter infield.
If your looking for quicker response to technical questions, R1 rarely come on RCTECH, its best to post your questions on the R1 Wurks face book page or contact them directly via e-mail.
Johnny Wishbone is offline  
Old 09-06-2019, 09:49 AM
  #1079  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnny Wishbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,762
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Hopscotch
I know someone from R1 has got to be reading this thread, can we please get a updated sensor board? No reason a two race old motor that's never seen over 120 degrees should pop one, it sucks even more when I was the TQ and three other drivers also lost one during the day.
If your looking for quicker response to technical questions, R1 rarely come on RCTECH, its best to post your questions on the R1 Wurks face book page or contact them directly via e-mail.

They have a pretty good warranty process, you just have to get a RMA off the website.

Did you re-shim the motor, or did you have it apart? If you re-shimmed the rotor and are using teflon shims on the sensor board side I would get rid of them, especially in off road applications, but tank slappers in onroad can have the same issue. The "squish" of the teflon spacers is enough, that if your tight on the sensor board side, it can take out the sensors, even a light scuff will be enough damage to have a board failure.
Hopscotch likes this.
Johnny Wishbone is offline  
Old 09-06-2019, 09:53 AM
  #1080  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnny Wishbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,762
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by SouthFloridaApp
I was running a State Race in Florida and also blew a sensor board in my V21. I put in my V16 and did pretty well, but I have blown so many sensor boards at big races that I am done with R1. I do not want to have DNF's at big races. And for the record, I know what I am doing.... I finish on the podium with stiff competition many a time...………….
Not doubting your motor knowledge but, if you re-shimmed the rotor and are using teflon shims on the sensor board side I would get rid of them, especially in off road applications, but tank slappers in onroad can have the same issue. The "squish" of the teflon spacers is enough, that if your tight on the sensor board side, it can take out the sensors, even a light scuff will be enough damage to have a board failure.
tbrymer likes this.
Johnny Wishbone is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.