Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread
|
|||
Which aluminum servo horn are you guys using? I've seen Losi and Racers Edge mentioned in this thread, but nobody seems to agree and I haven't seen any actual part numbers or links.
Tech Elite
iTrader: (50)
one thing that i noticed on the ball studs is that they are all NOT perfectly round. Some you can see that there is almost a flat ridge in the middle. I don't believe the ball cups are the issue it is more of the ball stud not being completely round. Once you sand and polish the ridges off of them they are bind free.
Tech Regular
iTrader: (22)
one thing that i noticed on the ball studs is that they are all NOT perfectly round. Some you can see that there is almost a flat ridge in the middle. I don't believe the ball cups are the issue it is more of the ball stud not being completely round. Once you sand and polish the ridges off of them they are bind free.
Tech Elite
iTrader: (43)
MM took 1st and second. And both were B5M's. The RM car were much better until the traction came way up. Also, once the track started to rut, having the alum chassis down low helped keep the cars from bouncing all over. There were RM cars in the Amain and in the better drivers won. And they probably would have won with an RM car also.
I know Jeremy (who won) had built a RM a few months ago, ran it probably 15 minutes in practice and sold it. I did the same thing. It may just be a florida thing where everyone hates RM.
The RM may jump a little farther or have more traction when the track is super loose, but in every other area the mid is probably better.
I did not experience that problem. All it took to get rid of the binding was to squeeze the ball cups with a needle nose pliers. I have heard a lot of people say they like the lunsford ones though
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
I ran with the kid who was running the RM during practice when the track was semi-slick and smooth and had no problem staying with him. We mostly just followed each other and tried to lay down some fast laps, I think I hot lapped him by 2 tenths. So I wouldn't say it was the bumps or traction that held it back, I think it's more of a personal preference. There was 7 B5 buggies in the a-main of stock, and only one was a RM.
I know Jeremy (who won) had built a RM a few months ago, ran it probably 15 minutes in practice and sold it. I did the same thing. It may just be a florida thing where everyone hates RM.
The RM may jump a little farther or have more traction when the track is super loose, but in every other area the mid is probably better.
I know Jeremy (who won) had built a RM a few months ago, ran it probably 15 minutes in practice and sold it. I did the same thing. It may just be a florida thing where everyone hates RM.
The RM may jump a little farther or have more traction when the track is super loose, but in every other area the mid is probably better.
Here is the new layout at SRS. I have not seen it yet. Today is the first day it is open to the public. I dont know what the far left and right sides look like.
Tech Addict
iTrader: (17)
I recommend sticking with the stock plastic servo arm if possible - with no servo saver, the servo arm itself is the weakest link in the system and can save the servo a lot of internal damage when the arm breaks. Sure, it may cost you your heat, but it won't cost you $25 for a gear set or $100 for a whole new servo!
Super Moderator
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: RIP 'Chopper', 4/18/13 miss you bud:(
Posts: 15,486
Trader Rating: 31 (100%+)
My kit should be arriving in a few days thanks to all of your input. Thank you very much for that.
I have a question about build/progress/journal posts. Should i do that in this thread or start a new journal thread? I feel like i should start a new thread but i just wanted to check on the "culture" of this forum.
Thanks again!
jB
I have a question about build/progress/journal posts. Should i do that in this thread or start a new journal thread? I feel like i should start a new thread but i just wanted to check on the "culture" of this forum.
Thanks again!
jB
My kit should be arriving in a few days thanks to all of your input. Thank you very much for that.
I have a question about build/progress/journal posts. Should i do that in this thread or start a new journal thread? I feel like i should start a new thread but i just wanted to check on the "culture" of this forum.
Thanks again!
jB[/
Welcoming you to join and share your build ...
I have a question about build/progress/journal posts. Should i do that in this thread or start a new journal thread? I feel like i should start a new thread but i just wanted to check on the "culture" of this forum.
Thanks again!
jB[/
Welcoming you to join and share your build ...
Last edited by racer1812; 08-26-2014 at 08:03 AM.
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
MM took 1st and second. And both were B5M's. The RM car were much better until the traction came way up. Also, once the track started to rut, having the alum chassis down low helped keep the cars from bouncing all over. There were RM cars in the Amain and in the better drivers won. And they probably would have won with an RM car also.
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
Super Moderator
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: RIP 'Chopper', 4/18/13 miss you bud:(
Posts: 15,486
Trader Rating: 31 (100%+)
I recommend sticking with the stock plastic servo arm if possible - with no servo saver, the servo arm itself is the weakest link in the system and can save the servo a lot of internal damage when the arm breaks. Sure, it may cost you your heat, but it won't cost you $25 for a gear set or $100 for a whole new servo!
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
And that is your problem too...you give up on one to fall back on the other...rm's are not even better outdoors on non sugared tracks either. Stick with one, figure it out, listen to the right people, and don't run bone headed set ups either. Over thinking the set up on a B5M will only result in problems.