Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro Off-Road
losi vs king headz engine mount >

losi vs king headz engine mount

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

losi vs king headz engine mount

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2009, 03:28 PM
  #1  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
 
jrwoodchuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Northampton, Massachusettes
Posts: 1,336
Default losi vs king headz engine mount

i'm forced to buy a new buggy (my 808 was scammed out of me) and i'm going to go with a 2.0 buggy, i've had two eights before, but both were the 1.0 version. i used the king headz mount in them so i could use a three shoe clutch, and i'm going to do the same in the 2.0.

i had herd that the losi one peice mount sits high and the starter wheel has trouble hitting the flywheel. is this true?

if so i'll go with the king headz mount again. if not, i'll use the losi one..

thanks

Last edited by jrwoodchuck; 04-15-2009 at 03:45 PM.
jrwoodchuck is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 03:37 PM
  #2  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
 
JAMMINKRAZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 6,575
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by jrwoodchuck
i'm forced to buy a new buggy (my 808 was scammed out of me) and i'm going to go with a 2.0 buggy, i've had two eights before, but both were the 1.0 version. i used the kingz head mount in them so i could use a three shoe clutch, and i'm going to do the same in the 2.0.

i had herd that the losi one peice mount sits high and the starter wheel has trouble hitting the flywheel. is this true?

if so i'll go with the kingz head mount again. if not, i'll use the losi one..

thanks
Not sure about sitting high, but IMO the KHZ mount is alot nicer anyway. I run the extended one on both buggy and truggy, and have for years. The extension really helps with CB bearing life. Plus IMO the KHZ mount is just higher quality, plus ya gotta love the black.
JAMMINKRAZY is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 03:39 PM
  #3  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
 
jrwoodchuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Northampton, Massachusettes
Posts: 1,336
Default

i've never tried the extended mount, i replaced my clutch bearings after every race weekend so i'm not sure about going threw them.
jrwoodchuck is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 03:51 PM
  #4  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
 
jrwoodchuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Northampton, Massachusettes
Posts: 1,336
Default

i'm sure the answer is yes, but will the king headz mount fit the 2.0?
jrwoodchuck is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 03:51 PM
  #5  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
 
JAMMINKRAZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 6,575
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by jrwoodchuck
i've never tried the extended mount, i replaced my clutch bearings after every race weekend so i'm not sure about going threw them.
Yeah I was changing mine every weekend before I got the extended mount. Now they last several gallons if I want them too. I usually change them every gallon or so.
JAMMINKRAZY is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 03:54 PM
  #6  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
 
jrwoodchuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Northampton, Massachusettes
Posts: 1,336
Default

Originally Posted by JAMMINKRAZY
Yeah I was changing mine every weekend before I got the extended mount. Now they last several gallons if I want them too. I usually change them every gallon or so.
wow, that's a great selling point. but do you notice a different feel having the chassis flex less?
jrwoodchuck is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 03:56 PM
  #7  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
 
JAMMINKRAZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 6,575
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by jrwoodchuck
wow, that's a great selling point. but do you notice a different feel having the chassis flex less?
No. I was worried I would at first, but I don't. The extension only cuts down on flex right in the spur/bell area. It has to increase the life of the spur and bell slightly too. IMO it is well worth it.
JAMMINKRAZY is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 04:03 PM
  #8  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
 
jrwoodchuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Northampton, Massachusettes
Posts: 1,336
Default

Originally Posted by JAMMINKRAZY
No. I was worried I would at first, but I don't. The extension only cuts down on flex right in the spur/bell area. It has to increase the life of the spur and bell slightly too. IMO it is well worth it.
i see in your signiture that you are running the 2.0, i'm assumming you are using the extended mount in them. but you sold me anyway...

thanks
jrwoodchuck is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 04:07 PM
  #9  
Tech Master
iTrader: (18)
 
pyromania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: North Hills, CA
Posts: 1,283
Trader Rating: 18 (100%+)
Default

I have the losi quick change in mine and I don't know how or why people are saying its too high. I really like my losi mount, but I'd rather have the King Headz.
pyromania is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 04:25 PM
  #10  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (148)
 
Frank L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
Posts: 12,520
Trader Rating: 148 (100%+)
Default

I have a 2.0 truggy and I installed the Kink Headz extended mount before the truck hit the dirt. I have ran this mount for the last season in a 1.0 truggy and I love it. Keep the plastic braces front and rear and you will have plenty of flex. The alum braces takes a lot of the flex away. Depends on your driving style. I like all the flex I can get but there is no need for flex at the clutch bell it can not tolerate flex for long. I have no problems with the starter box. I have used the losi box and recently the ofna truggy box (best box on the planet). Just my 2 cents.
Frank L is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 04:33 PM
  #11  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (28)
 
wb-racer-ace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 520
Trader Rating: 28 (100%+)
Default

how bout the A.C.E. mount? bosses on the bottom that take up the extra slack of the oversize slots, and aligns the motor straight everytime!!
Attached Thumbnails losi vs king headz engine mount-8ightmount1-600-x-451-.jpg   losi vs king headz engine mount-8ightmount3-600-x-451-.jpg  
wb-racer-ace is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 04:51 PM
  #12  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (19)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Erie Pa.
Posts: 3,323
Trader Rating: 19 (100%+)
Default

I vote for A.C.E
malik is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 06:01 PM
  #13  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
 
JAMMINKRAZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 6,575
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by jrwoodchuck
i see in your signiture that you are running the 2.0, i'm assumming you are using the extended mount in them. but you sold me anyway...

thanks
Yup I run them on the 2.0 with great success. The KHZ mount is the only one worth having IMO. That extension really helps out. And like Frank L said you don't want flex in the CB area.
JAMMINKRAZY is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.