Team Corally RDX Touring Car
#7786
Looks like Jeff Brown is doing really well with the car in Calif. this weekend at the nationals. Anyone know what he has done to the setup for the weekend?
Quick question about shocks:
Are people using the factory ones or switching to Tamiya?
Quick question about shocks:
Are people using the factory ones or switching to Tamiya?
#7787
Think most people stick with factory ones although alot are using Tamiya 3hole pistons in them They need alittle shimming to space them on the shaft but are a perfect diameter inside
#7788
At the Reedy Race we were using Tamiya 3 hole pistons and taking out bottom o-ring and replacing with a .090 plastic spacer to fill gap. Makes the shock smoother.
#7789
Tech Lord
iTrader: (32)
Have you guys ever had trouble with inconsistent rear toe on the car? I've got a single 1 degree spacer in the rear of the car on each side (for 1 degree of rear toe) but one of the sides is showing 2 degrees on the setup station. The chassis is brand new, and I checked the bulkheads on a flat surface and can't detect any kind of bend or anything. The rear uprights are both 0 degrees (at least there's no stamp on them) so I don't think I'm running outboard toe by accident. I'm perplexed though. Is it possible one of the uprights is drilled wrong? I suppose I could measure the holes in the chassis, and possibly swap things around to see if the problem follows a particular part.
This is a car I bought used so I didn't have to touch my foam car while our track insists on us running these ridiculous rubber tires for the summer. I really think this car is haunted, it's been nothing but trouble. Maybe that's why it was for sale. :-( I might just convert the foam car to rubber so at least I know what I'm working with. I'm about ready to melt this rubber car down for spare parts. Piece of crap.
This is a car I bought used so I didn't have to touch my foam car while our track insists on us running these ridiculous rubber tires for the summer. I really think this car is haunted, it's been nothing but trouble. Maybe that's why it was for sale. :-( I might just convert the foam car to rubber so at least I know what I'm working with. I'm about ready to melt this rubber car down for spare parts. Piece of crap.
#7790
Originally Posted by syndr0me
Have you guys ever had trouble with inconsistent rear toe on the car? I've got a single 1 degree spacer in the rear of the car on each side (for 1 degree of rear toe) but one of the sides is showing 2 degrees on the setup station. The chassis is brand new, and I checked the bulkheads on a flat surface and can't detect any kind of bend or anything. The rear uprights are both 0 degrees (at least there's no stamp on them) so I don't think I'm running outboard toe by accident. I'm perplexed though. Is it possible one of the uprights is drilled wrong? I suppose I could measure the holes in the chassis, and possibly swap things around to see if the problem follows a particular part.
This is a car I bought used so I didn't have to touch my foam car while our track insists on us running these ridiculous rubber tires for the summer. I really think this car is haunted, it's been nothing but trouble. Maybe that's why it was for sale. :-( I might just convert the foam car to rubber so at least I know what I'm working with. I'm about ready to melt this rubber car down for spare parts. Piece of crap.
This is a car I bought used so I didn't have to touch my foam car while our track insists on us running these ridiculous rubber tires for the summer. I really think this car is haunted, it's been nothing but trouble. Maybe that's why it was for sale. :-( I might just convert the foam car to rubber so at least I know what I'm working with. I'm about ready to melt this rubber car down for spare parts. Piece of crap.
Greetings Ollie
#7791
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
Have you guys ever had trouble with inconsistent rear toe on the car? I've got a single 1 degree spacer in the rear of the car on each side (for 1 degree of rear toe) but one of the sides is showing 2 degrees on the setup station. The chassis is brand new, and I checked the bulkheads on a flat surface and can't detect any kind of bend or anything. The rear uprights are both 0 degrees (at least there's no stamp on them) so I don't think I'm running outboard toe by accident. I'm perplexed though. Is it possible one of the uprights is drilled wrong? I suppose I could measure the holes in the chassis, and possibly swap things around to see if the problem follows a particular part.
This is a car I bought used so I didn't have to touch my foam car while our track insists on us running these ridiculous rubber tires for the summer. I really think this car is haunted, it's been nothing but trouble. Maybe that's why it was for sale. :-( I might just convert the foam car to rubber so at least I know what I'm working with. I'm about ready to melt this rubber car down for spare parts. Piece of crap.
This is a car I bought used so I didn't have to touch my foam car while our track insists on us running these ridiculous rubber tires for the summer. I really think this car is haunted, it's been nothing but trouble. Maybe that's why it was for sale. :-( I might just convert the foam car to rubber so at least I know what I'm working with. I'm about ready to melt this rubber car down for spare parts. Piece of crap.
#7792
Could it be the result of slop in suspension. Check and shim the car.
#7794
Tech Lord
iTrader: (32)
I noticed on his carpet nats setup that Tosolini used the 2.4mm topdeck with the 3.9mm chassis. Everything I've learned about carpet setups seems to indicate that you want to make the car as stiff as possible, especially when the traction comes up, like at a big race. What would be the advantage (or reason) for putting the thin topdeck on in a situation like that?
Or, was that just a typo?
Or, was that just a typo?
#7795
Originally Posted by syndr0me
I noticed on his carpet nats setup that Tosolini used the 2.4mm topdeck with the 3.9mm chassis. Everything I've learned about carpet setups seems to indicate that you want to make the car as stiff as possible, especially when the traction comes up, like at a big race. What would be the advantage (or reason) for putting the thin topdeck on in a situation like that?
Or, was that just a typo?
Or, was that just a typo?
On rubber you have to do the other thats 2.4mm chassi and 2.9 topdeck thats for rubber on Carpet!
#7798
Tech Lord
iTrader: (32)
Originally Posted by Ollie RDX
The 3.9mm chassis is for direct steer and allot of steer and the 2.4mm topdeck is for the back to be stabile!
On rubber you have to do the other thats 2.4mm chassi and 2.9 topdeck thats for rubber on Carpet!
On rubber you have to do the other thats 2.4mm chassi and 2.9 topdeck thats for rubber on Carpet!
#7800
Tech Champion
iTrader: (13)
Originally Posted by syndr0me
I noticed on his carpet nats setup that Tosolini used the 2.4mm topdeck with the 3.9mm chassis. Everything I've learned about carpet setups seems to indicate that you want to make the car as stiff as possible, especially when the traction comes up, like at a big race. What would be the advantage (or reason) for putting the thin topdeck on in a situation like that?
Or, was that just a typo?
Or, was that just a typo?
-Korey