Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Cavalieri running mid motor? >

Cavalieri running mid motor?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Cavalieri running mid motor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2013, 08:08 AM
  #31  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by asc6000
Great company, great products but perhaps the word "pioneered" has a better alternative. Euro based mid motored cars have been around forever it seems like. Even here in the US we ran mid motor gold tub rc10's in the 80's.

True - but it wasn't like we were really able to get them to work back then (because the wheelbases were so short and the weight of the nicads pushed the weight bias too far forward), and we didn't run much carpet offroad back then either whereas the Euros were always seeking alternative surfaces because of their weather. I also thing bragging about national titles over there is a bit over the top too, as it's comparable to state championship over here in most cases. I also think they'd be a big bugged if anyone threadjacked their threads with info on a competitor's car.
Then again the whole idea of "catching up" has really only been brought on since the advent and use of lightweight lipo batteries, which allows for better and easier pinpoint weight distribution, and more running of higher traction surfaces.
If their cars were really that good, and no offense intended, then it seems as if the Dirtinator would have garnered some more titles while he was running for them.

But we're getting off-topic ......... let's get back to the AE/CML Centro C4.1
pablo040 is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 11:15 AM
  #32  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: iowa
Posts: 470
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Im trying to figure out why the two top guys for x factory felt they needed to chime in on this tread when they have there own they must be worried (lol)
blingy is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 11:50 AM
  #33  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
samuelsonmark71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,476
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Well saying I started the thread...
samuelsonmark71 is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 12:12 PM
  #34  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: iowa
Posts: 470
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Not trying to ruffle feathers sorry
blingy is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 12:15 PM
  #35  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
samuelsonmark71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,476
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

All good, just glad to see that there is interest in the general public about mid motor now
samuelsonmark71 is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 01:50 PM
  #36  
R/C Tech Elite Member
 
JayL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ca
Posts: 3,111
Default

If they ran mid-motor at the nats, would you not have to be able to put a full size lipo in the car before you run, per ROAR rules?
JayL is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 02:03 PM
  #37  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by JayL
If they ran mid-motor at the nats, would you not have to be able to put a full size lipo in the car before you run, per ROAR rules?
Saddle packs are legal in other classes, so why not offroad?
But since a saddle pack, while taking up roughly the same front-to-rear space as a shorty pack, being the same overall length of a full-size pack they'd be legal as per ROAR rules.
pablo040 is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 04:35 PM
  #38  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
gee-dub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Fontana, CA
Posts: 776
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by pablo040
...so why not offroad? ...
I recall reading somewhere that the rules were implemented to deter development of battery-specific vehicles/chassis by maintaining support of standardized component sizes.
gee-dub is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 04:49 PM
  #39  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,766
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

I think it's only a matter of time before ROAR realizes the stupidity of that rule. Pretty soon everyone will be running shorty packs. How many still use nicad or nimh at their races? I'll bet none or at least no one competitive. While stifle future car design and innovation for a fading battery style?
fredswain is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 04:55 PM
  #40  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,766
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

I also wouldn't go too hard on X-Factory for coming in here promoting their car. Cavalleri is running a Centro kit while is a mid motor conversion for the B4. It is either not available here or very tough to get here. The X6 however is available here and it too is a mid motor B4. It is a solution. People get too caught up on what some pro uses and somehow feel that copying them is the guaranteed recipe to success. It isn't. I even encourage people not to copy their setup sheets since they are so irrelevant.
fredswain is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 05:17 PM
  #41  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by gee-dub
I recall reading somewhere that the rules were implemented to deter development of battery-specific vehicles/chassis by maintaining support of standardized component sizes.
I think I read the same thing, though I always thought it kind of dumb being as saddle packs are "vehicle specific" in they're really only been used in pan cars and a very few offroad cars.

Originally Posted by fredswain
I think it's only a matter of time before ROAR realizes the stupidity of that rule. Pretty soon everyone will be running shorty packs. How many still use nicad or nimh at their races? I'll bet none or at least no one competitive. While stifle future car design and innovation for a fading battery style?
I agree, and I hope they address it soon. Always thought it was pretty ridiculous. And considering my buggy only uses roughly 1400mAh during the course of a 6-minute race, it seems rather pointless needing to have a big ol' 5800mAh (or larger) 6-cell sized pack just so I can be legal.
pablo040 is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 05:20 PM
  #42  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (6)
 
Matt Howard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Abilene TX
Posts: 5,955
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by fredswain
I think it's only a matter of time before ROAR realizes the stupidity of that rule. Pretty soon everyone will be running shorty packs. How many still use nicad or nimh at their races? I'll bet none or at least no one competitive. While stifle future car design and innovation for a fading battery style?
the rule wasn't implemented to deter shorty packs, it was made to deter companies from designing a car around an odd size battery. Example would be a company making a car that only accepted a pack size that only they made so you had to buy the pack from them. Now that shorties are more common I would hope the rule would be updated so say something along the lines of "only ROAR approved packs" can be used or something to that affect.
Matt Howard is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 05:34 PM
  #43  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (170)
 
Matt Trimmings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 6,272
Trader Rating: 170 (100%+)
Default

saddle packs are considered a full size battery...if it can fit a saddle its good to go
Matt Trimmings is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 06:53 PM
  #44  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
fatbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 814
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by pablo040


If their cars were really that good, and no offense intended, then it seems as if the Dirtinator would have garnered some more titles while he was running for them.
Have a look at Brian Kinwalds results while he was running for X-Factory compared to his results now running for Associated.
I think you will find in 2WD Mod at big races that he was consistently well placed in the A-Main with the X-Factory but with the Associated he is no where to be seen.
I guarantee if the big drivers put some real time into the mid motor cars you would not see many rear motored cars any more.
fatbear is offline  
Old 04-04-2013, 09:27 PM
  #45  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (86)
 
mblgjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: AL
Posts: 2,179
Trader Rating: 86 (100%+)
Default

^ I would also contribute that to BK's affinity to run indoor high bite grooved tracks. Where mid motor is more of a benefit.
mblgjr is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.