Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
17.5 Blinky, too fast for beginners? >

17.5 Blinky, too fast for beginners?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

17.5 Blinky, too fast for beginners?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2014, 05:29 PM
  #46  
Tech Master
iTrader: (11)
 
b20btec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sugar Land
Posts: 1,188
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

I run 17.5 locally (no slower sedan classes was offered at the time) but raced VTA and USGT during our texas events. Won those classes and eventually moved up to 17.5 at the events after developing my driving and setup. A properly setup car makes racing more fun, consistent, and competitive.

The thing is when I started winning and running up front I moved away from the slower class after the season was over. I believe doing so will hopefully provide more growth for others running those classes instead of blowing them out everytime I race. Gives them a chance to run and front and be competitive amongst each other. Now I'm running 17.5 again my level is mid pack and I can work may way up hopefully.
b20btec is offline  
Old 11-12-2014, 05:35 PM
  #47  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Xpress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Land of high taxes and bad football
Posts: 1,807
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by bd581
In Australia we run 21.5T blinky, 13.5T blinky and Mod.
+1
Xpress is offline  
Old 11-12-2014, 05:56 PM
  #48  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
DesertRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sniffin the 'Sauce Fumes
Posts: 4,105
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

I disagree with the assertion that 17.5 is too fast for a beginner. Its too fast if they want to treat the throttle like a switch, or just drive with it pinned wide open and steer like a video game, but it is not that fast. People forget how fast we went on cells and brushed motors.

On road racing is less popular than offroad for three reasons. 1, it is hard, you can literally make your car undrivable through poor tuning. 2, you can only drive on road on a prepared or semi-prepared surface, no bashing in the ditch and throwing dirt around the back yard. And 3, we lack the novelty of having 5-10 semi- controlled crashes a lap known as jumps. That's why. Its hard, lacks novelty, and no backyard bashing. I know, I raced offroad for years before I ever drove a road car.
DesertRat is offline  
Old 11-12-2014, 06:12 PM
  #49  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,059
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DOTHOPPER
Rather than changing motors why not just have the rookie class run a set gearing to keep them slow.
Because top speed is not the issue limited gearing only makes the issue (too much initial acceleration) worse.

Keep in mind beginners have little issue driving a 2 sp pull start nitro car that is capable of 60-70km/hr out of the box but hand the same person a high torque 17.5T TC and they will struggle and frequently crash.
frozenpod is offline  
Old 11-12-2014, 06:25 PM
  #50  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
robk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 8,201
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Reading this thread is illuminating. A bunch of "man up" responses, a few who only see to the end of their pit table, and some suggestions of what has worked for them.

I have been doing this a long time, and the only constant is the cars getting faster. 17.5 is too fast for the average new person.

I won't even try to answer what solution is needed. I do know when cars were slower there were more participants, and that goes from modified to 27t stock motors.
robk is offline  
Old 11-12-2014, 06:32 PM
  #51  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: GP
Posts: 373
Default

Originally Posted by robk
Reading this thread is illuminating. A bunch of "man up" responses, a few who only see to the end of their pit table, and some suggestions of what has worked for them.

I have been doing this a long time, and the only constant is the cars getting faster. 17.5 is too fast for the average new person.

I won't even try to answer what solution is needed. I do know when cars were slower there were more participants, and that goes from modified to 27t stock motors.
Yep
HawaiiBob is offline  
Old 11-12-2014, 06:50 PM
  #52  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,136
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Back in the day we raced because cars were fast and it was fun... Now people only want to race if the cars are so slow that anyone can drive them? Times have changed I guess.... Used to be racers filled with desire to be good rather than creating more classes that are so slow anyone can drive them.
Racermac73 is offline  
Old 11-12-2014, 06:54 PM
  #53  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dark side of the moon
Posts: 131
Default

Originally Posted by robk
Reading this thread is illuminating. A bunch of "man up" responses, a few who only see to the end of their pit table, and some suggestions of what has worked for them.

I have been doing this a long time, and the only constant is the cars getting faster. 17.5 is too fast for the average new person.

I won't even try to answer what solution is needed. I do know when cars were slower there were more participants, and that goes from modified to 27t stock motors.
+1
trackout is offline  
Old 11-12-2014, 07:05 PM
  #54  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
robk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 8,201
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Racermac73
Back in the day we raced because cars were fast and it was fun... Now people only want to race if the cars are so slow that anyone can drive them? Times have changed I guess.... Used to be racers filled with desire to be good rather than creating more classes that are so slow anyone can drive them.
Go watch youtube videos of races from the 90's. The cars were slow. Cars are now frighteningly fast in the case of mod. 17.5 is easily as fast as a 19t motor on 4200 NiMHs. Realize we are using batteries @8.4v nominal, that finish at like 7.8v most of the time. I used to rate batteries on a turbo 30 by seeing how long they could hold 7v. Batteries always finished somewhere in the 6v range.

Essentially, we changed over to 7 cell racing.
robk is offline  
Old 11-12-2014, 07:07 PM
  #55  
Tech Addict
 
bd581's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, NSW
Posts: 623
Default

Originally Posted by Racermac73
Back in the day we raced because cars were fast and it was fun... Now people only want to race if the cars are so slow that anyone can drive them? Times have changed I guess.... Used to be racers filled with desire to be good rather than creating more classes that are so slow anyone can drive them.
I don't think its about creating more classes, it's about creating more racers.
bd581 is offline  
Old 11-12-2014, 07:22 PM
  #56  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 2,567
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by HB Moose
What can we do as a hobby to make it less intimidating to race on-road? A decent 17.5 motor running in blinky mode can be a handful for a unskilled or beginning driver. It sure seem my cars are running way faster with brushless stock now than they were running 27 turn brushed motors a few years ago.

What would it take to make 21.5 turn brushless the entry level? Even an older driver with decreasing reactions doesn’t always need to run the fastest class. Currently we have a couple of the SoCal tracks running GT10 classes that are Stock Sedan with different bodies and spoked wheels. The speeds and setup are pretty much the same as Stock.

Anyone else out there think a 21.5 GT class could work? VTA cars welcome too. Basically just a 21.5 blinky class. All skill levels welcome but a slightly slower race.
In my opinion, it's not just the motors. It's also the tires (at least on carpet, maybe not so much on asphalt), the light weight, and to a lesser degree the bodies. The cars get out of shape because the rookie drivers can't keep up with the lightning response (especially if they have a lower-end radio and servo). Then the too-fast motor just magnifies the issue. Our club has loaner cars, that are a super-duper low-end Tamiyas (TT01 I think) with our Spec TC tire and Mazdaspeed 6 bodies. Probably low-end steering servos, too. They look absolutely painful on track, even with silver can motors, because the chassis can't even begin to deal with the grip and response generated by those tires.

Originally Posted by PutAwayWet
We've had great success growing new racers in Seattle. On the TC side, we offer the tandem of Stock (17.5/blinky) and Mod. But our foundation class is Scale Spec, a VTA/USGT combo. Deep fields every race meeting, a fine mix of newbs and established talent, and good times across the board. I'll emphasize it's not a Novice class. We offer Novice most nights as well. But Scale Spec is where our new racers make their bones.

Scale Spec: 1/10th scale electric chassis. 5mm minimum ride height. Tamiya 540 silver can motor or Novak SS Pro 25.5t (PN: 3425V), Ballistic 25.5t (PN: 3625V), and Ballistic Boss VTA Edition (PN: 3626V) brushless motors. 12.3mm rotors only. No restriction on endbell timing. ROAR-approved Non-Timing ESC for brushless motors. HPI D Compound tires. Realistic, scale bodies must be run on all chassis. VTA bodies may run included rear-deck spoilers. GT bodies may run included wings, or option wing sets that emphasize scale appearance. Maximum 6-cell NiMH or NiCd batteries or maximum 7.4v 2S lithium technology batteries. Lithium technology batteries must be in hard case. 4wd: 1450g minimum weight. FWD: No minimum weight. M-Chassis: No minimum weight. Open tire on Mini rims. The spirit of Scale Spec is reasonable cost, scale-appearance, even, competitive racing. Scale livery is encouraged. Drivers are encouraged to operate both within the letter and spirit of the rules.
<3 the Scale Spec. It's a great spec. Slow enough for the entry level racer to approach, fast enough to keep people learning for years, and diverse enough to let each racer fulfill their aesthetic desires.

Moose, when you visited Seattle last year (or very early this year, I can't remember), I loaned you my Scale Spec car for a race night at the Hanger. I'm pretty sure you enjoyed yourself.

-Mike
grippgoat is offline  
Old 11-12-2014, 07:54 PM
  #57  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (115)
 
nf_ekt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue
Posts: 4,647
Trader Rating: 115 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DesertRat
I disagree with the assertion that 17.5 is too fast for a beginner. Its too fast if they want to treat the throttle like a switch, or just drive with it pinned wide open and steer like a video game, but it is not that fast. People forget how fast we went on cells and brushed motors.

On road racing is less popular than offroad for three reasons. 1, it is hard, you can literally make your car undrivable through poor tuning. 2, you can only drive on road on a prepared or semi-prepared surface, no bashing in the ditch and throwing dirt around the back yard. And 3, we lack the novelty of having 5-10 semi- controlled crashes a lap known as jumps. That's why. Its hard, lacks novelty, and no backyard bashing. I know, I raced offroad for years before I ever drove a road car.
I'd mostly agree, and yeah, I raced off-road long before ever touching an on-road car. So I see your point.

It's (off vs. on-road) not much different than Supercross vs. Superbike. Off-road is just more popular.. has nothing to do with attitudes.

17.5 is too fast for a guy that has never wheeled a car at all. Beyond that, yeah speeds are up these days, but so are the quality of the cars we are strapping the motors into. Modern cars put the power down and stay stable to a much higher degree.

Legends- hey, thumbs up. Cheap and mad easy to wheel with foam tires and very low HP. Not a bad choice for any club. I've been watching them run lately and might even build one myself to run with the locals...
nf_ekt is offline  
Old 11-12-2014, 07:55 PM
  #58  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (14)
 
geeunit1014's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,827
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DesertRat
I disagree with the assertion that 17.5 is too fast for a beginner. Its too fast if they want to treat the throttle like a switch, or just drive with it pinned wide open and steer like a video game, but it is not that fast. People forget how fast we went on cells and brushed
At port jervis this summer, we clocked 17.5 blinky at 40mph. We were not going 40mph on 27t and cells. Maybe not even 19t. 17 5 is too fast. Stock should be 25.5, and 17.5 the middle class.
Anybody have dyno slips from brushed motors? A 27t was what, 40-50 watts or something like that? A good 17.5 is 150+ watts now.

Watch this vid. This is 19t back in the day. Thats maybe 17.5 speed now. The cars have gotten much faster, but all the racers have gotten better over time as well and dont realize how much...
+ YouTube Video
ERROR: If you can see this, then YouTube is down or you don't have Flash installed.
geeunit1014 is offline  
Old 11-12-2014, 07:59 PM
  #59  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (115)
 
nf_ekt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue
Posts: 4,647
Trader Rating: 115 (100%+)
Default

I'll hook that up...

+ YouTube Video
ERROR: If you can see this, then YouTube is down or you don't have Flash installed.
nf_ekt is offline  
Old 11-12-2014, 08:18 PM
  #60  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
 
JLock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,520
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by bd581
I don't think its about creating more classes, it's about creating more racers.
This post sums up this whole thread the best!!! Some of the ones that are now the "experts" and "pros" have forgotten the days when they were the newbie and guys with the attitudes like they have now were the ones complaining about the slow, erratic new racers in the way, messing up laps times and podium finishes. How soon some forget..........
JLock is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.