FORGET NiMH/LiIon/LiPo/LiMn - H-Cells are the future!
#16
Guys...the car in the pictures and video is setup with a Mabushi motor. Gearing on the car could also be very conservative, hence the reason for such a slow speed. You put a really good stock motor an perhaps better gear ratio than stock, you get better perhaps more realistic results.
Last edited by svt-racer; 04-12-2007 at 08:46 PM.
#20
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bristol, England, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,857
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
I'd LOVE to see one flip though. BOOOMMM! bits of canister everywhere. give it 10 years it might be better though. hell, you could put propane in the tanks instead mwuhahaha. (or just strap a firework to the body shell)
#21
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bristol, England, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,857
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
oh yeah what they dont mension is that you need electricity to make the hydrogen (electrolysis)
#22
Tech Regular
Saw this about a year ago. It won't source enough current to run a decent motor.
The notion that this is "clean energy" is not exactly correct. It does take power to make the hydrogen (there is more than one way) and a large percentage of our power comes from coal.
I think that if you consider milliwatt hours in vs. milliwatt hours out both NiMh and LiPo outperform anything else that we can get at the moment. Add the more efficient BL motors and we're actually pretty good.
The notion that this is "clean energy" is not exactly correct. It does take power to make the hydrogen (there is more than one way) and a large percentage of our power comes from coal.
I think that if you consider milliwatt hours in vs. milliwatt hours out both NiMh and LiPo outperform anything else that we can get at the moment. Add the more efficient BL motors and we're actually pretty good.
#23
Yes, it does take electricity to make the hydrogen. However it takes energy to produce gasoline from crude oil as well. The point to Hydrogen technology though is that it takes LESS energy to make hydrogen than it does to produce gas. So in comparison it is "green".
Actually, if you look at their other products they have a solar powered Hydrogen refuling station. So, that would make it substantially more "green".
Actually, if you look at their other products they have a solar powered Hydrogen refuling station. So, that would make it substantially more "green".
#24
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bristol, England, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,857
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Originally Posted by dr_hfuhuhurr
Yes, it does take electricity to make the hydrogen. However it takes energy to produce gasoline from crude oil as well. The point to Hydrogen technology though is that it takes LESS energy to make hydrogen than it does to produce gas. So in comparison it is "green".
Actually, if you look at their other products they have a solar powered Hydrogen refuling station. So, that would make it substantially more "green".
Actually, if you look at their other products they have a solar powered Hydrogen refuling station. So, that would make it substantially more "green".
dont get me wrong though its a great idea.
#25
Uh.....I don't like it
#26
Come on guys,
are all on road guys haters or anything new or different.
I really don't know what this thing is, resembles back to the future. if it is a fuel cell powerd car you would only need some hydrogen cannisters to recharge it. keep in mind that this is how all our space vehicles are powered.
the hydrogen passes thru a screen and produces electricity and h20 (water)
probably just enough to make the track slippery for the guy directly behind. But i'm sure there are ways to recycle the water back into the system.
I enjoy new technology, and like the concept of this car BUT I
Hate the conversion cost$$$$
are all on road guys haters or anything new or different.
I really don't know what this thing is, resembles back to the future. if it is a fuel cell powerd car you would only need some hydrogen cannisters to recharge it. keep in mind that this is how all our space vehicles are powered.
the hydrogen passes thru a screen and produces electricity and h20 (water)
probably just enough to make the track slippery for the guy directly behind. But i'm sure there are ways to recycle the water back into the system.
I enjoy new technology, and like the concept of this car BUT I
Hate the conversion cost$$$$
#27
Tech Elite
iTrader: (12)
Originally Posted by dr_hfuhuhurr
Yes, it does take electricity to make the hydrogen. However it takes energy to produce gasoline from crude oil as well. The point to Hydrogen technology though is that it takes LESS energy to make hydrogen than it does to produce gas. So in comparison it is "green".
Actually, if you look at their other products they have a solar powered Hydrogen refuling station. So, that would make it substantially more "green".
Actually, if you look at their other products they have a solar powered Hydrogen refuling station. So, that would make it substantially more "green".
#28
I think they may be onto something...bio fuels are a MUCH better alternative. Still producing gas (and therefore all the emissions) and it's more expensive to produce than crude based products. The only way it's a viable option is with the massive government subsidies.
Yeah...the biggest hurdles to changing the way the US drives will be:
1. Ignorance
2. Convincing people they don't need 380 horses
3. Ignorance
4. Convincing people they don't need a Hummer (also known as ignorance)
5. Ignorance
Don't know who said but, "can't fix stupid."
Yeah...the biggest hurdles to changing the way the US drives will be:
1. Ignorance
2. Convincing people they don't need 380 horses
3. Ignorance
4. Convincing people they don't need a Hummer (also known as ignorance)
5. Ignorance
Don't know who said but, "can't fix stupid."
#29
Originally Posted by Jack Rimer
I think Al Gore ordered 10 of them. One for each of his houses.
#30
Originally Posted by dr_hfuhuhurr
...Yeah...the biggest hurdles to changing the way the US drives will be:
...
2. Convincing people they don't need 380 horses
...
...
2. Convincing people they don't need 380 horses
...