phat-boy what a joke!!!!
10-26-2010, 10:57 PM
#76
The reason they don't do "blanket bans" has been discussed ad-nauseum. If you don't understand (or choose not to understand) that the great great great majority of internet users don't have static IP's then that's on you.
That said, some folks seem to be MAGNETS for "bad deals". Like, say, a couple of the folks discussing this deal here. It's almost like they go looking for them. I think I can count on two fingers the number of "bad deals" I've had in something like 250-ish total transactions on RC Tech, and neither of those deals was fatally flawed. Guess it's the water.
10-26-2010, 11:08 PM
#77
"7. NO spam or advertising other sites, only forum sponsors have that privledge, all others will have their posts deleted."
Not that anyone would actually SEE it, mind you, but just curious if what's good for the goose might not, indeed, be good for the gander.
10-26-2010, 11:37 PM
#78
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
So if I was to join your forum and put "http://www.rctech.net/forum/" in MY signature would I be in violation of your rule #7:
"7. NO spam or advertising other sites, only forum sponsors have that privledge, all others will have their posts deleted."
Not that anyone would actually SEE it, mind you, but just curious if what's good for the goose might not, indeed, be good for the gander.
"7. NO spam or advertising other sites, only forum sponsors have that privledge, all others will have their posts deleted."
Not that anyone would actually SEE it, mind you, but just curious if what's good for the goose might not, indeed, be good for the gander.
any other questions feel free to ask and i will be glad to answer them
by the way glad you brought it up i was meanign to take another look at the rules and make some changes and now i know i need to reword rule number 7, thanks bro i appreciate it.
10-26-2010, 11:39 PM
#79
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
So why do ya'll keep coming back, day after day, if it sucks so badly? No one is barring the door--you're free to leave any ol' time you please.
The reason they don't do "blanket bans" has been discussed ad-nauseum. If you don't understand (or choose not to understand) that the great great great majority of internet users don't have static IP's then that's on you.
That said, some folks seem to be MAGNETS for "bad deals". Like, say, a couple of the folks discussing this deal here. It's almost like they go looking for them. I think I can count on two fingers the number of "bad deals" I've had in something like 250-ish total transactions on RC Tech, and neither of those deals was fatally flawed. Guess it's the water.
The reason they don't do "blanket bans" has been discussed ad-nauseum. If you don't understand (or choose not to understand) that the great great great majority of internet users don't have static IP's then that's on you.
That said, some folks seem to be MAGNETS for "bad deals". Like, say, a couple of the folks discussing this deal here. It's almost like they go looking for them. I think I can count on two fingers the number of "bad deals" I've had in something like 250-ish total transactions on RC Tech, and neither of those deals was fatally flawed. Guess it's the water.
10-27-2010, 12:05 PM
#80
suggestion
maybe in future (i know i will), take a picture of the item, nice close ups, all 6 sides, and email the buyer and if he agrees to it, then ship.
If the buyer receives it and any issues they need to take a picture that day (verfied by newspaper dating) and then contact the seller.
Anything damaged through shipping would be claimed through the shipping company.
No pics from buyer we can only draw one conclusion ...
If the buyer receives it and any issues they need to take a picture that day (verfied by newspaper dating) and then contact the seller.
Anything damaged through shipping would be claimed through the shipping company.
No pics from buyer we can only draw one conclusion ...
10-27-2010, 02:10 PM
#81
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
maybe in future (i know i will), take a picture of the item, nice close ups, all 6 sides, and email the buyer and if he agrees to it, then ship.
If the buyer receives it and any issues they need to take a picture that day (verfied by newspaper dating) and then contact the seller.
Anything damaged through shipping would be claimed through the shipping company.
No pics from buyer we can only draw one conclusion ...
If the buyer receives it and any issues they need to take a picture that day (verfied by newspaper dating) and then contact the seller.
Anything damaged through shipping would be claimed through the shipping company.
No pics from buyer we can only draw one conclusion ...
10-27-2010, 02:26 PM
#82
all is good guys, was just pissed he tryed to open dispute for a brand new transponder. mainly was worried about my freinds paypal account, could really careless about this guy! doubt mods will delete my negitive feeback, oh well! dont really care!!! all i know is im not a scammer and not out to give anyone a bad deal!!!!!! anybody that has not made a deal with me please dont judge me by my feedback! as i concider myself a pretty good guy!!!!!!
10-29-2010, 10:42 AM
#83
all is good guys, was just pissed he tryed to open dispute for a brand new transponder. mainly was worried about my freinds paypal account, could really careless about this guy! doubt mods will delete my negitive feeback, oh well! dont really care!!! all i know is im not a scammer and not out to give anyone a bad deal!!!!!! anybody that has not made a deal with me please dont judge me by my feedback! as i concider myself a pretty good guy!!!!!!
10-31-2010, 02:11 PM
#84
I can't believe some of you are defending inferno, this guy has a clear history of bad transactions. Some sites I go to have a 3 and out rule, no matter what your feedback is if you have 3 negatives you are gone. Even just 1 bad transaction is a red flag IMO.
inferno13 is trying to pull crap yet again.
inferno13 is trying to pull crap yet again.
10-31-2010, 02:34 PM
#85
I can't believe some of you are defending inferno, this guy has a clear history of bad transactions. Some sites I go to have a 3 and out rule, no matter what your feedback is if you have 3 negatives you are gone. Even just 1 bad transaction is a red flag IMO.
inferno13 is trying to pull crap yet again.
inferno13 is trying to pull crap yet again.
10-31-2010, 02:48 PM
#86
http://www.rctech.net/forum/trader-f...nothing-2.html
The guy is crafty, that's for sure.
10-31-2010, 03:32 PM
#87
Here's another thread that discusses inferno.
http://www.rctech.net/forum/trader-f...nothing-2.html
The guy is crafty, that's for sure.
http://www.rctech.net/forum/trader-f...nothing-2.html
The guy is crafty, that's for sure.
10-31-2010, 04:56 PM
#89
Here's another thread that discusses inferno.
http://www.rctech.net/forum/trader-f...nothing-2.html
The guy is crafty, that's for sure.
http://www.rctech.net/forum/trader-f...nothing-2.html
The guy is crafty, that's for sure.
10-31-2010, 05:27 PM
#90
I find it funny people support one scammer but then are quick to judge someone else. Somebody gets ripped off, and this guy convinces you it was the buyer's fault? 
It's clear the OP is pulling wool over people's eyes, at least to me and a few other older members.
It's clear the OP is pulling wool over people's eyes, at least to me and a few other older members.