New TEAM WAVE racing brushless system
#1246
Tech Champion
iTrader: (1)
Thanks TEAMWAVE for the quick response.
I have tried holding down the button for longer. No LEDs light up.
Looks like it could be a faulty button.
Is this a common problem?
Is it possible to fix?
Do you have a repair service in the UK and how much would it cost?
Sorry about all the questions. It would be a shame to bin it if it's only a button problem. I would like to use it if possible, the new firmware sounds great!
Thanks again, Frank
I have tried holding down the button for longer. No LEDs light up.
Looks like it could be a faulty button.
Is this a common problem?
Is it possible to fix?
Do you have a repair service in the UK and how much would it cost?
Sorry about all the questions. It would be a shame to bin it if it's only a button problem. I would like to use it if possible, the new firmware sounds great!
Thanks again, Frank
#1247
New Firmware
Any update on when the new firmware will be available to the public?
#1248
Tech Rookie
Sorry I didn't mention it. Thanks for the help anyway. It's going back to Muchmore UK for investigation.
Cheers, Frank
#1249
Come on guys give us teamwave followers some kind of idea what`s going on with this firmware we just would like to know when we could expect to keep up with others
Cheers guys
Cheers guys
#1251
#1253
#1254
Tech Champion
iTrader: (1)
Well just finished up the Much More Masters here in Sydney. Surprisingly it was a small field but the quality was still there in the spec classes. Team Waves new software managed TQ and the win in superstock (10.5). In stock it qualified 3rd and finished 5th (3 way tie for 3rd) even with 2 bad finals. Not a bad effort with the driver struggling to get his head around a new chassis. Anyway it lacked nothing.
Hopefully the software is up soon for everyone to play with...
For those interested my settings were
Timeshift-9, Gain-2, Turbo-2, Kickin-3, FDR-5.6
I found turbo of little benefit as the timeshift setting alone was very fast but after I lost a drag with a LRP by 1 inch I was annoyed and turned it on. Temps were in the high 60's with plenty of warm up laps.
Hopefully the software is up soon for everyone to play with...
For those interested my settings were
Timeshift-9, Gain-2, Turbo-2, Kickin-3, FDR-5.6
I found turbo of little benefit as the timeshift setting alone was very fast but after I lost a drag with a LRP by 1 inch I was annoyed and turned it on. Temps were in the high 60's with plenty of warm up laps.
#1255
Well just finished up the Much More Masters here in Sydney. Surprisingly it was a small field but the quality was still there in the spec classes. Team Waves new software managed TQ and the win in superstock (10.5). In stock it qualified 3rd and finished 5th (3 way tie for 3rd) even with 2 bad finals. Not a bad effort with the driver struggling to get his head around a new chassis. Anyway it lacked nothing.
Hopefully the software is up soon for everyone to play with...
For those interested my settings were
Timeshift-9, Gain-2, Turbo-2, Kickin-3, FDR-5.6
I found turbo of little benefit as the timeshift setting alone was very fast but after I lost a drag with a LRP by 1 inch I was annoyed and turned it on. Temps were in the high 60's with plenty of warm up laps.
Hopefully the software is up soon for everyone to play with...
For those interested my settings were
Timeshift-9, Gain-2, Turbo-2, Kickin-3, FDR-5.6
I found turbo of little benefit as the timeshift setting alone was very fast but after I lost a drag with a LRP by 1 inch I was annoyed and turned it on. Temps were in the high 60's with plenty of warm up laps.
Im pleased that you had a good day with the TW
FDR-5.6 was it a big track and what motor was you using
Thanks
#1256
Tech Champion
iTrader: (1)
Motor was a Duo 1. I have found that higher FDR's result in less torque and higher temps due to constantly running at higher timing. Also the lower FDR gives much better grunt out of the turns using the motors natural torque and the ESC simply applies the speed. The BD system (V1 and V2) also seems to work in a similar fashion and gets results too.
#1257
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (22)
Motor was a Duo 1. I have found that higher FDR's result in less torque and higher temps due to constantly running at higher timing. Also the lower FDR gives much better grunt out of the turns using the motors natural torque and the ESC simply applies the speed. The BD system (V1 and V2) also seems to work in a similar fashion and gets results too.
What hole was the timming set on for the Duo?
#1259
Tech Champion
iTrader: (9)
Motor was a Duo 1. I have found that higher FDR's result in less torque and higher temps due to constantly running at higher timing. Also the lower FDR gives much better grunt out of the turns using the motors natural torque and the ESC simply applies the speed. The BD system (V1 and V2) also seems to work in a similar fashion and gets results too.