Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree2991Likes

1/12 forum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2011 | 12:27 PM
  #35896  
Tech Champion
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,191
From: Hawaii, USA
Default

The S132H was popular as well...mostly at the club level. I remember those days as well. Most of the pro drivers were running the Airtronics servos though.
InspGadgt is offline  
Old 05-16-2011 | 01:12 PM
  #35897  
Tech Fanatic
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 900
Default

My 1987 RC12L, with optional carbon chassis, still proudly sports its S132H!! It also sports its Reedy green dot motor, but I'm not now sure if that is in period, or if I just put it in there one day so I didn't lose it!! The speedo and receiver are original, so now all I need is some period cells that still work - fat chance...

(Sorry, not trying to turn this into the 12th retro thread!! )
SlowerOne is offline  
Old 05-16-2011 | 01:48 PM
  #35898  
odpurple's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,192
From: San Francisco
Default

Originally Posted by InspGadgt
"Back in the day" the preferred servo in 1/12th scale was the Airtronics 94145 servo. So most of the kits from that time forward were and are often still designed around that servo. Hence why it comes with an Airtronics servo saver. The servo savers that use an insert are usually too big for 1/12th and have a much stronger spring than what we need for 1/12th.
Actually many racers are now using the Kimbrough medium sero saver (the one with the inserts) because it does have the stronger spring. The TOP and SpeedMerchant cars even specify it in the instructions, not sure about other kits
odpurple is offline  
Old 05-16-2011 | 02:04 PM
  #35899  
Tech Champion
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,191
From: Hawaii, USA
Default

The problem I've seen with the larger servo saver on many cars is 2 fold...first it is too long from from the center point to the ball stud so you have to limit the steering throw much more. And 2nd because it is longer it is more difficult to get the proper angle on the steering links. I've tried the medium one in a pinch but really don't like to use them.
InspGadgt is offline  
Old 05-16-2011 | 02:19 PM
  #35900  
odpurple's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,192
From: San Francisco
Default

Originally Posted by InspGadgt
The problem I've seen with the larger servo saver on many cars is 2 fold...first it is too long from from the center point to the ball stud so you have to limit the steering throw much more. And 2nd because it is longer it is more difficult to get the proper angle on the steering links. I've tried the medium one in a pinch but really don't like to use them.
You mount the ball studs on the lowest holes on the medium saver, that's actually shorter than using the middle holes on the small servo saver, so the angles and throw work out better. And the spring doesn't fail as often
odpurple is offline  
Old 05-16-2011 | 02:25 PM
  #35901  
Tech Champion
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,191
From: Hawaii, USA
Default

I guess maybe I don't hit things as hard as I thought as I've rarely ever had a spring failure with the small servo saver. I think I've had maybe 2 in 15-18 years and those were due to the servo saver coming apart when taking it off of the servo. Of course I don't get to race 1/12th nearly as often as people on the mainland so that could be part of it.
InspGadgt is offline  
Old 05-16-2011 | 02:33 PM
  #35902  
odpurple's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,192
From: San Francisco
Default

Originally Posted by InspGadgt
I guess maybe I don't hit things as hard as I thought as I've rarely ever had a spring failure with the small servo saver. I think I've had maybe 2 in 15-18 years and those were due to the servo saver coming apart when taking it off of the servo. Of course I don't get to race 1/12th nearly as often as people on the mainland so that could be part of it.
We don't get nearly enough of it here either! Of course to me every day would be about right
odpurple is offline  
Old 05-16-2011 | 02:38 PM
  #35903  
andrewdoherty's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,806
From: ★Wylie, TX★
Default

I have busted a few of the Kimbrough 114 SS in hard wrecks, especially in boosted 13.5. Even with the CF/plastic braces, I have had the whole assembly fly apart. I guess I am not quite the driver I wish I was. My only gripe with the 201 SS is the holes are about .5 mm too close to the center which causes the ball cups to bind in certain applications/ackerman positions.
andrewdoherty is offline  
Old 05-16-2011 | 03:11 PM
  #35904  
Tech Champion
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,191
From: Hawaii, USA
Default

I've cracked my fair share of the small servo savers but spring issues not many. Of course I'm slow and run the slow classes and am only getting slower So I don't break stuff as much probably.

As for the holes...I've even used the short holes on the small servo saver a fair amount to get the right angles and tame down the steering.
InspGadgt is offline  
Old 05-16-2011 | 07:00 PM
  #35905  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 164
Default

Hi Guys,

New to the 1/12 Pan cars, I thinking of buying a Serpant S120 what do you guys think of the car?

Also what IFMAR engines (turn) do you guys use for modified 1/12?

Bruce
Australia
driver24 is offline  
Old 05-16-2011 | 07:15 PM
  #35906  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 329
Default

Originally Posted by driver24
Hi Guys,

New to the 1/12 Pan cars, I thinking of buying a Serpant S120 what do you guys think of the car?

Also what IFMAR engines (turn) do you guys use for modified 1/12?

Bruce
Australia
Great car with the On-Point chassis.

For mod I run a LRP 4.0 or Trinity D3 4.0. I run a LRP SXX speedo.


Steve Dunn
Indianapolis, IN USA
sdunnmcp is offline  
Old 05-16-2011 | 10:34 PM
  #35907  
corallyman's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (101)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,707
From: Edmonds, Wash
Default

Originally Posted by driver24
Hi Guys,

New to the 1/12 Pan cars, I thinking of buying a Serpant S120 what do you guys think of the car?

Also what IFMAR engines (turn) do you guys use for modified 1/12?

Bruce
Australia
I also agree with Mr. Dunn, I have a S120 Tbar car, a S120 Link car, and a ON-Point Link S120 as well, love them all.

Steve C.
corallyman is offline  
Old 05-16-2011 | 10:49 PM
  #35908  
LonnyJ1950's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,416
From: Tucson, AZ. USA
Default

Interesting line up for Corallyman!
LonnyJ1950 is offline  
Old 05-17-2011 | 02:22 PM
  #35909  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 130
Default

Originally Posted by sdunnmcp
Great car with the On-Point chassis.

For mod I run a LRP 4.0 or Trinity D3 4.0. I run a LRP SXX speedo.


Steve Dunn
Indianapolis, IN USA
Hi,
using the LRP 4.0 with the sxx... what roll out do you use?

Thanks

PHI/BMI racer is offline  
Old 05-17-2011 | 07:32 PM
  #35910  
nf_ekt's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (115)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,647
From: 22 Acacia Avenue
Default lrp sphere comp question

I know these are used by some 12th guys... question is do I need a receiver pack to use it, or will it run 1s without issues? Thanks, trying to decide on something soon (local class is probably going to be 17.5 blinky, small carpet track).

Last edited by nf_ekt; 05-17-2011 at 07:43 PM.
nf_ekt is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.