Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Tamiya mini cooper >

Tamiya mini cooper

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree295Likes

Tamiya mini cooper

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-2009 | 02:03 AM
  #9856  
Mr_Gleeman's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 262
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by scribbler
I've been racing my M05 on carpet and I've only noticed one problem. Under braking the rear end of the car will swing out. It's the only problem I have with the car. I'm using the stock setup. Is anybody else experiencing this problem? and any remedies? I've got my own ideas of how to cure this problem, but I want additional input to see if I'm on the right track.

Thanks
Hi scribbler, I run on carpet too and here is the scoop on what I believe will solve you rear end swinging out
Firstly I've got a few questions:-
1. Is your car weighted up?
2. What tyre combo front\rear are you using?
3. If your car is weighted up, where is it placed?

Ok after studying some of the threads on what guys have been doing on their MO5 this is how my car is set up and I will share a bit on its performance.
Firstly I run a tight TAO5 ball diff with lead placed behind the front bumper. If you can manage epoxy resin mixed with leadshot in the cavities behind the bumper even better.
One of my Lipo’s has lead on it and depending which one I use with body on the AUW of my MO5 can be between 1350grams to 1385grams.
I use blue springs front with oil weight 50 and yellow springs rear with oil weight 40 built as per Jilles Groskamp and here is the link
The tyres I use are the Tamiya radial S grip front & M grip rear.
Short wheel base and 40% exponential on steering

So after some meticulous building, my MO5 straight out of the box intially and onto carpet performed like this
Ok just joking, it drove like it was pushing into the corners, like a lot of understeering which made me feel a bit uncomfortable. After about 10 maiden laps I pitted. I lowered the ride height in the front about 2mm off the deck approximately and raised in the rear 3 to 4mm. You might want to experiment here but just remember low at the front higher in the rear. You know 'suck it and see' type experiment
Well the verdict from me is that this thing is PLANTED and I couldn't believe the transformation, no more understeer. It felt great and my lap times where great too. Comparing lap times to my MO3 well, would you believe we started a new racing series going in reverse direction out at the regular indoor track I race on an was hard to get a good comparison.
It was quick and even going in reverse I belive my overall lap times will beat the MO3 hands down with a couple more meetings.

How will it go on a conventional outdoor track with this set up you might ask?
Good question, maybe someone can give me some feedback because I race midweek on carpet only.........period.

Wow that was almost like a mni review on the MO5, and a bit long winded but thats how it went for me ..........thumbs up

Cheers


John
Mr_Gleeman is offline  
Old 08-18-2009 | 02:31 AM
  #9857  
cannon's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,245
From: A total distraction
Default

Some further information regarding the M05 that drivers might find of interest:

The M05 in medium mode is actually heavier than the M05 in long mode (extra plastic piece)

In my M03L the weight distribution was 60:40 F:R

In a M05M the weight distribution is 55:45 F:R

In a M05L the weight distribution is 58:42 F:R

This shows that in actual fact the medium has a bigger weight bias to the rear than the long version. Taking this further it would be reasonable to assume that the short wheel base is even worse. This to me means a bigger pendulum effect on the shorter cars

My idea would be to see if I can balance the car so that the bias is similar to the M03L. At this point it is not far wrong

Hope this gives you something to think about
cannon is offline  
Old 08-18-2009 | 02:42 AM
  #9858  
dannyboy15's Avatar
Tech Initiate
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 41
From: england
Default

Originally Posted by Mr_Gleeman
Hi scribbler, I run on carpet too and here is the scoop on what I believe will solve you rear end swinging out
Firstly I've got a few questions:-
1. Is your car weighted up?
2. What tyre combo front\rear are you using?
3. If your car is weighted up, where is it placed?

Ok after studying some of the threads on what guys have been doing on their MO5 this is how my car is set up and I will share a bit on its performance.
Firstly I run a tight TAO5 ball diff with lead placed behind the front bumper. If you can manage epoxy resin mixed with leadshot in the cavities behind the bumper even better.
One of my Lipo’s has lead on it and depending which one I use with body on the AUW of my MO5 can be between 1350grams to 1385grams.
I use blue springs front with oil weight 50 and yellow springs rear with oil weight 40 built as per Jilles Groskamp and here is the The tyres I use are the Tamiya radial S grip front & M grip rear.
Short wheel base and 40% exponential on steering

So after some meticulous building, my MO5 straight out of the box intially and onto carpet performed like this
Ok just joking, it drove like it was pushing into the corners, like a lot of understeering which made me feel a bit uncomfortable. After about 10 maiden laps I pitted. I lowered the ride height in the front about 2mm off the deck approximately and raised in the rear 3 to 4mm. You might want to experiment here but just remember low at the front higher in the rear. You know 'suck it and see' type experiment
Well the verdict from me is that this thing is PLANTED and I couldn't believe the transformation, no more understeer. It felt great and my lap times where great too. Comparing lap times to my MO3 well, would you believe we started a new racing series going in reverse direction out at the regular indoor track I race on an was hard to get a good comparison.
It was quick and even going in reverse I belive my overall lap times will beat the MO3 hands down with a couple more meetings.

How will it go on a conventional outdoor track with this set up you might ask?
Good question, maybe someone can give me some feedback because I race midweek on carpet only.........period.

Wow that was almost like a mni review on the MO5, and a bit long winded but thats how it went for me ..........thumbs up

Cheers


John
so do you think an mo5 would be quicker that an mo3 on a tight carpet track?
dannyboy15 is offline  
Old 08-18-2009 | 03:37 AM
  #9859  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 814
From: downunder
Default

Originally Posted by Mr_Gleeman
Hi scribbler, I run on carpet too and here is the scoop on what I believe will solve you rear end swinging out
Firstly I've got a few questions:-
1. Is your car weighted up?
2. What tyre combo front\rear are you using?
3. If your car is weighted up, where is it placed?

Ok after studying some of the threads on what guys have been doing on their MO5 this is how my car is set up and I will share a bit on its performance.
Firstly I run a tight TAO5 ball diff with lead placed behind the front bumper. If you can manage epoxy resin mixed with leadshot in the cavities behind the bumper even better.
One of my Lipo’s has lead on it and depending which one I use with body on the AUW of my MO5 can be between 1350grams to 1385grams.
I use blue springs front with oil weight 50 and yellow springs rear with oil weight 40 built as per Jilles Groskamp and here is the link
The tyres I use are the Tamiya radial S grip front & M grip rear.
Short wheel base and 40% exponential on steering

So after some meticulous building, my MO5 straight out of the box intially and onto carpet performed like this
Ok just joking, it drove like it was pushing into the corners, like a lot of understeering which made me feel a bit uncomfortable. After about 10 maiden laps I pitted. I lowered the ride height in the front about 2mm off the deck approximately and raised in the rear 3 to 4mm. You might want to experiment here but just remember low at the front higher in the rear. You know 'suck it and see' type experiment
Well the verdict from me is that this thing is PLANTED and I couldn't believe the transformation, no more understeer. It felt great and my lap times where great too. Comparing lap times to my MO3 well, would you believe we started a new racing series going in reverse direction out at the regular indoor track I race on an was hard to get a good comparison.
It was quick and even going in reverse I belive my overall lap times will beat the MO3 hands down with a couple more meetings.

How will it go on a conventional outdoor track with this set up you might ask?
Good question, maybe someone can give me some feedback because I race midweek on carpet only.........period.

Wow that was almost like a mni review on the MO5, and a bit long winded but thats how it went for me ..........thumbs up

Cheers


John
This is the same findings that I had on my first run outdoors with the front lower than the rear it swaped ends less and was just as fast as the MO3.

I run a tight ball diff ( may as well be a spool ), white fronts blue rears ride hard front 32 spice rears.
bjspinner is offline  
Old 08-18-2009 | 06:21 AM
  #9860  
Mr_Gleeman's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 262
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by dannyboy15
so do you think an mo5 would be quicker that an mo3 on a tight carpet track?
Yes for sure, the car feels better ballanced and comfortable to drive, that can only mean eventually faster lap times!


John
Mr_Gleeman is offline  
Old 08-18-2009 | 06:28 AM
  #9861  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 424
From: Rantoul,Il
Default

Mine isn't a Cooper-but it is a mini. WB is 225. Not quite done. I will have to cut out the lower front of the HPI Civic to fit. Don
Attached Thumbnails Tamiya mini cooper-p1010001.jpg   Tamiya mini cooper-p1010002.jpg   Tamiya mini cooper-p1010003.jpg   Tamiya mini cooper-p1010004.jpg  
DLS II is offline  
Old 08-18-2009 | 07:42 PM
  #9862  
edwintklee's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,592
From: wonderfull place called, MALAYSIA.
Default

Originally Posted by tony gray
Such a project needs to begin with the assumption that the M05 is a BETTER car, and therefore worth tearing apart a perfectly good M03 to do the conversion...
that y i kept my M03-R....and build another M05-pro
edwintklee is offline  
Old 08-18-2009 | 08:04 PM
  #9863  
Tech Master
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,930
From: Orange County
Default

Originally Posted by tony gray
Such a project needs to begin with the assumption that the M05 is a BETTER car, and therefore worth tearing apart a perfectly good M03 to do the conversion...
So your saying your test findings have an M03 quicker than an M05
madjack is offline  
Old 08-19-2009 | 03:45 AM
  #9864  
oldnwise's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 568
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

Fish .. two weeks back you're set-up advice was to just throw the mini on the track.
Originally Posted by cannon
Far too complicated.

Just put in on the track and race it
The next week you're publishing high tech weight distribution data.

Originally Posted by cannon
Some further information regarding the M05 that drivers might find of interest:

The M05 in medium mode is actually heavier than the M05 in long mode (extra plastic piece)

In my M03L the weight distribution was 60:40 F:R

In a M05M the weight distribution is 55:45 F:R

In a M05L the weight distribution is 58:42 F:R

This shows that in actual fact the medium has a bigger weight bias to the rear than the long version. Taking this further it would be reasonable to assume that the short wheel base is even worse. This to me means a bigger pendulum effect on the shorter cars

My idea would be to see if I can balance the car so that the bias is similar to the M03L. At this point it is not far wrong

Hope this gives you something to think about
oldnwise is offline  
Old 08-19-2009 | 03:49 AM
  #9865  
cannon's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,245
From: A total distraction
Default

Originally Posted by oldnwise
Fish .. two weeks back you're set-up advice was to just throw the mini on the track.


The next week you're publishing high tech weight distribution data.



My original statement was in reference to a M03. The M05 needs a bit more thought.

As for the high tech data .. the more information the more confused the other racers will get
cannon is offline  
Old 08-19-2009 | 05:01 AM
  #9866  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 636
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by DLS II
Mine isn't a Cooper-but it is a mini. WB is 225. Not quite done. I will have to cut out the lower front of the HPI Civic to fit. Don
He He... good to see some old FF01 parts flying round... still bashing my full size one, but this looks pretty cool.
$$$... is offline  
Old 08-19-2009 | 08:19 PM
  #9867  
Mini Racer 95's Avatar
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 78
Default

hey what is the better buy a spektrum 2.0 or 3.0
Mini Racer 95 is offline  
Old 08-19-2009 | 11:59 PM
  #9868  
scribbler's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 428
From: Calgary, AB
Default

Originally Posted by Mini Racer 95
hey what is the better buy a spektrum 2.0 or 3.0
The only real difference between these two radio's is the 2.0 is two channels, and the 3.0 is three channels. I believe, for the most part, the fatures are identical. For a mini you don't need a third channel, but in applications like rock crawlers a third channel is a must. I bought mine when they first came out, so I can't remmember if there is any further advatages of one over the other.
scribbler is offline  
Old 08-20-2009 | 06:27 AM
  #9869  
Jam-ehz's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 592
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Mini Racer 95
hey what is the better buy a spektrum 2.0 or 3.0
The DX3 has 4 memory slots, DX2 has only 2.. something to consider if you're running multiple chassis.
Jam-ehz is offline  
Old 08-20-2009 | 07:03 AM
  #9870  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 190
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Mini Racer 95
hey what is the better buy a spektrum 2.0 or 3.0
The 3.0 also has exponential, very useful for Mini.
mariob62 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.