Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Tamiya mini cooper >

Tamiya mini cooper

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree295Likes

Tamiya mini cooper

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2017 | 09:18 AM
  #29461  
JatoTheRipper's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,520
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by gigaplex
So I think I found out why my M05v2R was pulling left when accelerating. I checked the corner weights using 4 small scales and found that the front right and rear left wheels were carrying a lot more weight than the opposing ones. I checked the preload of the shocks, and the corners carrying the most weight were set quite a bit shorter than the others, yet those wheels touched the ground first when testing droop. I suspected the chassis was twisted, so I loosened all the screws connecting the front half to the rear half of the chassis, gave it a wiggle, then tightened it back up. The corner weights balance pretty close to even now with roughly equal length shocks. Hopefully it runs straighter next time I take it for a spin.
Please, do give us an update. This was one of my concerns while building the M-07. I tried to tighten everything evenly and in a cross pattern so that I didn't distort the chassis.

The disappearing tape on the bottom of the chassis was one of my concerns. Because of this I also put tape on the inside and I'm glad I did. I have an idea to fix this though.
JatoTheRipper is offline  
Old 07-31-2017 | 11:25 AM
  #29462  
monkeyracing's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,305
From: Calgary, AB
Default

Adjusting springs corner to corner seems vital, especially on the 05. Adjusted mine when it was misbehaving and it was 100% better immediately.

In 07 news, I ordered a super shorty pack, because returning to a full size lipo feels like de-evolution to me. I'm may be wrong, as I often am. The upshot is it was only $20 after discounts. The downside is I still don't get to drive the car until end of September.
monkeyracing is offline  
Old 07-31-2017 | 12:57 PM
  #29463  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,313
From: Chicagoland
Default

I'm seriously considering the super shorty pack too. My only concern is that a lighter battery is going to raise the CG of what is already going to be a pretty tippy car.
JatoTheRipper likes this.
Nerobro is offline  
Old 07-31-2017 | 01:27 PM
  #29464  
monkeyracing's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,305
From: Calgary, AB
Default

My thought on this is centering mass, based on what I notice when I switched from full size to shorty pack in my 05 V2. I thought about a low CG pack and may still give one a try. I'll probably try a full size battery as well, just to cover all the bases.
monkeyracing is offline  
Old 07-31-2017 | 05:26 PM
  #29465  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,313
From: Chicagoland
Default

With how short these cars are, and how fast they can snap into oversteer, I don't think we need to worry to much about polar moment of intertia.
Nerobro is offline  
Old 07-31-2017 | 06:18 PM
  #29466  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 259
Default

I'm running a 3500mah low cg shorty in the M07, it works well. Just needs a way bigger pinion gear.
altitudelow is offline  
Old 07-31-2017 | 06:25 PM
  #29467  
JatoTheRipper's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,520
From: PA
Default

I think the full-size battery helps keep the M-07 planted. I think traction will become more of an issue with a shorty.

I nearly destroyed my tape in a short run. Tamiya has to come up with a better fix for the bottom hole.
JatoTheRipper is offline  
Old 07-31-2017 | 06:53 PM
  #29468  
gigaplex's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,766
From: Melbourne, VIC
Default

Originally Posted by JatoTheRipper
Please, do give us an update. This was one of my concerns while building the M-07. I tried to tighten everything evenly and in a cross pattern so that I didn't distort the chassis.

The disappearing tape on the bottom of the chassis was one of my concerns. Because of this I also put tape on the inside and I'm glad I did. I have an idea to fix this though.
I'll post back when I next get a chance to run the M05v2R after removing the tweak, it'll probably be at least a week before I get a chance though.

I corner weighted my M07 while I was at it. Perfect distribution with zero effort, I made no attempts to manage tweak or balance it beforehand.

JatoTheRipper likes this.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 07-31-2017 | 07:44 PM
  #29469  
gigaplex's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,766
From: Melbourne, VIC
Default

Originally Posted by Nerobro
With how short these cars are, and how fast they can snap into oversteer, I don't think we need to worry to much about polar moment of intertia.
I use shorty packs on my M05 as I don't like dragging the battery on the asphalt when it leans.
JatoTheRipper and Nerobro like this.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 07-31-2017 | 10:41 PM
  #29470  
fritzthecat's Avatar
Tech Initiate
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 21
From: Austria, ST.P.
Default

Originally Posted by gigaplex
The aluminium glass fibre tape used to seal the gearbox didn't last long. This was after roughly 10 laps.

tape it inside
fritzthecat is offline  
Old 08-05-2017 | 10:56 AM
  #29471  
KA2AEV's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,490
From: Tottenville, NYC
Default

Anyone else experience some troubles installing the motor in the 07's???
Looks like I have to add spacers inbetween the motor and the heatsink for it to fit comfortably!!!
KA2AEV is offline  
Old 08-07-2017 | 01:04 PM
  #29472  
Scionara05's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,402
From: South nj
Default

Ok I have a gold edition m05 with no droop settings what do I need to convert it to a square pack and be able to set droop without putting limiters in the shocks
Scionara05 is offline  
Old 08-07-2017 | 01:13 PM
  #29473  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,313
From: Chicagoland
Default

You need to pick up the M05 Version II swingarms, and chassis. You need to order two of the swingarms, as they come in a set of "one front, one rear" arm. You also need to eithe rorder the M05v2 pivot pins, or some longer screw pins for the rear arms. Finally, you need 4 m3 setscrews to do the droop settings.

You'll lose most of the gold.
Nerobro is offline  
Old 08-07-2017 | 01:24 PM
  #29474  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,313
From: Chicagoland
Default

Ok, my turn.

I put the blue/white spring combination on my M05. It seems excessively stiff. Even the red/yellow setup seems far to stiff.

Is this compensation for the floppy M05 chassis? Or can going down the "really soft setup" rabbit hole be the right thing to do?
Nerobro is offline  
Old 08-07-2017 | 05:19 PM
  #29475  
gigaplex's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,766
From: Melbourne, VIC
Default

Originally Posted by Nerobro
You need to pick up the M05 Version II swingarms, and chassis. You need to order two of the swingarms, as they come in a set of "one front, one rear" arm. You also need to eithe rorder the M05v2 pivot pins, or some longer screw pins for the rear arms. Finally, you need 4 m3 setscrews to do the droop settings.

You'll lose most of the gold.
You actually get a complete set of arms with 54606, no need to order 2.

If you're using an alloy motor mount you'll want to get the v2 version of that too.
gigaplex is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.