Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Tamiya mini cooper >

Tamiya mini cooper

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree295Likes

Tamiya mini cooper

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2017 | 04:08 PM
  #29446  
caltek1's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,422
Default

I elected to use full size TC TRF shocks on my M07 with the kit springs. I had to wind down the collars a long way, as I am using sweep 55mm tyres, however the car works well.
I did not measure my ride height, I do it more by eye and pushing down on the car. I do have the front lower than the front.
I will measure when I get home. Photos of my M07 are attached.

Regards
50 Cal
Attached Thumbnails Tamiya mini cooper-20170716_105519.jpg   Tamiya mini cooper-20170716_110536.jpg   Tamiya mini cooper-20170716_152102.jpg  

Last edited by caltek1; 07-19-2017 at 04:40 PM.
caltek1 is offline  
Old 07-19-2017 | 04:19 PM
  #29447  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 259
Default

Is there a gearset to convert the minis' (M07 particularly) spur to 48/64 pitch, or does everyone just buy mod .6 pinions?
altitudelow is offline  
Old 07-19-2017 | 04:29 PM
  #29448  
caltek1's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,422
Default

just purchase 0.6 pitch pinion gears
caltek1 is offline  
Old 07-20-2017 | 11:28 AM
  #29449  
marcos graveyar's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 253
From: Newtownforbes, Ireland
Default

Don't know if this has been posted before, link to Tamiya's M07 patrs list.

http://www.tamiya.com/japan/download...TS_CATALOG.pdf
Laguna Bozo likes this.
marcos graveyar is offline  
Old 07-20-2017 | 03:28 PM
  #29450  
monkeyracing's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,305
From: Calgary, AB
Default

That's a great resource. Thanks.

Does anyone know what needs to be changed to switch the M05 dcj axles over to the M07 version? I'm thinking just the dogbones?
monkeyracing is offline  
Old 07-21-2017 | 05:20 AM
  #29451  
barts71m's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,592
From: Somewhere Pretty Awesome
Default

Originally Posted by monkeyracing
That's a great resource. Thanks.

Does anyone know what needs to be changed to switch the M05 dcj axles over to the M07 version? I'm thinking just the dogbones?
Would be just longer dogbones, think the m07 is 33mm and older m03/m05 is 30mm...i think
barts71m is offline  
Old 07-22-2017 | 12:57 PM
  #29452  
JatoTheRipper's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,520
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by sipaboy
I had both mo3 and m04 and guess what I still have.?An m03. I just like the mini tires and fwd. Having the m04 is like having a wannabe touring car. Defeats the purpose of what the class calls mini. I expect mini tires/rims and fwd in a MINI class.
Can you expand on this? Why is the M04 a wannabe touring car?
JatoTheRipper is offline  
Old 07-22-2017 | 01:18 PM
  #29453  
monkeyracing's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,305
From: Calgary, AB
Default

Originally Posted by barts71m
Would be just longer dogbones, think the m07 is 33mm and older m03/m05 is 30mm...i think
Just need to track down a part number now. I think iv confirmed th outer sections are the same.
monkeyracing is offline  
Old 07-22-2017 | 10:00 PM
  #29454  
rc_square24's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 925
Default

Originally Posted by JatoTheRipper
Can you expand on this? Why is the M04 a wannabe touring car?
I think he's referring to the M04s with TC sized wheels (BMW, S2000, etc.).

But then don't forget that the MX5 which has M-sized wheels was released on the M04M.
rc_square24 is offline  
Old 07-23-2017 | 11:17 AM
  #29455  
monkeyracing's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,305
From: Calgary, AB
Default

The biggest flaw of the 04 was that gearing was off by 1 tooth, compared to the other minis. I wish I understood why Tamiya did this. Maybe it's because the "standard" mini FDR had only been used in one model by this point, so there wasn't much history to stand by.

Anyway, the 04 was wickedly fast and agile if conditions were good and you set it up well. In very other case, it was a horrendous pig. And for some reason, the last few I ran chewed through stock gear diffs like a fat kid on a cake.
monkeyracing is offline  
Old 07-29-2017 | 08:56 AM
  #29456  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 201
Default

What's the consensus or general view towards the m05 ver ii r?


There seems to be a clearance sale for this kit. Not sure if sales for this kit is bad or just clearing space for the m07 kits.
novaris is offline  
Old 07-29-2017 | 09:55 AM
  #29457  
Tech Master
iTrader: (99)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,498
From: Maryland
Default

the m05v2r is the best M05 kit offered. comes with all of the parts that make the M05 work at it's best. the clearance is due to the release of the M07 kits.
Markus is offline  
Old 07-29-2017 | 10:30 PM
  #29458  
gigaplex's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,766
From: Melbourne, VIC
Default

I took my M07 out for a test run today. Was a bit twitchy with the Team Powers 36 tyres, but when I switched to the Pit Shimizu 33 front 27 rear it felt rock solid. No idea if the lap times were quicker than my M05v2R as the practice timing system wasn't working for some reason.

I noticed my M05v2R pulls left when accelerating, but tracks straight once up to speed, and tracks straight under braking. Will need to check the balancing on it, and retest with the Shimizu tyres (only ever run TP36 on that car).

The aluminium glass fibre tape used to seal the gearbox didn't last long. This was after roughly 10 laps.

gigaplex is offline  
Old 07-30-2017 | 01:34 AM
  #29459  
gigaplex's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,766
From: Melbourne, VIC
Default

So I think I found out why my M05v2R was pulling left when accelerating. I checked the corner weights using 4 small scales and found that the front right and rear left wheels were carrying a lot more weight than the opposing ones. I checked the preload of the shocks, and the corners carrying the most weight were set quite a bit shorter than the others, yet those wheels touched the ground first when testing droop. I suspected the chassis was twisted, so I loosened all the screws connecting the front half to the rear half of the chassis, gave it a wiggle, then tightened it back up. The corner weights balance pretty close to even now with roughly equal length shocks. Hopefully it runs straighter next time I take it for a spin.
JatoTheRipper and Nerobro like this.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 07-31-2017 | 08:17 AM
  #29460  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,313
From: Chicagoland
Default

Yeah, you can ignore everything I wrote here. :-) Go and drive minis.
Nerobro is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.