Motor Analyzer Sensor Readings
#1
Thread Starter
Tech Adept
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 232
From: New York
I put my Trinity d4 1s 17.5 on a motor analyzer & the sensor readings were way off. Big spread on all 3 regardless of what timing is set. I played with the shims trying to get them equal but it didn't work.
Here's the result of of the last test I did at 30° timing:
A = 19, B = 18, C = 19, Average 18°.
RPM 18630
KV = 2300
AMP = 1.1
U = 8.1
This was with 2 shims. The addition of an extra shim brought the average up to 19° but lowered the other numbers.
I have a second motor of the same kind and am trying to match them as closely as possible.
Any thoughts or tips?
Thanks in advance!
Here's the result of of the last test I did at 30° timing:
A = 19, B = 18, C = 19, Average 18°.
RPM 18630
KV = 2300
AMP = 1.1
U = 8.1
This was with 2 shims. The addition of an extra shim brought the average up to 19° but lowered the other numbers.
I have a second motor of the same kind and am trying to match them as closely as possible.
Any thoughts or tips?
Thanks in advance!
#2
I put my Trinity d4 1s 17.5 on a motor analyzer & the sensor readings were way off. Big spread on all 3 regardless of what timing is set. I played with the shims trying to get them equal but it didn't work.
Here's the result of of the last test I did at 30° timing:
A = 19, B = 18, C = 19, Average 18°.
RPM 18630
KV = 2300
AMP = 1.1
U = 8.1
This was with 2 shims. The addition of an extra shim brought the average up to 19° but lowered the other numbers.
I have a second motor of the same kind and am trying to match them as closely as possible.
Any thoughts or tips?
Thanks in advance!
Here's the result of of the last test I did at 30° timing:
A = 19, B = 18, C = 19, Average 18°.
RPM 18630
KV = 2300
AMP = 1.1
U = 8.1
This was with 2 shims. The addition of an extra shim brought the average up to 19° but lowered the other numbers.
I have a second motor of the same kind and am trying to match them as closely as possible.
Any thoughts or tips?
Thanks in advance!
#3
Thread Starter
Tech Adept
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 232
From: New York
I thought the average meant it should match the number on the endbell. That's where I was confused. But thank you for clearing that up.
#4
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,368
From: Central Wisconsin USA




