Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree256Likes

Tamiya TRF419

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2016 | 02:35 PM
  #2221  
rtenzo02's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 256
From: Ca.
Default

Originally Posted by rtenzo02
Im getting ready to rebuild my gear diff and read back on page 56 that replacing the bushings with bearings was not a good idea. Seems if the diff fluid is gona leak past the shim and oring to reach the bearing it would be the same using the bushing. As of now my diff is pretty smooth and leak free. I was thinking about rebuilding it with some ceramic bearings but if its going to be a problem then hoping your feedback will save me the hassle.
Anyone ?
rtenzo02 is offline  
Old 01-17-2016 | 06:47 PM
  #2222  
Tech Master
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,117
Default

Stay with the bushing in the diff I would say.
190mph is offline  
Old 01-17-2016 | 06:56 PM
  #2223  
Tech Master
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,117
Default

Is there a brace for the top deck to steering posts for the steering rack as an option?

The hole in the top deck directly above in between almost suggests there is this possibility. Yokomo has this:

http://banzaihobby.com/Yokomo-B7-201...b8abe53257cfa9

I know of Qatmix's carbon fiber straight post to post brace. Just wondering.
190mph is offline  
Old 01-17-2016 | 08:08 PM
  #2224  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,741
Default

there is one that comes with the 2mm chassis - not sure if available on it's own or not.
cplus is offline  
Old 01-17-2016 | 10:23 PM
  #2225  
Simmi's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 307
Default

Originally Posted by 190mph
Is there a brace for the top deck to steering posts for the steering rack as an option?

The hole in the top deck directly above in between almost suggests there is this possibility. Yokomo has this:

http://banzaihobby.com/Yokomo-B7-201...b8abe53257cfa9

I know of Qatmix's carbon fiber straight post to post brace. Just wondering.
I build my car with the Tamiya TRF 2mm Carbon Chassis and the brace where included.
Attached Thumbnails Tamiya TRF419-steering_brace.jpg  
Simmi is offline  
Old 01-17-2016 | 10:30 PM
  #2226  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 242
Default

Does anyone have problem that the rear toe aren't exactly the same? Yesterday, I put my car on setup station (integy 1/10 setup station).
I found rear toe has about 0.5 degree difference.
I know rear toe are not adjustable, does this mean I might have bent anything?
yifuqiao is offline  
Old 01-18-2016 | 04:02 AM
  #2227  
Tech Master
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,458
From: santa monica / manchester
Default

Originally Posted by yifuqiao
Does anyone have problem that the rear toe aren't exactly the same? Yesterday, I put my car on setup station (integy 1/10 setup station).
I found rear toe has about 0.5 degree difference.
I know rear toe are not adjustable, does this mean I might have bent anything?
Check the axles are fine and there is no movement. The rear toe should be the same for both wheels.

Other things to check are

The ball connector at the top of the rear hub might me bent.
The rear hinge pin

However I would mostly say that it is going to be down to movement in the rear axles if they are not shimmed.
Qatmix is offline  
Old 01-19-2016 | 10:32 AM
  #2228  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (129)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,656
Default 42296 - Tamiya 419 Aluminum Chassis

Has anyone tried this chassis on their car, especially for carpet racing? Our local track had pretty low grip carpet over the last 2 yrears, but recently more 1/12th scale racers have been running and the car starts to generate crazy levels of grip by mid race day. Traction roll is a major problem by round #3. I think the thinner/ heavier lower plate will lower the CG considerably and any reduction in grip caused by the stiffer chassis could be overcome with softer springs.

Any thoughts?

Erik
ewippler is offline  
Old 01-19-2016 | 10:35 AM
  #2229  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (119)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,299
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by ewippler
Has anyone tried this chassis on their car, especially for carpet racing? Our local track had pretty low grip carpet over the last 2 yrears, but recently more 1/12th scale racers have been running and the car starts to generate crazy levels of grip by mid race day. Traction roll is a major problem by round #3. I think the thinner/ heavier lower plate will lower the CG considerably and any reduction in grip caused by the stiffer chassis could be overcome with softer springs.

Any thoughts?

Erik
Hey Erik... just ask.. You are welcome to drive mine next time we meet. Drive a whole qualifier.
Chris Furman is offline  
Old 01-19-2016 | 12:20 PM
  #2230  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 242
Default

Hey, guys,
My friend at track found me a very very forgiving setup for my 419.
I love it so much.
I think it matches my current skills very well(I only started this hobby 1 month ago).
The car does feel a lil lazy when turning(my friend's car was a more twitchy , for the lack of bettery word), but that also means it gives your radio steering "more resolutions".
I am using a M11x, EPA was set to max(to the point you can go more left or right), dual rate was about 80%, exp is 0.
Right now, I can drive at 100% power and not hitting the board.
Very happy with my skill development so far.
Forgot to mention, motor is 24k 17.5


yifuqiao is offline  
Old 01-19-2016 | 06:31 PM
  #2231  
97Clemow's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 120
Default

Originally Posted by yifuqiao
Does anyone have problem that the rear toe aren't exactly the same? Yesterday, I put my car on setup station (integy 1/10 setup station).
I found rear toe has about 0.5 degree difference.
I know rear toe are not adjustable, does this mean I might have bent anything?
in my opinion, if something was bent, it would likely be the hinge pin. anything bent above the pins would be more likely to effect the camber if the pins are straight.

I have had differences in my toe settings before on a new hudy set-up station before. I believe that the toe blocks were inaccurate. this was several years ago(TRF 415/416 era) and since then, maybe Try Hard could back me up( but I think he has moved on to the "other" r/c car manufacturer), they have improved with the introduction of the newer "split blocks" and newer style toe blocks i.e. with italic lettering and the thicker design.

you wouldn't be using the older style blocks, would you? (just asking)

P.S. if you have a good crash you can still bend the ear of the rear toe block. this usually
is the case if you can move the arm forwards and backwards on the pin while everything is still attached to chassis. ( nothing to brag about but I have bent a fair share of bits )
Attached Thumbnails Tamiya TRF419-img_5653.jpg  

Last edited by 97Clemow; 01-19-2016 at 06:45 PM. Reason: post script
97Clemow is offline  
Old 01-19-2016 | 06:39 PM
  #2232  
rtypec's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,978
From: SoCal
Default

Here's a video from a few weeks ago of a couple TRF 419s putting in practice laps and generally messing around with the a few fast guys at TQ Raceway. My 419 is pretty vanilla and doesn't have an aluminum chassis or a light weight body. The other 419 has an aluminum chassis and was run with standard and short shock tower configurations.

TRF419 Practice at TQ RC Racing

+ YouTube Video
ERROR: If you can see this, then YouTube is down or you don't have Flash installed.
Qatmix likes this.
rtypec is offline  
Old 01-19-2016 | 06:41 PM
  #2233  
97Clemow's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 120
Default

sorry repeat of P.S.
97Clemow is offline  
Old 01-19-2016 | 11:59 PM
  #2234  
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 66
From: Poland
Default

@rtypec can I ask for your setup?
J. Kłapacz is offline  
Old 01-20-2016 | 01:39 AM
  #2235  
niznai's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,972
From: All over the place
Default

Originally Posted by yifuqiao
Does anyone have problem that the rear toe aren't exactly the same? Yesterday, I put my car on setup station (integy 1/10 setup station).
I found rear toe has about 0.5 degree difference.
I know rear toe are not adjustable, does this mean I might have bent anything?
Originally Posted by 97Clemow
in my opinion, if something was bent, it would likely be the hinge pin. anything bent above the pins would be more likely to effect the camber if the pins are straight.

I have had differences in my toe settings before on a new hudy set-up station before. I believe that the toe blocks were inaccurate. this was several years ago(TRF 415/416 era) and since then, maybe Try Hard could back me up( but I think he has moved on to the "other" r/c car manufacturer), they have improved with the introduction of the newer "split blocks" and newer style toe blocks i.e. with italic lettering and the thicker design.

you wouldn't be using the older style blocks, would you? (just asking)

P.S. if you have a good crash you can still bend the ear of the rear toe block. this usually
is the case if you can move the arm forwards and backwards on the pin while everything is still attached to chassis. ( nothing to brag about but I have bent a fair share of bits )
Yeap, I reported the same problem with my TRF418 since new. My car had one full degree of difference left to right. Even changing the split blocks to the old one piece style (tried a few), there was still a difference in rear toe, so I think the holes are drilled in the wrong place in the chassis. I swapped the split mounts around left to right of course to check and the problem was the same. Changing to a Samix chassis didn't solve the problem so either the hole locations were copied from the original and the problem was carried on, or there is some other really fiendshly difficult to pinpoint cause.

I have a Hudy setup station and none of my other cars have this problem (these include a TA05R in which I use the same old style single piece blocks I used to check the TRF418).

I corrected the problem by moving to Xray old style split blocks (single screw; I had to drill a hole in the chassis for the locating pin) and it takes an extra 1mm shim on one side to even out the toe. Tamiya has gone down in quality of their manufacturing in my opinion.
niznai is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.