Tamiya TRF419
#211
Tech Master
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,458
From: santa monica / manchester
The issue I have is that I didn't really like the bracket around the back on the bd7 14, I thought it just made that part of the chassis unnecessarily stiff at that part of the chassis, and it didn't feel as nice (to me) on carpet as the BD7 13 The VB7 seems to not have that, whilst the 419 does..
At the moment I'm just keen on seeing how it goes on track, I'm trying not to get excited, but its a new chassis number so my OCD will take over at some point and I'll get it.
At the moment I'm just keen on seeing how it goes on track, I'm trying not to get excited, but its a new chassis number so my OCD will take over at some point and I'll get it.
#213
As for the stiffer rear end with 2014 motor mount, I think that's aimed more towards asphalt than carpet. I also felt the BD7 2013 was smoother than the 2014 indoors. The worlds is asphalt so we know the direction that the major contenders should take.
#214
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 644
From: UK
The issue I have is that I didn't really like the bracket around the back on the bd7 14, I thought it just made that part of the chassis unnecessarily stiff at that part of the chassis, and it didn't feel as nice (to me) on carpet as the BD7 13 The VB7 seems to not have that, whilst the 419 does..
At the moment I'm just keen on seeing how it goes on track, I'm trying not to get excited, but its a new chassis number so my OCD will take over at some point and I'll get it.
At the moment I'm just keen on seeing how it goes on track, I'm trying not to get excited, but its a new chassis number so my OCD will take over at some point and I'll get it.
#218
So now that Yokomo have shown the BD7-2015 we know what Tamiya overlooked...
I have to say I'm a bit disappointed in the 419. I understand why they have gone for the spine-style motor mount (because Yokomo have!), but it looks very stiff and even though there is an option to mount it with the middle screws the mount still presses down on the chassis at the sides.
But most disappointing is the totally unnecessary switch to angled suspension blocks, renders pitbox parts useless and there is nothing wrong with the standard blocks.
So all in all a more obvious Yokomo copy than the 418, last years car was the catch-up version, the 419 should really have been the move-ahead version but sadly it is still a step behind. And there still isn't a decent Lipo mount or anti-roll bar mount. But at least Tamiya will include the DCJs and the floating servo mount.
I have to say I'm a bit disappointed in the 419. I understand why they have gone for the spine-style motor mount (because Yokomo have!), but it looks very stiff and even though there is an option to mount it with the middle screws the mount still presses down on the chassis at the sides.
But most disappointing is the totally unnecessary switch to angled suspension blocks, renders pitbox parts useless and there is nothing wrong with the standard blocks.
So all in all a more obvious Yokomo copy than the 418, last years car was the catch-up version, the 419 should really have been the move-ahead version but sadly it is still a step behind. And there still isn't a decent Lipo mount or anti-roll bar mount. But at least Tamiya will include the DCJs and the floating servo mount.
#220
One upshot I found was that now Yokomo and Tamiya one piece suspension blocks are totally interchangeable. Yokomo's move was maybe unintentional but I have an entire collection of Tamiya mounts I can use on my BD7 and no reason to buy new ones for the 418.
I am sure many other people are in the same boat.
This also means that ultimately one can carry over the entire suspension from one car to the other if they wanted which opens an entire new realm of possibilities especially in part supply challenged parts of the world like mine.
As for the motor mount I too feel Tamiya has left us wanting. The Samix conversion seemed the natural path to go, but perhaps Tamiya still wants to pick some more money on upgrades (or hand over to third parties).
Personally I will probably invest in another Yokomo mount for the 418.
I am sure many other people are in the same boat.
This also means that ultimately one can carry over the entire suspension from one car to the other if they wanted which opens an entire new realm of possibilities especially in part supply challenged parts of the world like mine.
As for the motor mount I too feel Tamiya has left us wanting. The Samix conversion seemed the natural path to go, but perhaps Tamiya still wants to pick some more money on upgrades (or hand over to third parties).
Personally I will probably invest in another Yokomo mount for the 418.
#222
Tech Master
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,458
From: santa monica / manchester
So now that Yokomo have shown the BD7-2015 we know what Tamiya overlooked...
I have to say I'm a bit disappointed in the 419. I understand why they have gone for the spine-style motor mount (because Yokomo have!), but it looks very stiff and even though there is an option to mount it with the middle screws the mount still presses down on the chassis at the sides.
But most disappointing is the totally unnecessary switch to angled suspension blocks, renders pitbox parts useless and there is nothing wrong with the standard blocks.
So all in all a more obvious Yokomo copy than the 418, last years car was the catch-up version, the 419 should really have been the move-ahead version but sadly it is still a step behind. And there still isn't a decent Lipo mount or anti-roll bar mount. But at least Tamiya will include the DCJs and the floating servo mount.
I have to say I'm a bit disappointed in the 419. I understand why they have gone for the spine-style motor mount (because Yokomo have!), but it looks very stiff and even though there is an option to mount it with the middle screws the mount still presses down on the chassis at the sides.
But most disappointing is the totally unnecessary switch to angled suspension blocks, renders pitbox parts useless and there is nothing wrong with the standard blocks.
So all in all a more obvious Yokomo copy than the 418, last years car was the catch-up version, the 419 should really have been the move-ahead version but sadly it is still a step behind. And there still isn't a decent Lipo mount or anti-roll bar mount. But at least Tamiya will include the DCJs and the floating servo mount.
The new BD7 looks fantastic, the fact you can move the whole motor mount forward if you want to is great.
I suppose I will see how it goes at the worlds, but the BD7 has taken some bigger advances than most of the other cars announced, and they have been on a roll.
#223
Tech Addict
iTrader: (5)
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 572
From: Philippines
The way I see it is that it makes the chassis softer than the standard 'straight' blocks, for both separate and 1-piece blocks. The angled blocks have narrower mounting points, and is probably particularly aimed for asphalt use.
#224
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,741
The sway bar mounts are not there, but they have been on huge yokomo for ages, so if they wanted to copy them they would have - I expect that have a reason (no idea what it is....)



256Likes