Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree2Likes

Tamiya TRF418

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2014 | 04:44 AM
  #616  
xrayaustin's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,174
From: St. Pete
Default

Thanks alot. Makes alot more since now. Thst chart is exactly what I was looking for. So a C and C front is a middle track width with no arm sweep and XA & E rear is 3° toe in. Thinking maybe an XA & C or D would be better for stock. Thanks
xrayaustin is offline  
Old 02-18-2014 | 10:48 AM
  #617  
Simmi's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 307
Default

I use in Front C, C and Rear XA, D.

Drive Stock Class 13,5T and this year I still drove no round with my new TRF 418
Simmi is offline  
Old 02-19-2014 | 08:32 AM
  #618  
xrayaustin's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,174
From: St. Pete
Default

Originally Posted by Simmi
I use in Front C, C and Rear XA, D.

Drive Stock Class 13,5T and this year I still drove no round with my new TRF 418
Going to put my first race on it this weekend a rear d block is what I'mgoing to try. Possibly even a c. TThanks
xrayaustin is offline  
Old 02-19-2014 | 10:47 AM
  #619  
b20btec's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,206
From: Sugar Land
Default

Originally Posted by NolanP
So I've found the difference between the shims under the inner ball stud are very crucial on carpet. At 0-1mm on Sweeps I traction roll. 1.5-2.0 the car is very unstable if you hit a dot. At 3-4mm the car becomes very stable and very forgiving. When your in a great setup window a .5mm difference can be huge. So if Sean is running a 4mm shim he may be on high bite carpet.

I don't know Sean's grip level at his track but his setup for our track which is low/medium traction seems a little pushy but very stable. It's a fantastic base setup and highly recommend it as a starting point. As all tracks are different in grip no one setup is perfect but you can take that setup almost any where.

I will finalize my setup this week but it's not all that different. But it does use the stock springs as I didn't want to use anything else at first. I just have a few more things to try till my setup is final. This is a baseline for Sweep 32's for Nats if I can go.
I'm not sure a 4mm shim would work without changing to a longer length ball stud if I remember correctly. I think I had some laying around that was 8mm long. On high bite carpet with soft springs 3-4mm shims and hpi blue soft springs seems to be the ticket!
b20btec is offline  
Old 02-20-2014 | 04:27 AM
  #620  
narcotiks's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 452
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by NolanP
So I've found the difference between the shims under the inner ball stud are very crucial on carpet. At 0-1mm on Sweeps I traction roll. 1.5-2.0 the car is very unstable if you hit a dot. At 3-4mm the car becomes very stable and very forgiving. When your in a great setup window a .5mm difference can be huge. So if Sean is running a 4mm shim he may be on high bite carpet.

I don't know Sean's grip level at his track but his setup for our track which is low/medium traction seems a little pushy but very stable. It's a fantastic base setup and highly recommend it as a starting point. As all tracks are different in grip no one setup is perfect but you can take that setup almost any where.

I will finalize my setup this week but it's not all that different. But it does use the stock springs as I didn't want to use anything else at first. I just have a few more things to try till my setup is final. This is a baseline for Sweep 32's for Nats if I can go.
Have you guys tried taking out the 0.5 shims from under the blocks and running 0mm-1mm on the inner ball stud?
Reason i ask is, on the 417, 3mm-4mm worked best on the inner ballstud, but the 418 with no shims on the inner ballstud is at the same height as 3.5mm on the 417.
I've been running on medium/high grip asphalt and found that marc's BIRC setup works really well. Changed the car heaps but keep going back to BIRC setup. When the grip is lower, no shims under the blocks works really well, with no shims on the upper link. In higher grip conditions, 0.5 under the blocks and 0mm or 1mm under the upper link feels best.
narcotiks is offline  
Old 02-22-2014 | 08:32 AM
  #621  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 129
From: North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by narcotiks
Have you guys tried taking out the 0.5 shims from under the blocks and running 0mm-1mm on the inner ball stud?
Reason i ask is, on the 417, 3mm-4mm worked best on the inner ballstud, but the 418 with no shims on the inner ballstud is at the same height as 3.5mm on the 417.
I've been running on medium/high grip asphalt and found that marc's BIRC setup works really well. Changed the car heaps but keep going back to BIRC setup. When the grip is lower, no shims under the blocks works really well, with no shims on the upper link. In higher grip conditions, 0.5 under the blocks and 0mm or 1mm under the upper link feels best.
Don't the new 418 ball studs have a 1mm shim build into them now? So when you say no shims under the 418 studs would you still record this as 1mm on a set up sheet? I only ask because I switched out the kit studs for the fluorine coated ball studs that do not have the 1mm shim built into them.
c2tcardin is offline  
Old 02-22-2014 | 03:21 PM
  #622  
narcotiks's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 452
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by c2tcardin
Don't the new 418 ball studs have a 1mm shim build into them now? So when you say no shims under the 418 studs would you still record this as 1mm on a set up sheet? I only ask because I switched out the kit studs for the fluorine coated ball studs that do not have the 1mm shim built into them.
The 418 studs do have that 1mm shim built in.
When I record no shims on setup sheet, this means no shim on 418 stud, which is 1mm shim the fluorine ballstud.
So 1mm on a 418 setup sheet would be with the 418 ball stud, which is 2mm on the older fluorine ball stud.
narcotiks is offline  
Old 02-22-2014 | 05:07 PM
  #623  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 129
From: North Carolina
Default

Cool thanks, That's what I was doing too.
c2tcardin is offline  
Old 02-23-2014 | 11:37 PM
  #624  
sosidge's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,650
From: Bristol, UK
Default

So I've been struggling a bit with rear end grip on my 418, generally having to dial out steering to keep it under control, but I would like to have a bit more lock in the car for the very tight corners. Any suggestions for changes from kit settings that are working for you to get the rear end planted?
sosidge is offline  
Old 02-23-2014 | 11:52 PM
  #625  
Chuggz's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 485
Default

Centre screw out!
Chuggz is offline  
Old 02-24-2014 | 02:01 AM
  #626  
Tech Master
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,458
From: santa monica / manchester
Default

As above, taking the centre screw out gives you loads of rear end (Too much) although I actually like running the 6 degree hubs on mine, it seems to calm out the rear on the sweepers and on tighter corners past the apex.
Qatmix is offline  
Old 02-24-2014 | 04:23 AM
  #627  
narcotiks's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 452
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by sosidge
So I've been struggling a bit with rear end grip on my 418, generally having to dial out steering to keep it under control, but I would like to have a bit more lock in the car for the very tight corners. Any suggestions for changes from kit settings that are working for you to get the rear end planted?
XC - C rear blocks will give you exactly what you're after.
As for the centre screw, I've had mixed results, it works well if you want the car to rotate more through the corner, but can also (depending on the rest of the setup) make the car over rotate on corner exit and make it "keep steering" around the corner. It feels like it gives the car more corner speed but I'm not sure if it actually does. I think on small twisty tracks it will work effectively because it allows a quicker direction change, but on larger tracks with sweeping corners it can have mixed results.
narcotiks is offline  
Old 02-24-2014 | 11:41 AM
  #628  
Chuggz's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 485
Default

Mine always had rear grip with the screw but with it out chicanes are very stable at speed
Chuggz is offline  
Old 02-24-2014 | 11:50 AM
  #629  
sosidge's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,650
From: Bristol, UK
Default

I was holding off but I've gone out and ordered almost all of the tuning parts for a 418, so I'll be able to play with caster, track width, front drivetrain and roll centres to my hearts delight. If past experience is anything to go by I'll end up back on kit settings but at least I will have learnt a bit more in the process!
sosidge is offline  
Old 02-24-2014 | 06:59 PM
  #630  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,741
Default

anyone know when new stock is expected at most stores?

good pricing *was* between $475and $550, but those that seem to have stock are sitting around the $599-$699 price point.

trying to decide whether to just suck it up and go to speedtech at $599 or wait for somewhere like Banzai to get stock again - $100 buy quite a few spares and bits!
cplus is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.