Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Radio and Electronics
AMB's update of decoder .. MRT transponders will not work >

AMB's update of decoder .. MRT transponders will not work

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AMB's update of decoder .. MRT transponders will not work

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2013 | 07:42 PM
  #136  
Suspended
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by Bob Malphurs
Again.... if you re-read my post I said "RC4 Hybrid and all earlier AMB/MyLaps PT's are forward and backward compatible (RC2, RC3 and RC4 decoders).
I clearly understand the difference between the two, and am suggesting it's not as simple or seamless as some would like to believe. Our experience has been that even some of the hybrids are not being picked up by the new decoder. So I stand by my previous statements..
pablo040 is offline  
Old 03-01-2013 | 07:47 PM
  #137  
Suspended
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by youwish16
do you guys think MyLaps will kill off the older AMB transponders eventually?
I called them a few months back and couldn't get a straight answer, so due to them dodging the question my belief is YES.
pablo040 is offline  
Old 03-02-2013 | 05:40 AM
  #138  
JimmyG's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 471
From: Taylor, MI
Default

Originally Posted by youwish16
do you guys think MyLaps will kill off the older AMB transponders eventually?
I dont see it happening.
JimmyG is offline  
Old 03-02-2013 | 05:44 AM
  #139  
JimmyG's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 471
From: Taylor, MI
Default

Originally Posted by pablo040
I clearly understand the difference between the two, and am suggesting it's not as simple or seamless as some would like to believe. Our experience has been that even some of the hybrids are not being picked up by the new decoder. So I stand by my previous statements..
We have house transponders from 2001. They get picked up every single time, and they are older than the hybrid. If a hybrid (or any other transponder) is not being picked up, its usually from transponder placement within the vehicle, loop placement.
JimmyG is offline  
Old 03-02-2013 | 03:41 PM
  #140  
wingracer's Avatar
Tech Lord
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,767
Default

Originally Posted by pablo040
I clearly understand the difference between the two, and am suggesting it's not as simple or seamless as some would like to believe. Our experience has been that even some of the hybrids are not being picked up by the new decoder. So I stand by my previous statements..
That is not what your earlier statement was. The following is:

Originally Posted by pablo040
NO - the new rc4 transponders are not compatible with rc3 and earlier decoders.
So rc4 transponders will not work at all tracks, only those with the new rc4 decoders (which most tracks do not have).
In one you are talking about RC3, in the other RC4. Which statement are you trying to make?

I have seen ZERO issues with RC4 Hybrids working with RC3. We all know that RC4 Pure or purcy or whatever the hell it is doesn't work with RC3. No one is arguing that. That is why ROAR and many tracks are having to upgrade.
wingracer is offline  
Old 03-02-2013 | 04:29 PM
  #141  
Suspended
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by JimmyG
We have house transponders from 2001. They get picked up every single time, and they are older than the hybrid. If a hybrid (or any other transponder) is not being picked up, its usually from transponder placement within the vehicle, loop placement.
Every single time???
Wasn't that but one of the reasons we went away from them?
pablo040 is offline  
Old 03-02-2013 | 08:10 PM
  #142  
JimmyG's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 471
From: Taylor, MI
Default

Originally Posted by pablo040
Every single time???
Wasn't that but one of the reasons we went away from them?
Please clarify, I dont understand what you are getting at..
JimmyG is offline  
Old 03-02-2013 | 08:20 PM
  #143  
Suspended
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by JimmyG
Please clarify, I dont understand what you are getting at..
That the handout transponders were far from reliable.
pablo040 is offline  
Old 03-02-2013 | 09:35 PM
  #144  
Bishop's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,223
From: Brisbane
Default

Originally Posted by pablo040
That the handout transponders were far from reliable.
Usually they have a stronger signal than the original AMB personals, nothing wrong with them at all, other than the odd failure and dying battery.
Bishop is offline  
Old 03-03-2013 | 03:32 AM
  #145  
Ed Anderson's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,375
From: N.J.
Default

Originally Posted by pablo040
Every single time???
Wasn't that but one of the reasons we went away from them?
Never heard of them being unreliable.... they were just expensive.. about $113 in the end., & about $80 + shipping to get the batteries replaced from AMB... (yes I know there are other options)

From MyLaps's stand point,... systems that read personals had been out about 11 years... most people had personals... no need for them.


My feelings on them... they're a pain in the a$$. When they first came out it was like the old AMB20 system... the racers would help you police them as they needed them for the next race. Now with most racers having a personal you can have 5 - 6 classes and maybe need 2 - 3 house transponders. You don't pay attention to them... racers brake and leave.. stop running a class... next thing you know they are gone... Plus I have to maintain them.

But I still have a few... don't want to turn anyone away..
Ed Anderson is offline  
Old 03-03-2013 | 06:13 AM
  #146  
JimmyG's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 471
From: Taylor, MI
Default

I love house transponders and would never give them up. I debated this on the phone with MyLaps this past year. We have ALOT of new racers, rookies/beginners, that are getting into the hobby. If a parent is buying a r/c car for the kids to play with in the yard, and then they try racing, adding a expensive (in their eyes) transponder is not a option, so house transponders come in. The kids get to run, have fun, and parents dont have to spend the extra money so their kids laps get counted. We dont charge extra for transponder use, just the simple entry fee. If we didnt have the house transponders, we wouldnt have a beginner class.
Now, going back to my point with MyLaps. What it came down to was, they understood my point, agreed with me, but basically, the system is for the racer.. They are not going to spend the resources on the house transponders due to the sales of them have dropped significantly. If the beginners like racing enough, then they will go and get a PT when the time comes.

As far as the house transponders being unreliable.. never. They have always counted, never have failed. The only issue we ever had was the loop was broken. That was causing intermittent lap counts across all transponders.
JimmyG is offline  
Old 03-03-2013 | 06:57 AM
  #147  
Bob Malphurs's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,162
From: Monroe, GA USA
Default

The only problem I ever knew of with the AMB RC house transponders was in the very first batch, musta been 1999. It was due to cold solder joints at the battery. And this was just a few isolated case but they did the right thing and recalled the whole batch. Chances are if anyone had one of the recalls the battery would of been replaced at least once.

Also have some house transponders and as a race director seen hundreds used at many different tracks. only problem I ever witnessed was battery failure.

A couple of years later they came out with the PT's. After the first run they did increase the signal strength slightly. I still use mine from the first run and never missed a lap!

Over the last several years I have seen the PT's not count in some 1/8th E-Buggies. This was mostly due to loop location. I found that if the loop was placed right after a turn where the car was under hard acceleration the amp draw of these motors was robbing power from the PT. Problem was solved by moving the loop or using a small receiver battery pack for the PT alone.
Bob Malphurs is offline  
Old 03-03-2013 | 04:26 PM
  #148  
Suspended
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 534
Default

Must've just been the tracks I went to.
pablo040 is offline  
Old 03-04-2013 | 04:39 AM
  #149  
Bob Malphurs's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,162
From: Monroe, GA USA
Default

My point being in my previous post is nothing is perfect! But with my experience in directing races, 99.9999% of the time the AMB/MyLaps transponder works perfectly in a perfect senario!
Bob Malphurs is offline  
Old 03-04-2013 | 07:21 AM
  #150  
Suspended
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 534
Default

And my point being, in directing hundreds of races and having attended probably thousands elsewhere - that nothing is perfect, and suggesting anything close to 99.9999999999% accuracy considering all the imperfect scenarios is ridiculous.

But anyways................ have a great week.
pablo040 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.