RC10B4.1 FT/WC
Tech Addict
iTrader: (38)
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 628
From: Las Vegas nv
Tech Initiate
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 39
The only thing that I don't like about the BB and maybe it's just that I'm super anal about my cars but the collar, eyelet, and "hat bushing" I think it's called are all different shades of anodized blue. I just feel if youre going to spend 100 on shocks at least all the blue could match,
Anal = pertaining to the rectum
Spuer anal = I don't wanna write what that means. lol
FWIW....There's a distinct difference!
They're probably made by different people with different metals, which anodize a different shade. That'd be my guess anyway...
Not according to dictionary.com but whatever, I'm not here to argue.
Back on topic,
About to start my main and I have to say, for me at least, the BB are like night and day compared to the V2's with BB springs
Tech Addict
iTrader: (38)
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 628
From: Las Vegas nv
The metal is all the same, every batch of anodizing comes out a slightly different shade. You just got pieces from different batches.
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,610
From: Vancouver, Washington
Just finished building my AE BB. I built one using Kyosho clear orings w /Kyosho blank pistons drilled to 1.6 2 hole and built one as it came in the package. I thought that the shock with the K parts will be way smoother but after comparing the two, the stock built one feels way better.
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,610
From: Vancouver, Washington
http://m.dictionary.com/definition/Anile/?linkId=khyton
Not according to dictionary.com but whatever, I'm not here to argue.
Back on topic,
About to start my main and I have to say, for me at least, the BB are like night and day compared to the V2's with BB springs
Not according to dictionary.com but whatever, I'm not here to argue.
Back on topic,
About to start my main and I have to say, for me at least, the BB are like night and day compared to the V2's with BB springs
Bummer, cause the car felt really nice to drive with these new shocks.
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,610
From: Vancouver, Washington
Ok well for the record, I just yet again checked the AE instructions included with my shocks, and it states 2 washers at the bottom on the rears. I'm having a hard time believing AE would put out info that would cause this damage to occur, but since I'm using their shocks and springs, and have every correct size spacer in the correct location (and always did), this just seems messed up. I'm going to be stopping by AE next week. 2 new rear shock bodies and lower caps along with a solution is what I'll be expecting unless they can show me what I did wrong. I know it's only slight cosmetic damage, but obviously the link shouldn't be hitting (which is going to cause some change in performance).
Bummer, cause the car felt really nice to drive with these new shocks.
Bummer, cause the car felt really nice to drive with these new shocks.
Last edited by jpcopeland1; 10-06-2012 at 10:52 PM.
Rigor-I noticed today that my rear shocks have the same issue...however I don't think it's due to spacing. I think the Rear springs were rubbing the shock body because they have too many coils. I switched to the X Gear springs and the problem is gone...
What rear springs were you using when you noticed the problem?
What rear springs were you using when you noticed the problem?
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,610
From: Vancouver, Washington
Rigor-I noticed today that my rear shocks have the same issue...however I don't think it's due to spacing. I think the Rear springs were rubbing the shock body because they have too many coils. I switched to the X Gear springs and the problem is gone...
What rear springs were you using when you noticed the problem?
What rear springs were you using when you noticed the problem?
Have broken two ft towers after grinding to fit BB .
To use the original shock position you have grind quite bit off the ft tower.
Makes for a weaker part and now know from experience you guys might like to use something stronger .
Now use the longer FT shock bushing(#1781) & a .030 shim behind it .
You will have to shave very little for the shock to clear & makes for a lot stronger tower & a happier racer ....
Rear tower seems to be strong enough to handle the trim , no breaks from the rear tower yet ...
To use the original shock position you have grind quite bit off the ft tower.
Makes for a weaker part and now know from experience you guys might like to use something stronger .
Now use the longer FT shock bushing(#1781) & a .030 shim behind it .
You will have to shave very little for the shock to clear & makes for a lot stronger tower & a happier racer ....

Rear tower seems to be strong enough to handle the trim , no breaks from the rear tower yet ...
Ok well for the record, I just yet again checked the AE instructions included with my shocks, and it states 2 washers at the bottom on the rears. I'm having a hard time believing AE would put out info that would cause this damage to occur, but since I'm using their shocks and springs, and have every correct size spacer in the correct location (and always did), this just seems messed up. I'm going to be stopping by AE next week. 2 new rear shock bodies and lower caps along with a solution is what I'll be expecting unless they can show me what I did wrong. I know it's only slight cosmetic damage, but obviously the link shouldn't be hitting (which is going to cause some change in performance).
Bummer, cause the car felt really nice to drive with these new shocks.
Bummer, cause the car felt really nice to drive with these new shocks.
Have broken two ft towers after grinding to fit BB .
To use the original shock position you have grind quite bit off the ft tower.
Makes for a weaker part and now know from experience you guys might like to use something stronger .
Now use the longer FT shock bushing(#1781) & a .030 shim behind it .
You will have to shave very little for the shock to clear & makes for a lot stronger tower & a happier racer ....
Rear tower seems to be strong enough to handle the trim , no breaks from the rear tower yet ...
To use the original shock position you have grind quite bit off the ft tower.
Makes for a weaker part and now know from experience you guys might like to use something stronger .
Now use the longer FT shock bushing(#1781) & a .030 shim behind it .
You will have to shave very little for the shock to clear & makes for a lot stronger tower & a happier racer ....

Rear tower seems to be strong enough to handle the trim , no breaks from the rear tower yet ...
As embarrassing as it all sounds...
I did do as you suggested for the 2nd tower & used a .030 under the short shock bushing (#1780) .....
Broke it ....

This is why I posted a even stronger
set-up with the least grinding necessary ....

The short vs the long short bushing is like 2mm difference...so that would be an extra 2mm of grinding so I'm not surprised it broke!



