R/C Tech Forums - View Single Post - SC10 4x4 Thread
Thread: SC10 4x4 Thread
View Single Post
Old 10-20-2011 | 07:56 PM
  #9121  
T-BirdJunkie's Avatar
T-BirdJunkie
Tech Elite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,974
From: Norwood, OH...and CCRCR and The OhioRCFactory
Default

Originally Posted by SourDieselX
Actually, I'm Libertarian, Ron Paul 2012

but you're a total tool constantly referring to yourself in the 3rd person. you probably don't even own an r/c and are beating behind the bush on mommys pc.
The funny part is, ThunderbirdJunkie is aligned with you politically.

You're a crappy Libertarian if you judge one solely on one aspect of their social interaction on an internet forum. Try going outside and getting some sun It'll make you feel better. Really.

If you're seriously going to go out of your way to go off topic to insult somebody on a toy car forum, perhaps it is you that doesn't even own an RC and is "beating behind the bush" on mommy's computer...whatever that means

Seriously, try to make some sense when you post. Just because it's something your older brother who's a Junior (UPPERCLASSMAN! TOTALLY COOL!) in high school said doesn't mean it's smart or even funny.

More to the point, none of the posts ThunderbirdJunkie has seen you make in this thread pertain to the SC10 4x4...or RC at all...so where are you really going with this?
Originally Posted by symmetricon
Oh, come on T-Bird. Every other aluminum chassis has a chassis brace, in fact multiple styles of chassis braces. Is that because of a poor product design in those other trucks? No. People tune and tweak their trucks accordingly to there desires. I was running saddle packs, and never had an issue due to flex. If you run a stick pack in the truck, there is no need for the chassis brace at all.

I dont know what is up with the a arms, but the second set f stock a arms have not bowed on my truck. With that said, I did go ahead and by the RPM a arms, and they seem to be better.

It is easy to be a back seat driver, a monday morning quarterback.... just saying.
You're absolutely right. They have chassis braces.

BECAUSE OF THE FLAT CHASSIS with very little support otherwise.

In case you haven't noticed, AE's SC10 4x4's chassis is not flat. Show ThunderbirdJunkie an RC that has a chassis that isn't flat that requires a brace to prevent the drivetrain from coming apart under normal use.

Seriously, do you people even think before you post stupid shit like this?
Originally Posted by BlueGlowBoy
People who buy the top end corvette are still buying aftermarket parts to make it faster...people who buy the top end ferrari are still trying to find ways of making it faster too...hell, I've seen lamborghini's with dual two stage aftermarket turbos, and even Bugatti's original Veyron with it's massive 1001HP....people wanted more, so they came out with the grand sport with even MORE power and a stiffer chassis....

no matter how well something is built, people will want more....
Yet, we're not using a chassis brace to enhance performance...the chassis brace is being used to prevent the belt from coming off. That is far different from modifying for performance...it's modifying to fix something that should've never been wrong in the first place.
T-BirdJunkie is offline