You need to brush up on your reading skills immensely. My current draw comparison was based on the CURRENT Hitec HV servos(7940,7945,7954,7950), and compared directly to the current lineup of Savox servos(1267,1268).
Look bro, i'm trying to have a civil non-subjective discussion with you. But now you are taking things too far with your comments.
READ MY QUOTE: "Looks like a typo on the 9380 as is should be .13 sec. The specs are essentially the same as the 7940/45/50 but sip power and do not slow down as they are heavily loaded. Playing with the sample I got last week, I would hang 10lbs of weight on the highest speed version and it drew only .23A.. the similar 7940 was 2.5A"
It clearly states the newer servos are running at .23A and the current 7940 servos are running at 2.5A. That's around 10X difference!
Here's the thread!
http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/showthread.php?t=309838
sounds like you need to brush up on your reading skills! My quote had NOTHING to do with savox servos!
You stated that a SAVOX(There is no such thing as a Savox "ultra torque" servo) servo had a spec rating of 391oz./.10 spec rating(Its actually 319, not 391 as there is no posted spec servo with 391oz. of torque) when in fact your were quoting a spec rating off a new 9370 BL Hitec servo that hasnt even been released yet.
ONCE AGAIN, i clearly stated it was a mistake on my quote. I clearly said the servo i was referring to was 361 and .11sec. And there is a such thing as savox ultra torque.
From Amainhobbies:
Savox SC-1268MG "
Ultra Torque" Digital Steel Gear Servo (High Voltage)
[SAV-SC-1268SG]
And now your changing your quoted spec rating to 361oz and .11 transit time specs, thats different from 391/.10 as you quoted originally. LOL!
Once again, i said it was a mistake!
"teeforb: Sorry, going off of memory which isn't a good thing. It was 361 and .11 @ 7.4v."
I suggest before you post again here to carefully reread all the previous posts on this thread.
There is nothing I put that was incorrect that wasn't corrected. I suggest you read more carefully and open your mind up to a non-subjective debate. It's clear that you are Hitec biased, which caused this to be a pointless discussion.