Originally Posted by
Colt4g63
Werks/Ron i didn't design the X-Dyno, that would be Brian Kinney. And people have been trying to copying the X-Dyno for years... I see a few in this industry building dynos using the same software and a similar design as the X-Dyno "Inertia Engine dyno" and although its a dyno for R&D it still doesn't put out the same numbers that we all are used to seeing out of the original X-Dyno, as they have to set there dyno up on there own to read how they want it to read. With my X-Dyno its a production dyno which is locked down and i can not change the settings on how the dyno reads. And honestly people building these dynos for there own R&D and knowledge is fine with me and i commend them for doing so and wanting to learn more about there trade and put out a good end product to there customers. You don't see me attacking others dynos when i see higher #s and different curves from there dyno then what the original X-Dyno puts out, as at the end of the day its just a tool and when used properly can be a VERY beneficial tool.
I get that and also sorry about misspeaking about the original designer of the x-dyno but I think that you get the point that I was trying to make about how I would also address things if someone (specifically a manufacturer for the purpose of re-selling them) did not build their own but rather exactly copied the dyno system that you use. Also agree that these systems are very beneficial when it comes to development, imho as a consumer I would not deal with a modifier that does not have/use one. In any case I'm going to have to cut this one short so that I can respond to Mr. Anderson's bs.